Strain-Specific Differences in Cerebellar Anatomy between Laboratory and Wild Rats.

IF 1.8 4区 心理学 Q3 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Renata Waner-Mariquito, Lauren A Williams, Rachel A Stark, Rafał Stryjek, Klaudia Modlińska, Wojciech Pisula, Sergio M Pellis, Andrew N Iwaniuk
{"title":"Strain-Specific Differences in Cerebellar Anatomy between Laboratory and Wild Rats.","authors":"Renata Waner-Mariquito, Lauren A Williams, Rachel A Stark, Rafał Stryjek, Klaudia Modlińska, Wojciech Pisula, Sergio M Pellis, Andrew N Iwaniuk","doi":"10.1159/000546604","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Domestication and subsequent breed selection has significantly changed the phenotype of most domesticated animal species. Not only has their external appearance changed, in many species, the brain and individual brain regions often differ in size in domesticated strains compared with their wild ancestors. Although the majority of studies on mammals focus on cortical regions, the cerebellum often differs in relative and absolute size between domestic and wild strains, but more specific data on cell sizes and numbers are often lacking.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We quantified cerebellar anatomy in two domesticated strains (Long-Evans and Sprague-Dawley) and one wild type of brown rat (Rattus norvegicus). Using unbiased stereology, we measured the total cerebellum and its layers' volumes, as well as the number and size of Purkinje cells.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Long-Evans rats had a larger total cerebellum volume, in both absolute and relative terms, than Sprague-Dawley and wild rats, but no other significant differences were detected. Significant differences in the absolute and relative sizes of the molecular, granule cell, and white matter layers were also found, but the differences were inconsistent among strains such that the largest values alternated between the two laboratory strains. The absolute number of Purkinje cells did not differ among strains, but one population of Sprague-Dawley rats and the wild rats had more Purkinje cells relative to cerebellar volume. Last, Long-Evans rats had significantly smaller Purkinje cells than the other strains in both absolute and relative terms.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Only one of the two domesticated strains differed from wild rats in cerebellar anatomy. Our results therefore demonstrate that changes in the brains of domesticated animals do not necessarily follow a universal rule; they can vary between different strains. This highlights the importance of including more than one strain in wild-domesticate comparisons in brain anatomy and avoiding the oversimplification of the effects of domestication on the brain.</p>","PeriodicalId":56328,"journal":{"name":"Brain Behavior and Evolution","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Behavior and Evolution","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000546604","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Domestication and subsequent breed selection has significantly changed the phenotype of most domesticated animal species. Not only has their external appearance changed, in many species, the brain and individual brain regions often differ in size in domesticated strains compared with their wild ancestors. Although the majority of studies on mammals focus on cortical regions, the cerebellum often differs in relative and absolute size between domestic and wild strains, but more specific data on cell sizes and numbers are often lacking.

Methods: We quantified cerebellar anatomy in two domesticated strains (Long-Evans and Sprague-Dawley) and one wild type of brown rat (Rattus norvegicus). Using unbiased stereology, we measured the total cerebellum and its layers' volumes, as well as the number and size of Purkinje cells.

Results: Long-Evans rats had a larger total cerebellum volume, in both absolute and relative terms, than Sprague-Dawley and wild rats, but no other significant differences were detected. Significant differences in the absolute and relative sizes of the molecular, granule cell, and white matter layers were also found, but the differences were inconsistent among strains such that the largest values alternated between the two laboratory strains. The absolute number of Purkinje cells did not differ among strains, but one population of Sprague-Dawley rats and the wild rats had more Purkinje cells relative to cerebellar volume. Last, Long-Evans rats had significantly smaller Purkinje cells than the other strains in both absolute and relative terms.

Conclusion: Only one of the two domesticated strains differed from wild rats in cerebellar anatomy. Our results therefore demonstrate that changes in the brains of domesticated animals do not necessarily follow a universal rule; they can vary between different strains. This highlights the importance of including more than one strain in wild-domesticate comparisons in brain anatomy and avoiding the oversimplification of the effects of domestication on the brain.

实验室大鼠与野生大鼠小脑解剖的品系特异性差异。
驯化和随后的品种选择显著改变了大多数驯化动物物种的表型。不仅它们的外表发生了变化,而且在许多物种中,驯化菌株的大脑和单个大脑区域的大小往往与野生祖先不同。虽然大多数关于哺乳动物的研究都集中在皮质区域,但小脑在家养和野生菌株之间的相对和绝对大小往往不同,但关于细胞大小和数量的更具体的数据往往缺乏。方法:对2种驯化褐鼠(Long Evans和Sprague-Dawley)和1种野生褐鼠(Rattus norvegicus)进行小脑解剖定量分析。利用无偏立体学,我们测量了小脑及其层的总体积,以及浦肯野细胞的数量和大小。结果:Long Evans大鼠的小脑总体积在绝对和相对上均大于Sprague-Dawley大鼠和野生大鼠,但其他差异无统计学意义。分子层、颗粒细胞层和白质层的绝对尺寸和相对尺寸也存在显著差异,但菌株之间的差异不一致,最大的值在两种实验室菌株之间交替。不同品系间浦肯野细胞的绝对数量没有差异,但有一个种群的sd - dawley大鼠和野生大鼠的浦肯野细胞比小脑体积多。最后,Long Evan大鼠的浦肯野细胞无论在绝对数量还是相对数量上都明显小于其他菌株。结论:驯化菌株与野生大鼠在小脑解剖结构上只有1个存在差异。因此,我们的研究结果表明,驯化动物大脑的变化并不一定遵循一个普遍规律;它们可以在不同的菌株之间变化。这突出了在大脑解剖学中包括多个品种的野生驯化比较的重要性,并避免过度简化驯化对大脑的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brain Behavior and Evolution
Brain Behavior and Evolution 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
23.50%
发文量
31
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Brain, Behavior and Evolution'' is a journal with a loyal following, high standards, and a unique profile as the main outlet for the continuing scientific discourse on nervous system evolution. The journal publishes comparative neurobiological studies that focus on nervous system structure, function, or development in vertebrates as well as invertebrates. Approaches range from the molecular over the anatomical and physiological to the behavioral. Despite this diversity, most papers published in ''Brain, Behavior and Evolution'' include an evolutionary angle, at least in the discussion, and focus on neural mechanisms or phenomena. Some purely behavioral research may be within the journal’s scope, but the suitability of such manuscripts will be assessed on a case-by-case basis. The journal also publishes review articles that provide critical overviews of current topics in evolutionary neurobiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信