Association of Patient-Reported Outcome Patterns and Major Clinical Factors with Frailty in Stable COPD.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Mengjiao Yang, Ziwei Wang, Yangyang Zhao, Jie He, Dier Lin, Yali Wang, Yang Liu
{"title":"Association of Patient-Reported Outcome Patterns and Major Clinical Factors with Frailty in Stable COPD.","authors":"Mengjiao Yang, Ziwei Wang, Yangyang Zhao, Jie He, Dier Lin, Yali Wang, Yang Liu","doi":"10.2147/COPD.S517270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exhibits heterogeneous symptom profiles across individuals. This study aimed to identify subgroups of patients with stable COPD according to physiological, psychological, and environmental symptoms; assess differences in their characteristics; and examine the association of symptom patterns with frailty.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We analyzed data from the second wave of a cohort study involving patients with COPD reassessed 6 months after hospitalization for acute exacerbations. Frailty and patient-reported outcomes were measured using the FRAIL and Modified COPD-Patient-Reported Outcome (mCOPD-PRO) scales. Latent profile analysis identified subgroups based on mCOPD-PRO symptom patterns. Differences across symptom severity subgroups were assessed using post-hoc trend analyses and chi-square tests for trends. Multinomial logistic regression quantified the magnitude of differences between subgroups. The relationship between subgroups, clinical factors, and frailty was examined through linear regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 308 patients with stable COPD, three subgroups were identified: \"low-symptom\" (27.9%), \"moderate-symptom\" (51.3%), and \"severe-symptom\" (20.8%). Body mass index, Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease stage (GOLD), COPD Assessment Test (CAT) score, modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) score, and physical activity exhibited significant linear trends across subgroups of increasing symptom severity. Frailty scores differed significantly: 0.50 ± 0.78 in the low-symptom group, 1.34 ± 0.96 in the moderate-symptom group, and 2.72 ± 0.95 in the severe-symptom group. Multivariate analysis identified severe-symptom group (β coefficient [β]=0.62, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.21-1.03), rural residence (β=0.21, 95% CI: 0.04-0.39), GOLD (β=0.23, 95% CI: 0.07-0.39), mMRC (β=0.17, 95% CI: 0.03-0.31), and CAT score (β=0.04, 95% CI: 0.02-0.06) associated with frailty.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with stable COPD can be categorized based on patient-reported outcomes, with differences in demographic and disease characteristics across subgroups. Patients with severe COPD symptoms revealed higher levels of frailty compared to those with low symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":48818,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","volume":"20 ","pages":"1927-1937"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12170799/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S517270","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exhibits heterogeneous symptom profiles across individuals. This study aimed to identify subgroups of patients with stable COPD according to physiological, psychological, and environmental symptoms; assess differences in their characteristics; and examine the association of symptom patterns with frailty.

Patients and methods: We analyzed data from the second wave of a cohort study involving patients with COPD reassessed 6 months after hospitalization for acute exacerbations. Frailty and patient-reported outcomes were measured using the FRAIL and Modified COPD-Patient-Reported Outcome (mCOPD-PRO) scales. Latent profile analysis identified subgroups based on mCOPD-PRO symptom patterns. Differences across symptom severity subgroups were assessed using post-hoc trend analyses and chi-square tests for trends. Multinomial logistic regression quantified the magnitude of differences between subgroups. The relationship between subgroups, clinical factors, and frailty was examined through linear regression.

Results: Among 308 patients with stable COPD, three subgroups were identified: "low-symptom" (27.9%), "moderate-symptom" (51.3%), and "severe-symptom" (20.8%). Body mass index, Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease stage (GOLD), COPD Assessment Test (CAT) score, modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) score, and physical activity exhibited significant linear trends across subgroups of increasing symptom severity. Frailty scores differed significantly: 0.50 ± 0.78 in the low-symptom group, 1.34 ± 0.96 in the moderate-symptom group, and 2.72 ± 0.95 in the severe-symptom group. Multivariate analysis identified severe-symptom group (β coefficient [β]=0.62, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.21-1.03), rural residence (β=0.21, 95% CI: 0.04-0.39), GOLD (β=0.23, 95% CI: 0.07-0.39), mMRC (β=0.17, 95% CI: 0.03-0.31), and CAT score (β=0.04, 95% CI: 0.02-0.06) associated with frailty.

Conclusion: Patients with stable COPD can be categorized based on patient-reported outcomes, with differences in demographic and disease characteristics across subgroups. Patients with severe COPD symptoms revealed higher levels of frailty compared to those with low symptoms.

稳定性COPD患者报告的结果模式和主要临床因素与虚弱的关系
目的:慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)在个体中表现出不同的症状特征。本研究旨在根据生理、心理和环境症状确定稳定期COPD患者亚组;评估他们特征上的差异;并检查症状模式与虚弱的关系。患者和方法:我们分析了一项队列研究的第二波数据,该研究涉及COPD患者在急性加重住院6个月后重新评估。虚弱和患者报告的结果使用虚弱和修改的copd -患者报告的结果(mCOPD-PRO)量表进行测量。基于mCOPD-PRO症状模式的潜在特征分析确定了亚组。使用事后趋势分析和卡方检验评估症状严重程度亚组之间的差异。多项逻辑回归量化了亚组间差异的大小。通过线性回归检验亚组、临床因素和虚弱之间的关系。结果:308例稳定期COPD患者分为“低症状”(27.9%)、“中度症状”(51.3%)和“重度症状”(20.8%)三个亚组。体重指数、全球慢性阻塞性肺疾病分级倡议(GOLD)、COPD评估测试(CAT)评分、修正医学研究委员会(mMRC)评分和身体活动在症状严重程度增加的亚组中表现出显著的线性趋势。两组的衰弱评分差异有统计学意义:轻度症状组为0.50±0.78,中度症状组为1.34±0.96,重度症状组为2.72±0.95。多因素分析发现,重度症状组(β系数[β]=0.62, 95%可信区间[CI]: 0.21-1.03)、农村居住(β=0.21, 95% CI: 0.04-0.39)、GOLD (β=0.23, 95% CI: 0.07-0.39)、mMRC (β=0.17, 95% CI: 0.03-0.31)和CAT评分(β=0.04, 95% CI: 0.02-0.06)与虚弱相关。结论:稳定期COPD患者可以根据患者报告的预后进行分类,但亚组间的人口统计学和疾病特征存在差异。与症状较轻的患者相比,有严重慢性阻塞性肺病症状的患者表现出更高的虚弱程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.70%
发文量
372
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: An international, peer-reviewed journal of therapeutics and pharmacology focusing on concise rapid reporting of clinical studies and reviews in COPD. Special focus will be given to the pathophysiological processes underlying the disease, intervention programs, patient focused education, and self management protocols. This journal is directed at specialists and healthcare professionals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信