Kalyaani Persad, Aqeelah Khatoon, Aashritha Buchipudi, Amanda Ling Jie Yee, Nevil C. Philip, Angelica Sharma, Akshat Sinha, Sofia Salahuddin, Punith Kempegowda, DEVI collaboration
{"title":"Simulation-based training significantly improved confidence and clinical skills of resident doctors in acute diabetes management","authors":"Kalyaani Persad, Aqeelah Khatoon, Aashritha Buchipudi, Amanda Ling Jie Yee, Nevil C. Philip, Angelica Sharma, Akshat Sinha, Sofia Salahuddin, Punith Kempegowda, DEVI collaboration","doi":"10.1111/dme.70068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>The joint consensus of the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes highlights the need for practical, up-to-date training in acute diabetes care. Therefore, this session aimed to develop an applied learning intervention that identifies key gaps in acute diabetes training, assesses participants' change in confidence in managing these scenarios following the intervention and evaluates participants' satisfaction and the intervention's relevance to practice.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>To design the programme, we adopted Kern's six-step curriculum development framework. Clinical experts were interviewed to assess general needs, and students and resident doctors were interviewed to assess targeted needs. The SIMBA (Simulation via Instant Messaging for Bedside Application) model was adopted to develop cases alongside generative AI and expert input. Pre- and post-session surveys assessed participants' confidence, while the latter also assessed satisfaction and relevance to practice.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>33 participants attended the session. 17 participants completed both pre- and post-session surveys and were included in the study. Simulation performance scores averaged 4.0/5 for history taking, interpretation and clinical judgement; 3.9/5 for physical examination and investigations; and 3.6/5 for management. Confidence in managing acute diabetes scenarios improved significantly (pre vs. post: 33.3% vs. 78.4%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). 94.1% strongly agreed the cases were relevant, and 82.3% preferred this teaching method over traditional approaches.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The model identified the need for targeted education on physical examination, investigations and management specific to acute diabetes scenarios. Simulation-based education significantly enhances confidence and is perceived as highly relevant for training in acute diabetes management.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11251,"journal":{"name":"Diabetic Medicine","volume":"42 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/dme.70068","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dme.70068","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aims
The joint consensus of the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes highlights the need for practical, up-to-date training in acute diabetes care. Therefore, this session aimed to develop an applied learning intervention that identifies key gaps in acute diabetes training, assesses participants' change in confidence in managing these scenarios following the intervention and evaluates participants' satisfaction and the intervention's relevance to practice.
Methods
To design the programme, we adopted Kern's six-step curriculum development framework. Clinical experts were interviewed to assess general needs, and students and resident doctors were interviewed to assess targeted needs. The SIMBA (Simulation via Instant Messaging for Bedside Application) model was adopted to develop cases alongside generative AI and expert input. Pre- and post-session surveys assessed participants' confidence, while the latter also assessed satisfaction and relevance to practice.
Results
33 participants attended the session. 17 participants completed both pre- and post-session surveys and were included in the study. Simulation performance scores averaged 4.0/5 for history taking, interpretation and clinical judgement; 3.9/5 for physical examination and investigations; and 3.6/5 for management. Confidence in managing acute diabetes scenarios improved significantly (pre vs. post: 33.3% vs. 78.4%, p < 0.001). 94.1% strongly agreed the cases were relevant, and 82.3% preferred this teaching method over traditional approaches.
Conclusion
The model identified the need for targeted education on physical examination, investigations and management specific to acute diabetes scenarios. Simulation-based education significantly enhances confidence and is perceived as highly relevant for training in acute diabetes management.
目的:美国糖尿病协会和欧洲糖尿病研究协会的联合共识强调了在急性糖尿病护理方面需要实用的、最新的培训。因此,本次会议旨在开发一种应用学习干预,以确定急性糖尿病培训中的关键差距,评估参与者在干预后管理这些情景的信心变化,并评估参与者的满意度和干预与实践的相关性。方法:我们采用Kern的六步课程开发框架来设计课程。对临床专家进行访谈以评估一般需求,对学生和住院医生进行访谈以评估目标需求。采用SIMBA(通过即时消息进行床边应用的仿真)模型与生成式人工智能和专家输入一起开发案例。课程前和课程后的调查评估了参与者的信心,而后者也评估了满意度和与实践的相关性。结果:33名参与者参加了会议。17名参与者完成了会前和会后的调查,并被纳入研究。历史记录、解释和临床判断模拟成绩平均为4.0/5分;3.9/5用于体检和调查;管理3.6/5。治疗急性糖尿病患者的信心显著提高(治疗前vs.治疗后:33.3% vs. 78.4%)。结论:该模型确定了针对急性糖尿病患者进行体检、调查和管理的针对性教育的必要性。基于模拟的教育显著增强了信心,并被认为与急性糖尿病管理培训高度相关。
期刊介绍:
Diabetic Medicine, the official journal of Diabetes UK, is published monthly simultaneously, in print and online editions.
The journal publishes a range of key information on all clinical aspects of diabetes mellitus, ranging from human genetic studies through clinical physiology and trials to diabetes epidemiology. We do not publish original animal or cell culture studies unless they are part of a study of clinical diabetes involving humans. Categories of publication include research articles, reviews, editorials, commentaries, and correspondence. All material is peer-reviewed.
We aim to disseminate knowledge about diabetes research with the goal of improving the management of people with diabetes. The journal therefore seeks to provide a forum for the exchange of ideas between clinicians and researchers worldwide. Topics covered are of importance to all healthcare professionals working with people with diabetes, whether in primary care or specialist services.
Surplus generated from the sale of Diabetic Medicine is used by Diabetes UK to know diabetes better and fight diabetes more effectively on behalf of all people affected by and at risk of diabetes as well as their families and carers.”