Multiplex IgE peanut panels: a critical appraisal of assay designs and the good, the bad, and the ugly features of the applied allergen components.

IF 3.3 Q2 ALLERGY
Frontiers in allergy Pub Date : 2025-06-02 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/falgy.2025.1515294
D de Boer, C J J Bijnens, M C Slot, C M G Nieuwhof, J A P Bons
{"title":"Multiplex IgE peanut panels: a critical appraisal of assay designs and the good, the bad, and the ugly features of the applied allergen components.","authors":"D de Boer, C J J Bijnens, M C Slot, C M G Nieuwhof, J A P Bons","doi":"10.3389/falgy.2025.1515294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multiplex allergy assays are currently well-established in allergy diagnostics. However, the different assays in terms of designs and performance are also claimed to be heterogeneous as no agreed standards and requirements are available.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to compare the analytical assay designs of the ISAC, ALEX, and EUROLINE peanut (Ara h) panels and the features of the applied isoallergens and variants to create more awareness of the heterogeneity of multiplex allergy assays.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a multi-source survey in publicly available data sources and among manufacturers and performed correlation studies using patients' serum samples.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The survey proved that the panels are indeed very heterogeneous in many ways, especially regarding the allergen component origin and isoallergen composition. Despite that, we found adequate correlations between IgE against the clinically relevant Ara h storage proteins measured by the panels. However, for the clinically relevant lipid transfer protein Ara h 9, the correlations were less adequate, which could be caused by the different Ara h 9 isoallergens used in the studied panels. For cross-reactive carbohydrate determinants (CCDs), the results were complicated, which also corresponds to the complex nature of CCDs and the different inhibition procedures. The detection of subpopulations of patients for all panallergens illustrated the heterogeneous nature of peanut IgE in general and of the peanut panels studied. Regarding the overall features provided for the three panels, we classified the peanut allergen components and CCDs by their good, bad, and even ugly features when used within these panels.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Knowledge of the origin and respective isoallergen specifications of the peanut allergen components including the exact CCD composition is essential. Together with that of the variants, this should be documented more adequately in scientific studies and in the respective instructions for the use of multiplex allergy assays.</p>","PeriodicalId":73062,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in allergy","volume":"6 ","pages":"1515294"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12171301/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in allergy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/falgy.2025.1515294","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Multiplex allergy assays are currently well-established in allergy diagnostics. However, the different assays in terms of designs and performance are also claimed to be heterogeneous as no agreed standards and requirements are available.

Objective: We aimed to compare the analytical assay designs of the ISAC, ALEX, and EUROLINE peanut (Ara h) panels and the features of the applied isoallergens and variants to create more awareness of the heterogeneity of multiplex allergy assays.

Methods: We conducted a multi-source survey in publicly available data sources and among manufacturers and performed correlation studies using patients' serum samples.

Results: The survey proved that the panels are indeed very heterogeneous in many ways, especially regarding the allergen component origin and isoallergen composition. Despite that, we found adequate correlations between IgE against the clinically relevant Ara h storage proteins measured by the panels. However, for the clinically relevant lipid transfer protein Ara h 9, the correlations were less adequate, which could be caused by the different Ara h 9 isoallergens used in the studied panels. For cross-reactive carbohydrate determinants (CCDs), the results were complicated, which also corresponds to the complex nature of CCDs and the different inhibition procedures. The detection of subpopulations of patients for all panallergens illustrated the heterogeneous nature of peanut IgE in general and of the peanut panels studied. Regarding the overall features provided for the three panels, we classified the peanut allergen components and CCDs by their good, bad, and even ugly features when used within these panels.

Conclusions: Knowledge of the origin and respective isoallergen specifications of the peanut allergen components including the exact CCD composition is essential. Together with that of the variants, this should be documented more adequately in scientific studies and in the respective instructions for the use of multiplex allergy assays.

多重IgE花生面板:对试验设计和应用过敏原成分的好、坏和丑陋特征的关键评估。
背景:多重变态反应试验目前在变态反应诊断中得到了很好的应用。然而,在设计和性能方面的不同分析也被认为是异质的,因为没有商定的标准和要求可用。目的:我们旨在比较ISAC, ALEX和EUROLINE花生(Ara h)面板的分析试验设计以及应用的等变应原和变异体的特征,以提高对多重过敏试验异质性的认识。方法:我们在公开数据来源和制造商中进行了多源调查,并使用患者血清样本进行了相关性研究。结果:调查证明,在许多方面,特别是在过敏原成分来源和等过敏原组成方面,面板确实存在很大的异质性。尽管如此,我们发现IgE与临床相关的Ara h储存蛋白之间存在足够的相关性。然而,对于临床相关的脂质转移蛋白Ara h9,相关性不太充分,这可能是由研究小组中使用的不同Ara h9等过敏原引起的。对于交叉反应性碳水化合物决定因子(CCDs),结果比较复杂,这也与CCDs的复杂性和不同的抑制程序相对应。所有pan过敏原患者亚群的检测说明了花生IgE总体和花生组研究的异质性。对于三个面板提供的整体功能,我们根据花生过敏原成分和ccd在这些面板中使用时的好,坏,甚至丑陋特征进行了分类。结论:了解花生过敏原成分的来源和各自的等应原规格,包括确切的CCD组成是必要的。与变异一起,这应该在科学研究和使用多重过敏试验的相应说明中得到更充分的记录。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信