Performance evaluation and optimization of pharmaceutical removal with sulfate radical-based photooxidation processes by machine learning algorithms

IF 8.1 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
Narmin Garazade, Emine Can-Güven, Fatih Güven, Senem Yazici Guvenc, Gamze Varank
{"title":"Performance evaluation and optimization of pharmaceutical removal with sulfate radical-based photooxidation processes by machine learning algorithms","authors":"Narmin Garazade, Emine Can-Güven, Fatih Güven, Senem Yazici Guvenc, Gamze Varank","doi":"10.1016/j.seppur.2025.134047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficiency of sulfate radical-based photooxidation using machine learning algorithms in the removal of metformin (METF), one of the most widely used pharmaceuticals in the world. UVC lamps were used in photochemical oxidation processes, and peroxydisulfate (PS) and peroxymonosulfate (PMS) were added as oxidants. The effects of UV-based process variables (initial pH, PS/PMS dose, initial METF concentration) on METF removal and the optimum conditions were determined. Under optimum conditions, the effect of inorganic anions, dominant radical species, and unit energy consumption (EE/O) was determined. The removal efficiencies of METF were 53.9 % and 58.3 % for the UV/PS and UV/PMS processes, respectively, under optimum conditions (4 mM PS dose and pH 7 for the UV/PS process; 8 mM PMS dose and pH 9 for the UV/PMS process). For both processes, nitrate decreased the METF removal rate while sulfate and phosphate were ineffective. The effect of bicarbonate and chloride was positive in the UV/PMS process and negative in the UV/PS process. Based on contribution rates, the dominant radical types were sulfate and hydroxyl radicals in the UV/PS and UV/PMS processes, respectively. EE/O values were determined as 1.19 and 1.05 kWh/L for the UV/PS and UV/PMS processes, respectively. METF removal was effectively modeled using machine learning algorithms, yielding high R<sup>2</sup> values and low MAE and RMSE levels. XGBoost models performed well, with no overfitting and successful generalization.","PeriodicalId":427,"journal":{"name":"Separation and Purification Technology","volume":"528 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Separation and Purification Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2025.134047","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficiency of sulfate radical-based photooxidation using machine learning algorithms in the removal of metformin (METF), one of the most widely used pharmaceuticals in the world. UVC lamps were used in photochemical oxidation processes, and peroxydisulfate (PS) and peroxymonosulfate (PMS) were added as oxidants. The effects of UV-based process variables (initial pH, PS/PMS dose, initial METF concentration) on METF removal and the optimum conditions were determined. Under optimum conditions, the effect of inorganic anions, dominant radical species, and unit energy consumption (EE/O) was determined. The removal efficiencies of METF were 53.9 % and 58.3 % for the UV/PS and UV/PMS processes, respectively, under optimum conditions (4 mM PS dose and pH 7 for the UV/PS process; 8 mM PMS dose and pH 9 for the UV/PMS process). For both processes, nitrate decreased the METF removal rate while sulfate and phosphate were ineffective. The effect of bicarbonate and chloride was positive in the UV/PMS process and negative in the UV/PS process. Based on contribution rates, the dominant radical types were sulfate and hydroxyl radicals in the UV/PS and UV/PMS processes, respectively. EE/O values were determined as 1.19 and 1.05 kWh/L for the UV/PS and UV/PMS processes, respectively. METF removal was effectively modeled using machine learning algorithms, yielding high R2 values and low MAE and RMSE levels. XGBoost models performed well, with no overfitting and successful generalization.
基于机器学习算法的硫酸盐基光氧化脱除药物的性能评价与优化
本研究的目的是利用机器学习算法评估硫酸盐自由基光氧化去除二甲双胍(METF)的效率,二甲双胍是世界上使用最广泛的药物之一。采用UVC灯进行光化学氧化,加入过氧硫酸氢盐(PS)和过氧单硫酸氢盐(PMS)作为氧化剂。确定了初始pH、PS/PMS剂量、初始METF浓度等工艺参数对去除METF的影响及最佳条件。在最优条件下,考察了无机阴离子、优势自由基种类和单位能耗(EE/O)的影响。UV/PS和UV/PMS工艺在4 mM PS和pH为7的最佳条件下,对METF的去除率分别为53.9% %和58.3% %;8 mM PMS剂量和pH为UV/PMS过程)。在这两种工艺中,硝酸盐都降低了METF的去除率,而硫酸盐和磷酸盐则无效。碳酸氢盐和氯化物对紫外/PMS法的影响为正,对紫外/PS法的影响为负。从贡献率来看,UV/PS和UV/PMS过程中主要自由基类型分别为硫酸盐自由基和羟基自由基。UV/PS和UV/PMS工艺的EE/O值分别为1.19和1.05 kWh/L。METF去除使用机器学习算法有效地建模,产生高R2值和低MAE和RMSE水平。XGBoost模型表现良好,没有过拟合,泛化成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Separation and Purification Technology
Separation and Purification Technology 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
12.80%
发文量
2347
审稿时长
43 days
期刊介绍: Separation and Purification Technology is a premier journal committed to sharing innovative methods for separation and purification in chemical and environmental engineering, encompassing both homogeneous solutions and heterogeneous mixtures. Our scope includes the separation and/or purification of liquids, vapors, and gases, as well as carbon capture and separation techniques. However, it's important to note that methods solely intended for analytical purposes are not within the scope of the journal. Additionally, disciplines such as soil science, polymer science, and metallurgy fall outside the purview of Separation and Purification Technology. Join us in advancing the field of separation and purification methods for sustainable solutions in chemical and environmental engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信