Self-Managed Medication Abortion: History, Evidence, Models of Care, and Policy Considerations.

IF 9.6 1区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Laura E Jacobson,Caitlin Gerdts
{"title":"Self-Managed Medication Abortion: History, Evidence, Models of Care, and Policy Considerations.","authors":"Laura E Jacobson,Caitlin Gerdts","doi":"10.2105/ajph.2025.308133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Self-managed abortion (SMA) represents a significant shift in the abortion landscape, offering an alternative to facility-based care via the medication misoprostol with or without mifepristone. The World Health Organization recommends SMA with medications as safe and effective up to 12 weeks' gestation and with access to information and health system referrals. Increasing prevalence of SMA can be attributed to a range of factors, including legal and logistical barriers to facility-based care as well as a social movement advocating autonomy and demedicalized practices in the United States, particularly after the US Supreme Court decided Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Org., 597 US (2022). We document the history, safety and effectiveness, measurement challenges, and models of SMA care and review ongoing legal and policy challenges. Despite its clinical and practical advantages, SMA exists in a complex policy environment that hinders access to safe abortion. Evidence from diverse regions demonstrates the potential for SMA to expand access, especially where care is limited or restricted. As research affirms the safety of SMA, including later in pregnancy, it remains vital to protect and expand access to abortion medications, without threat of criminalization, to ensure that individuals can exercise their reproductive rights and autonomy. (Am J Public Health. Published online ahead of print June 18, 2025:e1-e8. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2025.308133).","PeriodicalId":7647,"journal":{"name":"American journal of public health","volume":"44 1","pages":"e1-e8"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of public health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2025.308133","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Self-managed abortion (SMA) represents a significant shift in the abortion landscape, offering an alternative to facility-based care via the medication misoprostol with or without mifepristone. The World Health Organization recommends SMA with medications as safe and effective up to 12 weeks' gestation and with access to information and health system referrals. Increasing prevalence of SMA can be attributed to a range of factors, including legal and logistical barriers to facility-based care as well as a social movement advocating autonomy and demedicalized practices in the United States, particularly after the US Supreme Court decided Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Org., 597 US (2022). We document the history, safety and effectiveness, measurement challenges, and models of SMA care and review ongoing legal and policy challenges. Despite its clinical and practical advantages, SMA exists in a complex policy environment that hinders access to safe abortion. Evidence from diverse regions demonstrates the potential for SMA to expand access, especially where care is limited or restricted. As research affirms the safety of SMA, including later in pregnancy, it remains vital to protect and expand access to abortion medications, without threat of criminalization, to ensure that individuals can exercise their reproductive rights and autonomy. (Am J Public Health. Published online ahead of print June 18, 2025:e1-e8. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2025.308133).
自我管理药物流产:历史、证据、护理模式和政策考虑。
自我管理流产(SMA)代表了流产领域的重大转变,通过米索前列醇加或不加米非司酮提供了一种替代设施护理的方法。世界卫生组织建议,在妊娠12周之前服用安全有效的药物,并可获得信息和卫生系统转诊。SMA的日益流行可归因于一系列因素,包括设施护理的法律和后勤障碍,以及美国倡导自主和非医疗化实践的社会运动,特别是在美国最高法院决定多布斯诉杰克逊妇女健康组织之后。美国597年(2022年)。我们记录了SMA护理的历史、安全性和有效性、测量挑战和模式,并回顾了正在进行的法律和政策挑战。尽管SMA具有临床和实践优势,但它存在于一个复杂的政策环境中,阻碍了获得安全堕胎。来自不同地区的证据表明,SMA具有扩大获取的潜力,特别是在医疗有限或受到限制的地方。由于研究证实了SMA的安全性,包括在怀孕后期,保护和扩大获得堕胎药物的机会仍然至关重要,而不会受到刑事定罪的威胁,以确保个人能够行使其生殖权利和自主权。公共卫生。2025年6月18日在线出版:e1-e8。https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2025.308133)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of public health
American journal of public health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
3.90%
发文量
1109
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Public Health (AJPH) is dedicated to publishing original work in research, research methods, and program evaluation within the field of public health. The journal's mission is to advance public health research, policy, practice, and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信