Endovascular endothelial cell biopsy - a systematic review.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Charles Piercy, John Adam, James N Harrison, Christian Heiss, Paola Campagnolo, Ben Creagh-Brown
{"title":"Endovascular endothelial cell biopsy - a systematic review.","authors":"Charles Piercy, John Adam, James N Harrison, Christian Heiss, Paola Campagnolo, Ben Creagh-Brown","doi":"10.1024/0301-1526/a001207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background:</i> Endovascular endothelial cell biopsy (ECBx) allows direct sampling of endothelial cells (ECs) and subsequent assessment of EC function in patients. Our systematic review aims to summarise the current literature describing protocols to obtain and analyse EC and obtain pooled estimates of success rate and EC numbers obtained with different techniques in different populations. <i>Materials and methods:</i> Studies were identified on Medline using the terms 'endothelial cell' AND 'biopsy' AND 'humans'. All primary research involving EC biopsy was included, while animal studies or non-primary research studies were excluded from the review. The data was integrated into a narrative review and the study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022278551). <i>Results:</i> Of all journal articles identified (n=784), 51 articles were included in this review. Most studies (n=46) used a J wire for EC sampling from blood vessels in the arm (superficial arm veins [n=30], brachial artery [n=3], radial artery [n=4]). The pooled success rate was 91±15%. The average yield was 1,058±893 cells per biopsy, with variability depending on procedural factors such as wire placement, depth and technique. No significant complications were reported. Several analytical techniques were used to evaluate the isolated ECs with the most common technique being immunofluorescence (n=36). Risk of bias assessment and statistical analysis not performed due to heterogeneity of data and variability in reporting. <i>Conclusions:</i> Endothelial cells can be obtained with a variety of techniques with a high success rate and minimal complications. This review highlights novel research opportunities provided by ECBx.</p>","PeriodicalId":23528,"journal":{"name":"Vasa-european Journal of Vascular Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"305-313"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vasa-european Journal of Vascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1024/0301-1526/a001207","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Endovascular endothelial cell biopsy (ECBx) allows direct sampling of endothelial cells (ECs) and subsequent assessment of EC function in patients. Our systematic review aims to summarise the current literature describing protocols to obtain and analyse EC and obtain pooled estimates of success rate and EC numbers obtained with different techniques in different populations. Materials and methods: Studies were identified on Medline using the terms 'endothelial cell' AND 'biopsy' AND 'humans'. All primary research involving EC biopsy was included, while animal studies or non-primary research studies were excluded from the review. The data was integrated into a narrative review and the study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022278551). Results: Of all journal articles identified (n=784), 51 articles were included in this review. Most studies (n=46) used a J wire for EC sampling from blood vessels in the arm (superficial arm veins [n=30], brachial artery [n=3], radial artery [n=4]). The pooled success rate was 91±15%. The average yield was 1,058±893 cells per biopsy, with variability depending on procedural factors such as wire placement, depth and technique. No significant complications were reported. Several analytical techniques were used to evaluate the isolated ECs with the most common technique being immunofluorescence (n=36). Risk of bias assessment and statistical analysis not performed due to heterogeneity of data and variability in reporting. Conclusions: Endothelial cells can be obtained with a variety of techniques with a high success rate and minimal complications. This review highlights novel research opportunities provided by ECBx.

血管内内皮细胞活检-系统回顾。
背景:血管内皮细胞活检(ECBx)允许对内皮细胞(ECs)进行直接取样,并随后评估患者的EC功能。我们的系统综述旨在总结当前文献描述的获得和分析EC的方案,并获得在不同人群中使用不同技术获得的成功率和EC数量的汇总估计。材料和方法:研究在Medline上使用术语“内皮细胞”、“活检”和“人”进行鉴定。所有涉及EC活检的初步研究都被纳入,而动物研究或非初步研究被排除在综述之外。数据被整合到一项叙述性综述中,该研究在PROSPERO注册(CRD42022278551)。结果:在所有被识别的期刊文章中(n=784), 51篇文章被纳入本综述。大多数研究(n=46)使用J线对手臂血管(臂浅静脉[n=30],肱动脉[n=3],桡动脉[n=4])进行EC取样。合并成功率为91±15%。每次活检的平均产量为1058±893个细胞,根据钢丝放置、深度和技术等程序因素有差异。无明显并发症报道。采用多种分析技术评估分离的ECs,最常用的技术是免疫荧光(n=36)。由于数据的异质性和报告的可变性,未进行偏倚风险评估和统计分析。结论:采用多种技术可获得内皮细胞,成功率高,并发症少。本文综述了ECBx提供的新的研究机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
61
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Vasa is the European journal of vascular medicine. It is the official organ of the German, Swiss, and Slovenian Societies of Angiology. The journal publishes original research articles, case reports and reviews on vascular biology, epidemiology, prevention, diagnosis, medical treatment and interventions for diseases of the arterial circulation, in the field of phlebology and lymphology including the microcirculation, except the cardiac circulation. Vasa combines basic science with clinical medicine making it relevant to all physicians interested in the whole vascular field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信