Herbal Medicine for Treating Herpes Labialis: A Systematic Review.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Melanie Anheyer, Holger Cramer, Thomas Ostermann, Alfred Längler, Dennis Anheyer
{"title":"Herbal Medicine for Treating Herpes Labialis: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Melanie Anheyer, Holger Cramer, Thomas Ostermann, Alfred Längler, Dennis Anheyer","doi":"10.1089/jicm.2025.0131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Herpes labialis, commonly caused by herpes simplex virus type 1, affects millions globally and is traditionally managed with nucleoside antiviral drugs. However, increasing interest in complementary and integrative therapies has led to the exploration of topical herbal treatments as potential alternatives or adjuncts in managing this condition. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A systematic review was conducted in accordance with Cochrane guidelines and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses recommendations, with prior registration. A comprehensive search of Medline/PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was performed from inception to June 17, 2024. After screening 7,386 nonduplicate records and assessing 346 full-text articles, 7 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) encompassing 1,250 patients were included. Data were extracted regarding intervention types, outcomes, and adverse events, and the risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The included studies evaluated topical formulations of lemon balm (<i>Melissa officinalis</i> L.), olive leaf extract (<i>Olea europaea</i> L.), propolis, and a combined sage-rhubarb cream (<i>Salvia officinalis</i> L., <i>Rheum palmatum</i> L., and <i>Rheum officinale</i> Baill.). Lemon balm preparations consistently reduced pain intensity and swelling, with some studies also reporting a significant decrease in lesion size compared with placebo or acyclovir. Olive leaf extract demonstrated a statistically significant faster improvement in symptoms and a shorter healing time compared with acyclovir. Compared with acyclovir, propolis formulations significantly shortened the median time to lesion encrustation and complete healing compared with acyclovir, and the combined sage-rhubarb cream showed a comparable efficacy to acyclovir in mean healing time. Overall, the risk of bias was judged to be low in two trials, while five trials raised some concerns. The total sample size across studies was small, potentially limiting the generalizability of the results. Across all studies, adverse events were minimal or absent. <b><i>Discussion:</i></b> The findings indicate that topical herbal therapies may provide effective and well-tolerated alternatives or adjuncts to conventional antiviral treatments for herpes labialis. However, considerable heterogeneity in intervention protocols and outcome measures, as well as the underrepresentation of pediatric populations, limit the generalizability of these findings. <b><i>Conclusion</i>:</b> Topical herbal interventions, including lemon balm, olive leaf extract, propolis, and sage-rhubarb formulations, demonstrate potential benefits in managing herpes labialis with favorable safety profiles. Future well-designed, large-scale RCTs employing standardized methodologies are necessary to confirm these findings and to establish optimal treatment protocols for diverse patient populations (Inplasy protocol number: 202350038).</p>","PeriodicalId":29734,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jicm.2025.0131","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Herpes labialis, commonly caused by herpes simplex virus type 1, affects millions globally and is traditionally managed with nucleoside antiviral drugs. However, increasing interest in complementary and integrative therapies has led to the exploration of topical herbal treatments as potential alternatives or adjuncts in managing this condition. Methods: A systematic review was conducted in accordance with Cochrane guidelines and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses recommendations, with prior registration. A comprehensive search of Medline/PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was performed from inception to June 17, 2024. After screening 7,386 nonduplicate records and assessing 346 full-text articles, 7 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) encompassing 1,250 patients were included. Data were extracted regarding intervention types, outcomes, and adverse events, and the risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. Results: The included studies evaluated topical formulations of lemon balm (Melissa officinalis L.), olive leaf extract (Olea europaea L.), propolis, and a combined sage-rhubarb cream (Salvia officinalis L., Rheum palmatum L., and Rheum officinale Baill.). Lemon balm preparations consistently reduced pain intensity and swelling, with some studies also reporting a significant decrease in lesion size compared with placebo or acyclovir. Olive leaf extract demonstrated a statistically significant faster improvement in symptoms and a shorter healing time compared with acyclovir. Compared with acyclovir, propolis formulations significantly shortened the median time to lesion encrustation and complete healing compared with acyclovir, and the combined sage-rhubarb cream showed a comparable efficacy to acyclovir in mean healing time. Overall, the risk of bias was judged to be low in two trials, while five trials raised some concerns. The total sample size across studies was small, potentially limiting the generalizability of the results. Across all studies, adverse events were minimal or absent. Discussion: The findings indicate that topical herbal therapies may provide effective and well-tolerated alternatives or adjuncts to conventional antiviral treatments for herpes labialis. However, considerable heterogeneity in intervention protocols and outcome measures, as well as the underrepresentation of pediatric populations, limit the generalizability of these findings. Conclusion: Topical herbal interventions, including lemon balm, olive leaf extract, propolis, and sage-rhubarb formulations, demonstrate potential benefits in managing herpes labialis with favorable safety profiles. Future well-designed, large-scale RCTs employing standardized methodologies are necessary to confirm these findings and to establish optimal treatment protocols for diverse patient populations (Inplasy protocol number: 202350038).

治疗唇疱疹的草药:系统综述。
简介:唇疱疹通常由1型单纯疱疹病毒引起,影响全球数百万人,传统上使用核苷类抗病毒药物进行治疗。然而,对补充和综合疗法的兴趣日益增加,导致局部草药治疗作为潜在的替代或辅助治疗这种情况的探索。方法:根据Cochrane指南和系统评价和荟萃分析推荐的首选报告项目进行系统评价,并进行事先登记。对Medline/PubMed、Scopus和Cochrane中央对照试验注册库进行了全面的检索,从开始到2024年6月17日。在筛选了7386份非重复记录并评估了346篇全文文章后,纳入了7项随机对照试验(rct),包括1250名患者。提取有关干预类型、结局和不良事件的数据,并使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具评估偏倚风险。结果:纳入的研究评估了柠檬香蜂草(Melissa officinalis L.)、橄榄叶提取物(Olea europaea L.)、蜂胶和鼠尾草-大黄联合乳膏(鼠尾草、大黄和大黄)的局部配方。柠檬香蜂草制剂持续减少疼痛强度和肿胀,一些研究也报告了与安慰剂或阿昔洛韦相比,病变大小显著减少。与阿昔洛韦相比,橄榄叶提取物在改善症状和缩短愈合时间方面具有统计学意义。与阿昔洛韦相比,蜂胶制剂明显缩短了病灶结痂和完全愈合的中位时间,鼠尾草-大黄联合乳膏的平均愈合时间与阿昔洛韦相当。总的来说,两项试验的偏倚风险被认为是低的,而五项试验提出了一些担忧。所有研究的总样本量很小,可能限制了结果的普遍性。在所有的研究中,不良事件很少或没有发生。讨论:研究结果表明,局部草药治疗可能为传统的唇疱疹抗病毒治疗提供有效且耐受性良好的替代或辅助治疗。然而,干预方案和结果测量的相当大的异质性,以及儿科人群的代表性不足,限制了这些发现的普遍性。结论:局部草药干预,包括柠檬香蜂草、橄榄叶提取物、蜂胶和鼠尾草大黄配方,在治疗唇疱疹方面显示出潜在的益处,并且具有良好的安全性。未来需要采用标准化方法的精心设计的大规模随机对照试验来证实这些发现,并为不同的患者群体建立最佳治疗方案(Inplasy方案号:202350038)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信