Determining frailty index thresholds for older people across multiple countries in sub-Saharan Africa.

IF 5.4 Q1 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Gideon Dzando, Paul R Ward, Lillian Mwanri, Richard K Moussa, Justice Moses K Aheto, Rachel C Ambagtsheer
{"title":"Determining frailty index thresholds for older people across multiple countries in sub-Saharan Africa.","authors":"Gideon Dzando, Paul R Ward, Lillian Mwanri, Richard K Moussa, Justice Moses K Aheto, Rachel C Ambagtsheer","doi":"10.1038/s43856-025-00952-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite the increasing attention on frailty as a global public health concern, frailty screening among older people in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) continues to rely on instruments and thresholds from high-income countries. These instruments and thresholds may not be useful in SSA due to contextual differences. We explored the development of a frailty threshold for older people in SSA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We utilized pooled cross-sectional data from four SSA countries (Kenya, Ghana, Uganda and Côte d'Ivoire) to determine a frailty index threshold for 5527 older people (50 years and above) using a two-step approach. The mean ages of the participants ranged from 62.13 (SD: 9.60) to 74.00 (SD: 9.40) years. The participants were mostly females across the four countries, ranging from 50.1% in Côte d'Ivoire to 65.3% in Kenya. Country-specific frailty thresholds were developed using the Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) method. The primary thresholds were further combined into a single threshold using random effects meta-analysis. Subgroup analyses and meta-regression were conducted to explore potential sources of heterogeneity in the pooled frailty threshold.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Here we show the Area Under the Curves from the ROC analyses ranging between 0.91 (CI: 0.89, 0.93) and 0.94 (CI: 0.92, 0.97), with sensitivities ranging from 0.83 to 0.94 and specificities from 0.72 to 0.87. An overall threshold of 0.29 (95% CI: 0.25, 0.33) was obtained after pooled analysis of the country-specific thresholds.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This work demonstrates that using context-specific data can yield valuable insights into frailty thresholds among older people in SSA, enabling more culturally relevant interventions. Effective frailty screening must account for population-level differences, including demographic, health, and socio-cultural factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":72646,"journal":{"name":"Communications medicine","volume":"5 1","pages":"237"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12174359/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communications medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s43856-025-00952-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite the increasing attention on frailty as a global public health concern, frailty screening among older people in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) continues to rely on instruments and thresholds from high-income countries. These instruments and thresholds may not be useful in SSA due to contextual differences. We explored the development of a frailty threshold for older people in SSA.

Methods: We utilized pooled cross-sectional data from four SSA countries (Kenya, Ghana, Uganda and Côte d'Ivoire) to determine a frailty index threshold for 5527 older people (50 years and above) using a two-step approach. The mean ages of the participants ranged from 62.13 (SD: 9.60) to 74.00 (SD: 9.40) years. The participants were mostly females across the four countries, ranging from 50.1% in Côte d'Ivoire to 65.3% in Kenya. Country-specific frailty thresholds were developed using the Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) method. The primary thresholds were further combined into a single threshold using random effects meta-analysis. Subgroup analyses and meta-regression were conducted to explore potential sources of heterogeneity in the pooled frailty threshold.

Results: Here we show the Area Under the Curves from the ROC analyses ranging between 0.91 (CI: 0.89, 0.93) and 0.94 (CI: 0.92, 0.97), with sensitivities ranging from 0.83 to 0.94 and specificities from 0.72 to 0.87. An overall threshold of 0.29 (95% CI: 0.25, 0.33) was obtained after pooled analysis of the country-specific thresholds.

Conclusions: This work demonstrates that using context-specific data can yield valuable insights into frailty thresholds among older people in SSA, enabling more culturally relevant interventions. Effective frailty screening must account for population-level differences, including demographic, health, and socio-cultural factors.

确定撒哈拉以南非洲多个国家老年人的脆弱指数阈值。
背景:尽管衰弱作为一个全球公共卫生问题日益受到关注,但撒哈拉以南非洲(SSA)老年人的衰弱筛查仍然依赖于高收入国家的工具和阈值。由于上下文差异,这些工具和阈值在SSA中可能没有用处。我们探讨了SSA老年人脆弱阈值的发展。方法:我们利用来自四个SSA国家(肯尼亚、加纳、乌干达和Côte科特迪瓦)的汇总横截面数据,采用两步法确定5527名老年人(50岁及以上)的衰弱指数阈值。参与者的平均年龄范围为62.13 (SD: 9.60)至74.00 (SD: 9.40)岁。这四个国家的参与者大多是女性,从Côte科特迪瓦的50.1%到肯尼亚的65.3%不等。使用受试者工作特征(ROC)方法确定国家特定的脆弱阈值。使用随机效应meta分析将主要阈值进一步合并为单个阈值。进行亚组分析和meta回归,以探索综合脆弱阈值的潜在异质性来源。结果:在这里,我们显示了ROC分析的曲线下面积范围在0.91 (CI: 0.89, 0.93)和0.94 (CI: 0.92, 0.97)之间,敏感性范围为0.83至0.94,特异性范围为0.72至0.87。在对国家特异性阈值进行汇总分析后,获得了0.29的总阈值(95% CI: 0.25, 0.33)。结论:这项工作表明,使用特定情境的数据可以对SSA老年人的脆弱阈值产生有价值的见解,从而实现更多与文化相关的干预。有效的虚弱筛查必须考虑到人口水平的差异,包括人口、健康和社会文化因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信