An ex vivo comparison of jejunal transection angles and the effect on lumen diameter following end-to-end jejunojejunal anastomoses.

IF 1.3 2区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Christopher M Baldwin, Alexandra Gillen
{"title":"An ex vivo comparison of jejunal transection angles and the effect on lumen diameter following end-to-end jejunojejunal anastomoses.","authors":"Christopher M Baldwin, Alexandra Gillen","doi":"10.1111/vsu.14294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate three different jejunal transection angles for end-to-end jejunojejunostomies, comparing construction time, lumen size, and suture number.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Ex vivo cadaver study.</p><p><strong>Sample population: </strong>Eight euthanized horses each had three mid-jejunal specimens harvested.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Jejunal segments were assigned to one of three groups (A30, A45, and A60) and transected at 30, 45, or 60°, respectively. Following transection, a standardized handsewn single-layer interrupted modified Lembert anastomosis was performed, and construction time and number of sutures placed were recorded. Anastomotic index (AI) was calculated. Statistical analysis was performed using a one-way ANOVA. Statistical significance was set at p < .05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Transected jejunal lengths increased as the transection angle decreased (p < .001). Anastomoses construction time was not different between groups (p = .301). The number of sutures required to complete the anastomosis was higher (p = .026) for A30 compared to A60 but was not different between A60 and A45 or A45 and A30 (p > .333). Mean AI were 93.37, 114.29, and 135.07 for groups A60, A45, and A30 and the AI increased as the transection angle decreased (p < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A 60° transection angle reduced lumen size at the anastomosis but a 45 and 30° transection angle resulted in an increased lumen size at the anastomosis. The 45° angle did not increase the number of sutures required. The 30° angle significantly increased the number of sutures required.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>A 45° angle of transection does not result in increased surgical time or number of sutures placed. Further investigation is required to determine the ideal angle of transection.</p>","PeriodicalId":23667,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/vsu.14294","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate three different jejunal transection angles for end-to-end jejunojejunostomies, comparing construction time, lumen size, and suture number.

Study design: Ex vivo cadaver study.

Sample population: Eight euthanized horses each had three mid-jejunal specimens harvested.

Methods: Jejunal segments were assigned to one of three groups (A30, A45, and A60) and transected at 30, 45, or 60°, respectively. Following transection, a standardized handsewn single-layer interrupted modified Lembert anastomosis was performed, and construction time and number of sutures placed were recorded. Anastomotic index (AI) was calculated. Statistical analysis was performed using a one-way ANOVA. Statistical significance was set at p < .05.

Results: Transected jejunal lengths increased as the transection angle decreased (p < .001). Anastomoses construction time was not different between groups (p = .301). The number of sutures required to complete the anastomosis was higher (p = .026) for A30 compared to A60 but was not different between A60 and A45 or A45 and A30 (p > .333). Mean AI were 93.37, 114.29, and 135.07 for groups A60, A45, and A30 and the AI increased as the transection angle decreased (p < .001).

Conclusion: A 60° transection angle reduced lumen size at the anastomosis but a 45 and 30° transection angle resulted in an increased lumen size at the anastomosis. The 45° angle did not increase the number of sutures required. The 30° angle significantly increased the number of sutures required.

Clinical significance: A 45° angle of transection does not result in increased surgical time or number of sutures placed. Further investigation is required to determine the ideal angle of transection.

空肠端到端吻合术后空肠横断角的离体比较及对管腔直径的影响。
目的:评价三种不同的空肠横断角度在端到端空肠吻合术中的应用,比较构建时间、管腔大小和缝合次数。研究设计:离体尸体研究。样本群体:8匹被安乐死的马每匹都有3个中段空肠标本。方法:将空肠段分为A30、A45和A60三组,分别在30°、45°和60°处横切。横断后行标准化手工缝制单层间断改良Lembert吻合术,记录缝合时间和缝合线个数。计算吻合指数(AI)。采用单因素方差分析进行统计分析。结果:横切空肠长度随横切角度的减小而增加(p .333)。A60、A45、A30组的平均AI分别为93.37、114.29、135.07,且AI随截角的减小而增大(p)。结论:60°截角使吻合口管腔减小,45°和30°截角使吻合口管腔增大。45°的角度并没有增加需要缝合的次数。30°角度明显增加了所需的缝合次数。临床意义:截骨角度为45°不会增加手术时间或缝线数量。需要进一步的研究来确定理想的横断角度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Veterinary Surgery
Veterinary Surgery 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
22.20%
发文量
162
审稿时长
8-16 weeks
期刊介绍: Veterinary Surgery, the official publication of the American College of Veterinary Surgeons and European College of Veterinary Surgeons, is a source of up-to-date coverage of surgical and anesthetic management of animals, addressing significant problems in veterinary surgery with relevant case histories and observations. It contains original, peer-reviewed articles that cover developments in veterinary surgery, and presents the most current review of the field, with timely articles on surgical techniques, diagnostic aims, care of infections, and advances in knowledge of metabolism as it affects the surgical patient. The journal places new developments in perspective, encompassing new concepts and peer commentary to help better understand and evaluate the surgical patient.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信