[Bacterial filtration efficiency (BFE) of surgical masks used for eight hours and unused masks with Staphylococcus aureus].

Revista espanola de salud publica Pub Date : 2025-06-17
Sara Batista, Genoveva Cuesta, Mariana Fernandez-Pittol, Angely Roman, Griselda Tudó, Julián González-Martín
{"title":"[Bacterial filtration efficiency (BFE) of surgical masks used for eight hours and unused masks with Staphylococcus aureus].","authors":"Sara Batista, Genoveva Cuesta, Mariana Fernandez-Pittol, Angely Roman, Griselda Tudó, Julián González-Martín","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Spanish regulations and World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines recommend not using surgical masks for more than four hours. The high demand and low availability of surgical masks during the COVID-19 pandemic highlighted this as a major limitation. The objective of this study was to compare the bacterial filtration efficiency (BFE) between used surgical masks (eight hours) and unused masks (zero hours).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>208 surgical masks worn for eight hours in a row were studied. They were placed on a culture plate containing blood agar (Agar Columbia with sheep blood plus, Thermo Scientific) and sprayed a suspension of Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 29313) at a distance of thirty centimeters. Culture plates were incubated at 37 °C for twenty-four hours. A count of colony forming units (CFU) was carried out. As a control for BFE, new non-worn masks were included. A t-test and a z-test were used at a 95% confidence level to compare the means of the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>To establish the BFE, the CFU of the cultures from the used masks were compared with the control cultures without a mask. Likewise, the BFE of used masks was compared to that of new masks. The mean, median and mode values of the BFE of both masks, used and new ones, were greater than 99%. No statistically significant differences were detected between eight hours used masks and not used ones (zero hours).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Surgical masks maintain a BFE equivalent to that new, unused surgical masks at eight hours.</p>","PeriodicalId":94199,"journal":{"name":"Revista espanola de salud publica","volume":"99 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12172150/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista espanola de salud publica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Spanish regulations and World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines recommend not using surgical masks for more than four hours. The high demand and low availability of surgical masks during the COVID-19 pandemic highlighted this as a major limitation. The objective of this study was to compare the bacterial filtration efficiency (BFE) between used surgical masks (eight hours) and unused masks (zero hours).

Methods: 208 surgical masks worn for eight hours in a row were studied. They were placed on a culture plate containing blood agar (Agar Columbia with sheep blood plus, Thermo Scientific) and sprayed a suspension of Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 29313) at a distance of thirty centimeters. Culture plates were incubated at 37 °C for twenty-four hours. A count of colony forming units (CFU) was carried out. As a control for BFE, new non-worn masks were included. A t-test and a z-test were used at a 95% confidence level to compare the means of the two groups.

Results: To establish the BFE, the CFU of the cultures from the used masks were compared with the control cultures without a mask. Likewise, the BFE of used masks was compared to that of new masks. The mean, median and mode values of the BFE of both masks, used and new ones, were greater than 99%. No statistically significant differences were detected between eight hours used masks and not used ones (zero hours).

Conclusions: Surgical masks maintain a BFE equivalent to that new, unused surgical masks at eight hours.

[使用8小时的外科口罩和未使用的含金黄色葡萄球菌口罩的细菌过滤效率(BFE)]。
目的:西班牙法规和世界卫生组织(世卫组织)指南建议使用外科口罩的时间不要超过4小时。在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,医用口罩的高需求和低供应凸显了这一主要限制。本研究的目的是比较使用过的外科口罩(8小时)和未使用的口罩(0小时)的细菌过滤效率(BFE)。方法:对208个连续佩戴8小时的医用口罩进行研究。将它们放置在含有血琼脂的培养板上(琼脂哥伦比亚加羊血,Thermo Scientific),并在30厘米的距离喷洒金黄色葡萄球菌悬浮液(ATCC 29313)。培养板37℃孵育24小时。进行菌落形成单位(CFU)计数。作为BFE的对照,包括新的未佩戴的口罩。采用95%置信水平的t检验和z检验比较两组的均值。结果:将使用过的口罩培养物的CFU与未使用口罩的对照培养物进行比较,以建立BFE。同样,将使用过的口罩与新口罩的BFE进行比较。新旧口罩的BFE均值、中位数和模态值均大于99%。使用8小时口罩与未使用口罩(零小时)之间无统计学差异。结论:外科口罩与未使用的新外科口罩在8小时内保持等效的BFE。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信