Alaina S Ritter, Vidya Kollu, Amanda Aspilcueta, Jennifer D Connolly, Eddie Manning, Lennox Archibald
{"title":"A retrospective case-control study of a cluster of surgical site infections after coronary artery bypass grafting at a tertiary medical center.","authors":"Alaina S Ritter, Vidya Kollu, Amanda Aspilcueta, Jennifer D Connolly, Eddie Manning, Lennox Archibald","doi":"10.1017/ash.2025.164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate a cluster of surgical site infections (SSIs) in patients who underwent coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) procedures, identify risk factors for infection, and implement measures to prevent new cases.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The investigation comprised a retrospective case-control study and an observational review of infection control practices between the fall of 2018 and 2019 (study period).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary care medical center in Florida, USA.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Patients who acquired an SSI following CABG during the study period were defined as case-patients. Control-patients were randomly selected patients who did not acquire a post-CABG SSI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recorded clinical and epidemiologic details on a standardized form and analyzed data with SAS statistical software. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven patients met the case definition and 21 control-patients were identified. While multiple variables were significant on univariate analysis, after controlling for confounding using multivariate analysis/logistic regression, only lower age (<i>P</i> < 0.0001) and meeting the requirements for appropriate perioperative temperature management (SCIP measure 10) (<i>P</i> = 0.01) were identified as independent risk factors for SSI. Per observational review, measures to reduce operating room traffic and limit door opening/closing were implemented and wound vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) use was phased out. Our institutional SSI rate returned to baseline and no additional clusters were seen in the following three years.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Multiple potential risk factors exist for SSI after coronary artery bypass grafting. At our institution, minimizing operating room traffic and reducing wound VAC use may have successfully addressed these healthcare-associated infections.</p>","PeriodicalId":72246,"journal":{"name":"Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE","volume":"5 1","pages":"e127"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12171944/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ash.2025.164","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To investigate a cluster of surgical site infections (SSIs) in patients who underwent coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) procedures, identify risk factors for infection, and implement measures to prevent new cases.
Design: The investigation comprised a retrospective case-control study and an observational review of infection control practices between the fall of 2018 and 2019 (study period).
Setting: Tertiary care medical center in Florida, USA.
Patients: Patients who acquired an SSI following CABG during the study period were defined as case-patients. Control-patients were randomly selected patients who did not acquire a post-CABG SSI.
Methods: We recorded clinical and epidemiologic details on a standardized form and analyzed data with SAS statistical software. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated.
Results: Seven patients met the case definition and 21 control-patients were identified. While multiple variables were significant on univariate analysis, after controlling for confounding using multivariate analysis/logistic regression, only lower age (P < 0.0001) and meeting the requirements for appropriate perioperative temperature management (SCIP measure 10) (P = 0.01) were identified as independent risk factors for SSI. Per observational review, measures to reduce operating room traffic and limit door opening/closing were implemented and wound vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) use was phased out. Our institutional SSI rate returned to baseline and no additional clusters were seen in the following three years.
Conclusions: Multiple potential risk factors exist for SSI after coronary artery bypass grafting. At our institution, minimizing operating room traffic and reducing wound VAC use may have successfully addressed these healthcare-associated infections.