Balancing benefit and risk: clinical considerations in the use of acetaminophen, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and dexamethasone for perioperative multimodal analgesia.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Boohwi Hong, Woosuk Chung, Chahyun Oh
{"title":"Balancing benefit and risk: clinical considerations in the use of acetaminophen, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and dexamethasone for perioperative multimodal analgesia.","authors":"Boohwi Hong, Woosuk Chung, Chahyun Oh","doi":"10.3344/kjp.25068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Multimodal analgesia, incorporating agents with diverse mechanisms of action, is a cornerstone of perioperative pain management, aiming to optimize analgesia while minimizing opioid-related adverse effects. Despite well-established guidelines, its adoption remains inconsistent due to entrenched practices and concerns about potential risks. This review focuses on the rationale and clinical considerations for foundational multimodal agents-acetaminophen, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and dexamethasone-highlighting their benefits, contraindications, and controversies. Evidence regarding key concerns, including hepatotoxicity, nephrotoxicity, anastomotic leakage, bleeding, infection, and hyperglycemia, is comprehensively reviewed. While these concerns are not entirely unfounded, clear supporting data is often limited, highlighting the importance of a critical and thorough evaluation of the available evidence. Indiscriminate advocacy for or reluctance to adopt multimodal analgesia is equally undesirable; instead, a balanced, evidence-based approach is necessary. By refining the understanding of these agents, practitioners can support the broader implementation of multimodal analgesia in perioperative care, ultimately improving patient recovery and optimizing postoperative outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":56252,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Pain","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3344/kjp.25068","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Multimodal analgesia, incorporating agents with diverse mechanisms of action, is a cornerstone of perioperative pain management, aiming to optimize analgesia while minimizing opioid-related adverse effects. Despite well-established guidelines, its adoption remains inconsistent due to entrenched practices and concerns about potential risks. This review focuses on the rationale and clinical considerations for foundational multimodal agents-acetaminophen, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and dexamethasone-highlighting their benefits, contraindications, and controversies. Evidence regarding key concerns, including hepatotoxicity, nephrotoxicity, anastomotic leakage, bleeding, infection, and hyperglycemia, is comprehensively reviewed. While these concerns are not entirely unfounded, clear supporting data is often limited, highlighting the importance of a critical and thorough evaluation of the available evidence. Indiscriminate advocacy for or reluctance to adopt multimodal analgesia is equally undesirable; instead, a balanced, evidence-based approach is necessary. By refining the understanding of these agents, practitioners can support the broader implementation of multimodal analgesia in perioperative care, ultimately improving patient recovery and optimizing postoperative outcomes.

权衡利弊:对乙酰氨基酚、非甾体抗炎药和地塞米松围手术期多模式镇痛的临床考虑
多模式镇痛,包括多种作用机制的药物,是围手术期疼痛管理的基石,旨在优化镇痛,同时最大限度地减少阿片类药物相关的不良反应。尽管有完善的指导方针,但由于根深蒂固的做法和对潜在风险的担忧,其采用仍然不一致。本文综述了基础多模式药物——对乙酰氨基酚、非甾体抗炎药和地塞米松的基本原理和临床考虑,重点介绍了它们的益处、禁忌症和争议。关于关键问题的证据,包括肝毒性、肾毒性、吻合口漏、出血、感染和高血糖,全面回顾。虽然这些担忧并非完全没有根据,但明确的支持数据往往有限,这突出了对现有证据进行批判性和彻底评估的重要性。不分青红皂白地提倡或不愿采用多模式镇痛同样是不可取的;相反,一种平衡的、以证据为基础的方法是必要的。通过完善对这些药物的理解,从业者可以支持在围手术期护理中更广泛地实施多模式镇痛,最终提高患者的康复和优化术后结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Korean Journal of Pain
Korean Journal of Pain Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
57
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Korean Journal of Pain (Korean J Pain, KJP) is the official journal of the Korean Pain Society, founded in 1986. It has been published since 1988. It publishes peer reviewed original articles related to all aspects of pain, including clinical and basic research, patient care, education, and health policy. It has been published quarterly in English since 2009 (on the first day of January, April, July, and October). In addition, it has also become the official journal of the International Spinal Pain Society since 2016. The mission of the Journal is to improve the care of patients in pain by providing a forum for clinical researchers, basic scientists, clinicians, and other health professionals. The circulation number per issue is 50.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信