A Meta-Analysis on the Effect of Depression on Adherence to Medication for Opioid Use Disorder.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Taylor R Fox, Anna C S Garrison, Kyle S Minor, Jesse C Stewart, Melissa A Cyders
{"title":"A Meta-Analysis on the Effect of Depression on Adherence to Medication for Opioid Use Disorder.","authors":"Taylor R Fox, Anna C S Garrison, Kyle S Minor, Jesse C Stewart, Melissa A Cyders","doi":"10.1080/15504263.2025.2515018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved medications for Opioid Use Disorder (MOUD) effectively reduce opioid cravings, use, relapse, and overdose. However, adherence to MOUD is a significant challenge. Depression relates to poorer adherence across several medical conditions and may be a prime factor relating to poor MOUD adherence. The goal of this meta-analysis is to quantify the relationship between depression and MOUD adherence and to identify moderators of this association. <b>Methods:</b> A systematic literature search was conducted using PsycINFO, PubMed, Embase, and Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature [CINAHL] databases. Pearson's <i>r</i> was used for the effect size statistic. A random effects model was utilized for all effect size analyses. <b>Results:</b> Nine studies met eligibility criteria, with a total of 3493 participants. Higher baseline depressive symptoms were found to predict greater prospective adherence to MOUD (<i>r</i> = 0.130, 95% <i>CI</i>: 0.060-0.199, <i>p</i> < .001). This effect was not moderated by the MOUD type or depression measurement type. <b>Conclusions:</b> In contrast to prior medical adherence research, depression predicted better, not poorer, adherence to MOUD. The literature was limited by few studies examining naltrexone, limited diversity of samples, and a lack of clear consensus on adherence measurement. Future research should test whether this relationship extends to naltrexone; use samples with more racial minorities, women and gender minorities, and inpatient samples; clearly define and measure adherence, and identify mechanisms and moderators of this relationship, to best inform future clinical applications and improve outcomes for those with OUD.</p>","PeriodicalId":46571,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dual Diagnosis","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dual Diagnosis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15504263.2025.2515018","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved medications for Opioid Use Disorder (MOUD) effectively reduce opioid cravings, use, relapse, and overdose. However, adherence to MOUD is a significant challenge. Depression relates to poorer adherence across several medical conditions and may be a prime factor relating to poor MOUD adherence. The goal of this meta-analysis is to quantify the relationship between depression and MOUD adherence and to identify moderators of this association. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted using PsycINFO, PubMed, Embase, and Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature [CINAHL] databases. Pearson's r was used for the effect size statistic. A random effects model was utilized for all effect size analyses. Results: Nine studies met eligibility criteria, with a total of 3493 participants. Higher baseline depressive symptoms were found to predict greater prospective adherence to MOUD (r = 0.130, 95% CI: 0.060-0.199, p < .001). This effect was not moderated by the MOUD type or depression measurement type. Conclusions: In contrast to prior medical adherence research, depression predicted better, not poorer, adherence to MOUD. The literature was limited by few studies examining naltrexone, limited diversity of samples, and a lack of clear consensus on adherence measurement. Future research should test whether this relationship extends to naltrexone; use samples with more racial minorities, women and gender minorities, and inpatient samples; clearly define and measure adherence, and identify mechanisms and moderators of this relationship, to best inform future clinical applications and improve outcomes for those with OUD.

抑郁症对阿片类药物使用障碍药物依从性影响的meta分析。
目的:美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)批准的阿片类药物使用障碍(mod)有效减少阿片类药物的渴望、使用、复发和过量。然而,坚持使用mod是一项重大挑战。抑郁症与多种医疗条件下较差的依从性有关,可能是与较差的mod依从性相关的主要因素。本荟萃分析的目的是量化抑郁与mod依从性之间的关系,并确定这种关联的调节因子。方法:采用PsycINFO、PubMed、Embase和护理与相关健康文献累积索引数据库(CINAHL)进行系统文献检索。效应量统计量采用Pearson’s r。所有效应量分析均采用随机效应模型。结果:9项研究符合入选标准,共有3493名受试者。较高的基线抑郁症状预示着更大的mod依从性(r = 0.130, 95% CI: 0.060-0.199, p < 0.001)。这种效应不受抑郁类型或抑郁测量类型的影响。结论:与之前的药物依从性研究相比,抑郁症对药物依从性的预测更好,而不是更差。研究纳曲酮的研究很少,样本的多样性有限,对依从性测量缺乏明确的共识,这些文献都受到限制。未来的研究应该测试这种关系是否延伸到纳曲酮;使用更多种族少数群体、妇女和性别少数群体和住院患者样本的样本;明确定义和衡量依从性,并确定这种关系的机制和调节因素,以便为未来的临床应用提供最好的信息,并改善OUD患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
13.60%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: Journal of Dual Diagnosis is a quarterly, international publication that focuses on the full spectrum of complexities regarding dual diagnosis. The co-occurrence of mental health and substance use disorders, or “dual diagnosis,” is one of the quintessential issues in behavioral health. Why do such high rates of co-occurrence exist? What does it tell us about risk profiles? How do these linked disorders affect people, their families, and the communities in which they live? What are the natural paths to recovery? What specific treatments are most helpful and how can new ones be developed? How can we enhance the implementation of evidence-based practices at clinical, administrative, and policy levels? How can we help clients to learn active recovery skills and adopt needed supports, clinicians to master new interventions, programs to implement effective services, and communities to foster healthy adjustment? The Journal addresses each of these perplexing challenges.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信