Taylor R Fox, Anna C S Garrison, Kyle S Minor, Jesse C Stewart, Melissa A Cyders
{"title":"A Meta-Analysis on the Effect of Depression on Adherence to Medication for Opioid Use Disorder.","authors":"Taylor R Fox, Anna C S Garrison, Kyle S Minor, Jesse C Stewart, Melissa A Cyders","doi":"10.1080/15504263.2025.2515018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved medications for Opioid Use Disorder (MOUD) effectively reduce opioid cravings, use, relapse, and overdose. However, adherence to MOUD is a significant challenge. Depression relates to poorer adherence across several medical conditions and may be a prime factor relating to poor MOUD adherence. The goal of this meta-analysis is to quantify the relationship between depression and MOUD adherence and to identify moderators of this association. <b>Methods:</b> A systematic literature search was conducted using PsycINFO, PubMed, Embase, and Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature [CINAHL] databases. Pearson's <i>r</i> was used for the effect size statistic. A random effects model was utilized for all effect size analyses. <b>Results:</b> Nine studies met eligibility criteria, with a total of 3493 participants. Higher baseline depressive symptoms were found to predict greater prospective adherence to MOUD (<i>r</i> = 0.130, 95% <i>CI</i>: 0.060-0.199, <i>p</i> < .001). This effect was not moderated by the MOUD type or depression measurement type. <b>Conclusions:</b> In contrast to prior medical adherence research, depression predicted better, not poorer, adherence to MOUD. The literature was limited by few studies examining naltrexone, limited diversity of samples, and a lack of clear consensus on adherence measurement. Future research should test whether this relationship extends to naltrexone; use samples with more racial minorities, women and gender minorities, and inpatient samples; clearly define and measure adherence, and identify mechanisms and moderators of this relationship, to best inform future clinical applications and improve outcomes for those with OUD.</p>","PeriodicalId":46571,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dual Diagnosis","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dual Diagnosis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15504263.2025.2515018","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved medications for Opioid Use Disorder (MOUD) effectively reduce opioid cravings, use, relapse, and overdose. However, adherence to MOUD is a significant challenge. Depression relates to poorer adherence across several medical conditions and may be a prime factor relating to poor MOUD adherence. The goal of this meta-analysis is to quantify the relationship between depression and MOUD adherence and to identify moderators of this association. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted using PsycINFO, PubMed, Embase, and Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature [CINAHL] databases. Pearson's r was used for the effect size statistic. A random effects model was utilized for all effect size analyses. Results: Nine studies met eligibility criteria, with a total of 3493 participants. Higher baseline depressive symptoms were found to predict greater prospective adherence to MOUD (r = 0.130, 95% CI: 0.060-0.199, p < .001). This effect was not moderated by the MOUD type or depression measurement type. Conclusions: In contrast to prior medical adherence research, depression predicted better, not poorer, adherence to MOUD. The literature was limited by few studies examining naltrexone, limited diversity of samples, and a lack of clear consensus on adherence measurement. Future research should test whether this relationship extends to naltrexone; use samples with more racial minorities, women and gender minorities, and inpatient samples; clearly define and measure adherence, and identify mechanisms and moderators of this relationship, to best inform future clinical applications and improve outcomes for those with OUD.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Dual Diagnosis is a quarterly, international publication that focuses on the full spectrum of complexities regarding dual diagnosis. The co-occurrence of mental health and substance use disorders, or “dual diagnosis,” is one of the quintessential issues in behavioral health. Why do such high rates of co-occurrence exist? What does it tell us about risk profiles? How do these linked disorders affect people, their families, and the communities in which they live? What are the natural paths to recovery? What specific treatments are most helpful and how can new ones be developed? How can we enhance the implementation of evidence-based practices at clinical, administrative, and policy levels? How can we help clients to learn active recovery skills and adopt needed supports, clinicians to master new interventions, programs to implement effective services, and communities to foster healthy adjustment? The Journal addresses each of these perplexing challenges.