Adherence to Repeat Screening Completion for Colorectal Cancer Using the Multi-Target Stool DNA Test: Real-World Analysis of Patients from Federally Qualified Health Centers.
Mallik Greene, Timo Pew, Jorge Zapatier, Juliana Vanessa Rincón López, Paul Limburg, Martha Duarte
{"title":"Adherence to Repeat Screening Completion for Colorectal Cancer Using the Multi-Target Stool DNA Test: Real-World Analysis of Patients from Federally Qualified Health Centers.","authors":"Mallik Greene, Timo Pew, Jorge Zapatier, Juliana Vanessa Rincón López, Paul Limburg, Martha Duarte","doi":"10.1177/21501319251348099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction/objectives: </strong>This real-world study examined adherence to repeat mt-sDNA among patients from federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) across the US and among different payer types.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from Exact Sciences Laboratories, LLC were used for the period between January 1, 2023, and December 31, 2023, for those who had previously completed a mt-sDNA test. Study outcomes included adherence rate to mt-sDNA repeat screening and time to test return.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study sample consisted of 19 536 eligible patients. The mt-sDNA repeat screening adherence rate was 79.7%, and the mean time to return the kit was 21.1 ± 20.8 days. Repeat screening adherence for patients with Medicare was 84.7%, Medicare Advantage was 80%, commercial insurance was 78.2%, managed care organization was 74.6%, and Medicaid was 65.9% (<i>P</i> < .001). Compared with patients covered by commercial insurance, those covered by Medicaid had 42% lower odds of adhering to mt-sDNA repeat screening. Patients with 2 or more prior successful tests had a numerically shorter mean time to test return compared to those with only 1 prior successful test.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While repeat screening adherence was generally high across patient demographic categories, there were significant differences by type of insurance coverage and number of prior successful mt-sDNA screenings.</p>","PeriodicalId":46723,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Primary Care and Community Health","volume":"16 ","pages":"21501319251348099"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12174683/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Primary Care and Community Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21501319251348099","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction/objectives: This real-world study examined adherence to repeat mt-sDNA among patients from federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) across the US and among different payer types.
Methods: Data from Exact Sciences Laboratories, LLC were used for the period between January 1, 2023, and December 31, 2023, for those who had previously completed a mt-sDNA test. Study outcomes included adherence rate to mt-sDNA repeat screening and time to test return.
Results: The study sample consisted of 19 536 eligible patients. The mt-sDNA repeat screening adherence rate was 79.7%, and the mean time to return the kit was 21.1 ± 20.8 days. Repeat screening adherence for patients with Medicare was 84.7%, Medicare Advantage was 80%, commercial insurance was 78.2%, managed care organization was 74.6%, and Medicaid was 65.9% (P < .001). Compared with patients covered by commercial insurance, those covered by Medicaid had 42% lower odds of adhering to mt-sDNA repeat screening. Patients with 2 or more prior successful tests had a numerically shorter mean time to test return compared to those with only 1 prior successful test.
Conclusions: While repeat screening adherence was generally high across patient demographic categories, there were significant differences by type of insurance coverage and number of prior successful mt-sDNA screenings.