A prospective study to determine the safety and feasibility of opioid-free discharge after percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q4 ANDROLOGY
Translational andrology and urology Pub Date : 2025-05-30 Epub Date: 2025-05-27 DOI:10.21037/tau-2024-692
David Sobel, Philip Caffery, Evelyn James, Rebecca Ortiz, Aidan Peat, Chris Tucci, Gyan Pareek
{"title":"A prospective study to determine the safety and feasibility of opioid-free discharge after percutaneous nephrolithotomy.","authors":"David Sobel, Philip Caffery, Evelyn James, Rebecca Ortiz, Aidan Peat, Chris Tucci, Gyan Pareek","doi":"10.21037/tau-2024-692","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The American opioid epidemic continues and further efforts are needed to reduce unnecessary opioid prescriptions after urologic surgery. This is a pragmatic feasibility study to evaluate the safety and feasibility of opioid-free discharge after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) utilizing a nonopioid protocol consisting of preoperative counseling, multimodal analgesics, and detailed postoperative instructions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective feasibility study (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04597619) was conducted at a single institution. All participants underwent single tract stented PCNL. Eligible participants were enrolled prospectively before and after implementation of the nonopioid protocol. Pre-intervention arm participants received opioid prescriptions at the discretion of the provider. Participants in the intervention arm underwent the nonopioid protocol. The primary outcome investigated was discharge following PCNL without a prescription for opioid pain medication. Other outcomes included postoperative pain, symptom questionnaire scores, emergency department (ED) visits for pain, and outpatient telephone calls or requests for prescription refills.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen participants were enrolled in the pre-intervention group. Of these, 10 (71%) were discharged with opioid prescriptions and 4 (29%) were discharged without opioids. Of the 10 discharged with opioids, 2 (14%) presented to the ED for pain concerns and received a new prescription for opioids. Six participants underwent intervention and received the nonopioid protocol. All participants (100%) in the intervention group were discharged without opioids. None (0%) presented to the ED for pain concerns.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This feasibility study demonstrates that patients undergoing PCNL via a standardized nonopioid pathway can be safely discharged without opioid prescriptions without impact on outpatient resources. Four participants in the pre-intervention group were discharged without opioids based on provider discretion, suggesting that the standard of care to include an opioid prescription may be changing.</p>","PeriodicalId":23270,"journal":{"name":"Translational andrology and urology","volume":"14 5","pages":"1379-1390"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12169980/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational andrology and urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/tau-2024-692","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ANDROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The American opioid epidemic continues and further efforts are needed to reduce unnecessary opioid prescriptions after urologic surgery. This is a pragmatic feasibility study to evaluate the safety and feasibility of opioid-free discharge after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) utilizing a nonopioid protocol consisting of preoperative counseling, multimodal analgesics, and detailed postoperative instructions.

Methods: A prospective feasibility study (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04597619) was conducted at a single institution. All participants underwent single tract stented PCNL. Eligible participants were enrolled prospectively before and after implementation of the nonopioid protocol. Pre-intervention arm participants received opioid prescriptions at the discretion of the provider. Participants in the intervention arm underwent the nonopioid protocol. The primary outcome investigated was discharge following PCNL without a prescription for opioid pain medication. Other outcomes included postoperative pain, symptom questionnaire scores, emergency department (ED) visits for pain, and outpatient telephone calls or requests for prescription refills.

Results: Fourteen participants were enrolled in the pre-intervention group. Of these, 10 (71%) were discharged with opioid prescriptions and 4 (29%) were discharged without opioids. Of the 10 discharged with opioids, 2 (14%) presented to the ED for pain concerns and received a new prescription for opioids. Six participants underwent intervention and received the nonopioid protocol. All participants (100%) in the intervention group were discharged without opioids. None (0%) presented to the ED for pain concerns.

Conclusions: This feasibility study demonstrates that patients undergoing PCNL via a standardized nonopioid pathway can be safely discharged without opioid prescriptions without impact on outpatient resources. Four participants in the pre-intervention group were discharged without opioids based on provider discretion, suggesting that the standard of care to include an opioid prescription may be changing.

一项前瞻性研究确定经皮肾镜取石术后无阿片类药物排出的安全性和可行性。
背景:美国阿片类药物的流行仍在继续,需要进一步努力减少泌尿外科手术后不必要的阿片类药物处方。这是一项实用的可行性研究,旨在评估经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)后无阿片类药物出院的安全性和可行性,采用非阿片类药物方案,包括术前咨询、多模式镇痛和详细的术后指导。方法:在单一机构进行前瞻性可行性研究(Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04597619)。所有参与者均行单路支架PCNL。在实施非阿片类药物方案之前和之后前瞻性地招募符合条件的参与者。干预前组参与者接受由提供者自行决定的阿片类药物处方。干预组的参与者接受非阿片类药物治疗。研究的主要结局是PCNL后无阿片类止痛药处方的出院。其他结果包括术后疼痛、症状问卷评分、因疼痛就诊的急诊科(ED)、门诊电话或要求重新配药。结果:干预前组共入组14例。其中10例(71%)出院时使用阿片类药物,4例(29%)出院时未使用阿片类药物。在10名因阿片类药物出院的患者中,2名(14%)因疼痛问题来到急诊科,并接受了阿片类药物的新处方。六名参与者接受了干预并接受了非阿片类药物治疗方案。干预组所有参与者(100%)出院时均未使用阿片类药物。无(0%)因疼痛问题到急诊科就诊。结论:本可行性研究表明,通过标准化的非阿片类药物途径进行PCNL的患者可以在不使用阿片类药物的情况下安全出院,且不会影响门诊资源。干预前组的四名参与者根据提供者的判断,未使用阿片类药物出院,这表明包括阿片类药物处方的护理标准可能正在改变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: ranslational Andrology and Urology (Print ISSN 2223-4683; Online ISSN 2223-4691; Transl Androl Urol; TAU) is an open access, peer-reviewed, bi-monthly journal (quarterly published from Mar.2012 - Dec. 2014). The main focus of the journal is to describe new findings in the field of translational research of Andrology and Urology, provides current and practical information on basic research and clinical investigations of Andrology and Urology. Specific areas of interest include, but not limited to, molecular study, pathology, biology and technical advances related to andrology and urology. Topics cover range from evaluation, prevention, diagnosis, therapy, prognosis, rehabilitation and future challenges to urology and andrology. Contributions pertinent to urology and andrology are also included from related fields such as public health, basic sciences, education, sociology, and nursing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信