Enhancing Evidence-Based Practice Implementation in Acute Care: A Qualitative Case Study of Nurses' Roles, Interprofessional Collaboration, and Professional Development.

IF 2.9 Q2 NURSING
Jude Ominyi, Adewale Alabi
{"title":"Enhancing Evidence-Based Practice Implementation in Acute Care: A Qualitative Case Study of Nurses' Roles, Interprofessional Collaboration, and Professional Development.","authors":"Jude Ominyi, Adewale Alabi","doi":"10.1177/08445621251351056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background and PurposeEvidence-based practice (EBP) is essential for improving patient outcomes and healthcare quality. However, its implementation in acute care remains inconsistent due to organisational hierarchies, professional silos, and limited access to continuous professional development (CPD). Nurses play a key role in translating research into practice but often encounter barriers that limit their ability to lead EBP initiatives. Interprofessional collaboration and CPD are recognised enablers of EBP, yet their impact in acute care requires further investigation. This study explores how interprofessional collaboration, nurse-led initiatives, and CPD influence EBP adoption.Methods and ProceduresA collective qualitative case study was conducted across two acute care hospitals in the East Midlands, England. Data collection included 25 semi-structured interviews, nonparticipant observations, and document analysis over six years, with an intensive fieldwork phase in 2022. Thematic analysis was used to identify key patterns related to EBP adoption, interprofessional collaboration, and nurse-led knowledge implementation.ResultsNurses actively advocated for EBP integration but often worked independently due to the absence of formal collaboration structures. Interprofessional collaboration facilitated knowledge-sharing and decision-making, yet hierarchical constraints limited nurses' influence in clinical governance. CPD enhanced nurses' confidence and ability to challenge outdated practices, but disparities in access led to inconsistent EBP engagement across nursing teams.ConclusionStructured CPD, interdisciplinary collaboration, and inclusive decision-making are essential for EBP adoption. Addressing hierarchical constraints and resource limitations is crucial for sustaining evidence-driven care. Future research should explore the long-term sustainability of EBP implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":46661,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Nursing Research","volume":" ","pages":"8445621251351056"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Nursing Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08445621251351056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and PurposeEvidence-based practice (EBP) is essential for improving patient outcomes and healthcare quality. However, its implementation in acute care remains inconsistent due to organisational hierarchies, professional silos, and limited access to continuous professional development (CPD). Nurses play a key role in translating research into practice but often encounter barriers that limit their ability to lead EBP initiatives. Interprofessional collaboration and CPD are recognised enablers of EBP, yet their impact in acute care requires further investigation. This study explores how interprofessional collaboration, nurse-led initiatives, and CPD influence EBP adoption.Methods and ProceduresA collective qualitative case study was conducted across two acute care hospitals in the East Midlands, England. Data collection included 25 semi-structured interviews, nonparticipant observations, and document analysis over six years, with an intensive fieldwork phase in 2022. Thematic analysis was used to identify key patterns related to EBP adoption, interprofessional collaboration, and nurse-led knowledge implementation.ResultsNurses actively advocated for EBP integration but often worked independently due to the absence of formal collaboration structures. Interprofessional collaboration facilitated knowledge-sharing and decision-making, yet hierarchical constraints limited nurses' influence in clinical governance. CPD enhanced nurses' confidence and ability to challenge outdated practices, but disparities in access led to inconsistent EBP engagement across nursing teams.ConclusionStructured CPD, interdisciplinary collaboration, and inclusive decision-making are essential for EBP adoption. Addressing hierarchical constraints and resource limitations is crucial for sustaining evidence-driven care. Future research should explore the long-term sustainability of EBP implementation.

加强循证实践在急症护理中的实施:护士角色、跨专业合作和专业发展的定性案例研究。
背景和目的循证实践(EBP)对于改善患者预后和医疗保健质量至关重要。然而,由于组织等级、专业竖井和持续专业发展(CPD)的有限机会,其在急性护理中的实施仍然不一致。护士在将研究转化为实践方面发挥着关键作用,但经常遇到障碍,限制了他们领导EBP倡议的能力。跨专业合作和CPD是公认的EBP的推动者,但它们对急性护理的影响需要进一步研究。本研究探讨了跨专业合作、护士主导的倡议和CPD如何影响EBP的采用。方法和程序在英格兰东米德兰兹的两家急症护理医院进行了集体定性案例研究。数据收集包括25次半结构化访谈,非参与性观察和六年的文件分析,并在2022年进行了密集的实地调查阶段。主题分析用于确定与EBP采用、跨专业合作和护士主导的知识实施相关的关键模式。结果护士积极倡导EBP整合,但由于缺乏正式的协作结构,往往独立工作。跨专业合作促进了知识共享和决策,但等级限制限制了护士在临床治理中的影响。CPD增强了护士的信心和挑战过时做法的能力,但在获取方面的差异导致护理团队之间不一致的EBP参与。结论结构化CPD、跨学科合作和包容性决策是实施EBP的必要条件。解决层级限制和资源限制问题对于维持循证驱动的护理至关重要。未来的研究应探讨EBP实施的长期可持续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.80%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: We are pleased to announce the launch of the CJNR digital archive, an online archive available through the McGill University Library, and hosted by the McGill University Library Digital Collections Program in perpetuity. This archive has been made possible through a Richard M. Tomlinson Digital Library Innovation and Access Award to the McGill School of Nursing. The Richard M. Tomlinson award recognizes the ongoing contribution and commitment the CJNR has made to the McGill School of Nursing, and to the development and nursing science in Canada and worldwide. We hope this archive proves to be an invaluable research tool for researchers in Nursing and other faculties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信