Vaccine Hesitancy and Immunization Patterns in Central and Eastern Europe: Sociocultural, Economic, Political, and Digital Influences Across Seven Countries.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Pub Date : 2025-06-12 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/RMHP.S519479
Donata Kurpas, Dorota Stefanicka-Wojtas, Aneta Soll-Morka, Katarzyna Lomper, Bartosz Uchmanowicz, Beata Blahova, Aelita Bredelytė, Gheorghe Gindrovel Dumitra, Vladimíra Hudáčková, Katerina Javorska, Zoltán Juhász, Stanisław Manulik, András Mohos, Egidijus Skarbalius, Victoria I Tkachenko, Izabella Uchmanowicz
{"title":"Vaccine Hesitancy and Immunization Patterns in Central and Eastern Europe: Sociocultural, Economic, Political, and Digital Influences Across Seven Countries.","authors":"Donata Kurpas, Dorota Stefanicka-Wojtas, Aneta Soll-Morka, Katarzyna Lomper, Bartosz Uchmanowicz, Beata Blahova, Aelita Bredelytė, Gheorghe Gindrovel Dumitra, Vladimíra Hudáčková, Katerina Javorska, Zoltán Juhász, Stanisław Manulik, András Mohos, Egidijus Skarbalius, Victoria I Tkachenko, Izabella Uchmanowicz","doi":"10.2147/RMHP.S519479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>Vaccination programs are essential for preventing infectious diseases, yet the effectiveness of these programs varies significantly across Central and Eastern European countries due to diverse socio-economic, cultural, and political influences. This study examines vaccination trends in Hungary, Slovakia, Romania, the Czech Republic, Poland, Ukraine, and Lithuania, focusing on misinformation, regional healthcare disparities, and socio-cultural factors on vaccination rates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive review of national policies, vaccination rates, and factors influencing vaccine hesitancy was conducted across seven Central and Eastern European countries. Input from local health stakeholders and national data sources was analysed to contextualize vaccination patterns and challenges.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant cross-country variation was observed. Hungary and the Czech Republic reported consistently high coverage of mandatory childhood vaccinations, while Romania and Ukraine experienced severe declines in uptake, leading to outbreaks of measles and polio. Slovakia demonstrated low COVID-19 vaccination willingness, and Poland recorded a sharp increase in formal vaccine refusals. Conversely, Lithuania implemented successful campaigns that improved uptake, particularly for influenza and pneumococcal vaccines. Differences were influenced by healthcare system structure, public trust, exposure to misinformation, and digital communication strategies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Addressing vaccine hesitancy requires targeted, context-sensitive communication and digital literacy programs. Additionally, policy reforms to enhance accessibility, particularly in rural areas, and real-time monitoring systems can strengthen vaccination rates. Cross-border collaboration and tailored public health campaigns addressing cultural and socio-economic challenges are necessary to improve immunization coverage in these regions.</p>","PeriodicalId":56009,"journal":{"name":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","volume":"18 ","pages":"1911-1934"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12170812/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S519479","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/objectives: Vaccination programs are essential for preventing infectious diseases, yet the effectiveness of these programs varies significantly across Central and Eastern European countries due to diverse socio-economic, cultural, and political influences. This study examines vaccination trends in Hungary, Slovakia, Romania, the Czech Republic, Poland, Ukraine, and Lithuania, focusing on misinformation, regional healthcare disparities, and socio-cultural factors on vaccination rates.

Methods: A comprehensive review of national policies, vaccination rates, and factors influencing vaccine hesitancy was conducted across seven Central and Eastern European countries. Input from local health stakeholders and national data sources was analysed to contextualize vaccination patterns and challenges.

Results: Significant cross-country variation was observed. Hungary and the Czech Republic reported consistently high coverage of mandatory childhood vaccinations, while Romania and Ukraine experienced severe declines in uptake, leading to outbreaks of measles and polio. Slovakia demonstrated low COVID-19 vaccination willingness, and Poland recorded a sharp increase in formal vaccine refusals. Conversely, Lithuania implemented successful campaigns that improved uptake, particularly for influenza and pneumococcal vaccines. Differences were influenced by healthcare system structure, public trust, exposure to misinformation, and digital communication strategies.

Conclusion: Addressing vaccine hesitancy requires targeted, context-sensitive communication and digital literacy programs. Additionally, policy reforms to enhance accessibility, particularly in rural areas, and real-time monitoring systems can strengthen vaccination rates. Cross-border collaboration and tailored public health campaigns addressing cultural and socio-economic challenges are necessary to improve immunization coverage in these regions.

中欧和东欧的疫苗犹豫和免疫模式:七个国家的社会文化、经济、政治和数字影响。
背景/目的:疫苗接种计划对预防传染病至关重要,但由于不同的社会经济、文化和政治影响,这些计划的有效性在中欧和东欧国家差异很大。本研究考察了匈牙利、斯洛伐克、罗马尼亚、捷克共和国、波兰、乌克兰和立陶宛的疫苗接种趋势,重点关注误传、地区卫生保健差异以及影响疫苗接种率的社会文化因素。方法:对七个中欧和东欧国家的国家政策、疫苗接种率和影响疫苗犹豫的因素进行了全面审查。对来自地方卫生利益攸关方和国家数据来源的投入进行了分析,以便将疫苗接种模式和挑战置于背景之下。结果:观察到显著的跨国差异。匈牙利和捷克共和国报告说,强制性儿童疫苗接种的覆盖率一直很高,而罗马尼亚和乌克兰的接种率严重下降,导致麻疹和小儿麻痹症爆发。斯洛伐克表现出较低的COVID-19疫苗接种意愿,波兰正式拒绝接种疫苗的人数急剧增加。相反,立陶宛成功地开展了运动,提高了接种率,特别是流感和肺炎球菌疫苗的接种率。影响差异的因素包括医疗系统结构、公众信任、接触错误信息和数字沟通策略。结论:解决疫苗犹豫问题需要有针对性的、对环境敏感的沟通和数字扫盲计划。此外,加强可及性(特别是在农村地区)的政策改革和实时监测系统可以提高疫苗接种率。跨界合作和针对文化和社会经济挑战的量身定制的公共卫生运动对于提高这些地区的免疫覆盖率是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.90%
发文量
242
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Risk Management and Healthcare Policy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on all aspects of public health, policy and preventative measures to promote good health and improve morbidity and mortality in the population. Specific topics covered in the journal include: Public and community health Policy and law Preventative and predictive healthcare Risk and hazard management Epidemiology, detection and screening Lifestyle and diet modification Vaccination and disease transmission/modification programs Health and safety and occupational health Healthcare services provision Health literacy and education Advertising and promotion of health issues Health economic evaluations and resource management Risk Management and Healthcare Policy focuses on human interventional and observational research. The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, clinical and epidemiological studies, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, and extended reports. Case reports will only be considered if they make a valuable and original contribution to the literature. The journal does not accept study protocols, animal-based or cell line-based studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信