Factors affecting caregivers' HPV vaccination decisions for adolescent girls: A secondary analysis of a Chinese RCT.

IF 2.6 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PLoS ONE Pub Date : 2025-06-17 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0324260
Ying Yang, Yajiao Lu, Yifan Li, Chuanyu Qin, Yu He, Wenfeng Gong, Shenglan Tang, Dan Wu, Jing Li
{"title":"Factors affecting caregivers' HPV vaccination decisions for adolescent girls: A secondary analysis of a Chinese RCT.","authors":"Ying Yang, Yajiao Lu, Yifan Li, Chuanyu Qin, Yu He, Wenfeng Gong, Shenglan Tang, Dan Wu, Jing Li","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0324260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite the HPV vaccine's effectiveness against cervical cancer, uptake among adolescent girls in China remains low, with caregivers playing a crucial role in vaccination decisions. This study investigates factors influencing caregivers' action to vaccinate their adolescent daughters.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Pay-it-forward is a novel model that motivates participants in adopting healthy behaviors and making community contributions. In this study, it offers an individual a free shot of HPV vaccine and then asks whether they would like to donate to support another person to get the same vaccination. This study was embedded in a two-arm randomized controlled trial in China. Potential associated factors were identified based on Anderson's Health Service Utilization Behavioral Model and analyzed through univariate and multivariate binary logistic regression. Caregivers' information, knowledge, attitudes, vaccine confidence, hesitancy, and willingness to vaccinate were collected through online questionnaires. The endpoint was the receipt of the first dose HPV vaccine following an intervention or no intervention (pay-it-forward vs. standard-of-care), which was obtained from an electronic vaccination registry system.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 321 caregivers, 25.9% of their daughters received the HPV vaccine, with 34.2% in the pay-it-forward group and 17.5% in the standard-of-care group. Daughters of caregivers who were previously unaware of the HPV vaccine were three times more likely to be vaccinated (OR=3.01,95%CI:1.27-7.14). Caregivers who did not intend to delay vaccination had daughters with eight times higher vaccination uptake (OR=8.26,95%CI:4.36-15.67). Participation in the \"pay-it-forward\" intervention increased vaccination rates by more than twofold (OR=2.22,95%CI:1.19-4.15). Daughters of unemployed or retired caregivers had nearly four times higher vaccination rates compared to those whose caregivers were employed (OR=3.97,95%CI:1.81-8.72). Prior refusal of the vaccine by caregivers was associated with an 80% reduction in vaccination uptake among daughters (OR=0.23,95%CI:0.06-0.81).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The pay-it-forward intervention, caregivers' knowledge, intention to delay vaccination, occupation, and prior vaccine refusal significantly influence HPV vaccine uptake among adolescent girls in China. Tailored health education, financial support, and community involvement are essential to encourage HPV vaccination among adolescent girls in China.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"20 6","pages":"e0324260"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12173375/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0324260","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite the HPV vaccine's effectiveness against cervical cancer, uptake among adolescent girls in China remains low, with caregivers playing a crucial role in vaccination decisions. This study investigates factors influencing caregivers' action to vaccinate their adolescent daughters.

Methods: Pay-it-forward is a novel model that motivates participants in adopting healthy behaviors and making community contributions. In this study, it offers an individual a free shot of HPV vaccine and then asks whether they would like to donate to support another person to get the same vaccination. This study was embedded in a two-arm randomized controlled trial in China. Potential associated factors were identified based on Anderson's Health Service Utilization Behavioral Model and analyzed through univariate and multivariate binary logistic regression. Caregivers' information, knowledge, attitudes, vaccine confidence, hesitancy, and willingness to vaccinate were collected through online questionnaires. The endpoint was the receipt of the first dose HPV vaccine following an intervention or no intervention (pay-it-forward vs. standard-of-care), which was obtained from an electronic vaccination registry system.

Results: Among 321 caregivers, 25.9% of their daughters received the HPV vaccine, with 34.2% in the pay-it-forward group and 17.5% in the standard-of-care group. Daughters of caregivers who were previously unaware of the HPV vaccine were three times more likely to be vaccinated (OR=3.01,95%CI:1.27-7.14). Caregivers who did not intend to delay vaccination had daughters with eight times higher vaccination uptake (OR=8.26,95%CI:4.36-15.67). Participation in the "pay-it-forward" intervention increased vaccination rates by more than twofold (OR=2.22,95%CI:1.19-4.15). Daughters of unemployed or retired caregivers had nearly four times higher vaccination rates compared to those whose caregivers were employed (OR=3.97,95%CI:1.81-8.72). Prior refusal of the vaccine by caregivers was associated with an 80% reduction in vaccination uptake among daughters (OR=0.23,95%CI:0.06-0.81).

Conclusion: The pay-it-forward intervention, caregivers' knowledge, intention to delay vaccination, occupation, and prior vaccine refusal significantly influence HPV vaccine uptake among adolescent girls in China. Tailored health education, financial support, and community involvement are essential to encourage HPV vaccination among adolescent girls in China.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

影响照顾者为青春期女孩接种HPV疫苗决策的因素:一项中国随机对照试验的二次分析。
背景:尽管HPV疫苗对宫颈癌有效,但中国少女的接种率仍然很低,照顾者在疫苗接种决策中起着至关重要的作用。本研究探讨影响照顾者为其青春期女儿接种疫苗的因素。方法:“向前支付”是一种激励参与者采取健康行为并为社区做出贡献的新模式。在这项研究中,它为个人提供免费的HPV疫苗,然后询问他们是否愿意捐赠以支持另一个人接种同样的疫苗。本研究是在中国进行的一项两组随机对照试验。基于Anderson的卫生服务利用行为模型,确定潜在的相关因素,并通过单因素和多因素二元logistic回归进行分析。通过在线问卷收集护理人员的信息、知识、态度、疫苗信心、犹豫和接种意愿。终点是从电子疫苗接种登记系统获得的干预或不干预后的第一剂HPV疫苗的接收情况(提前支付与标准护理)。结果:在321名照顾者中,25.9%的女儿接种了HPV疫苗,其中34.2%的人接受了付费治疗,17.5%的人接受了标准治疗。以前不知道HPV疫苗的照顾者的女儿接种HPV疫苗的可能性是其三倍(OR=3.01,95%CI:1.27-7.14)。不打算推迟疫苗接种的照料者的女儿的疫苗接种率高出8倍(OR=8.26,95%CI:4.36-15.67)。参与“向前支付”干预措施使疫苗接种率提高了两倍以上(OR=2.22,95%CI:1.19-4.15)。失业或退休照顾者的女儿的疫苗接种率比有工作照顾者的女儿高近4倍(or =3.97,95%CI:1.81-8.72)。照顾者先前拒绝接种疫苗与女儿疫苗接种率降低80%相关(OR=0.23,95%CI:0.06-0.81)。结论:未来支付干预、照顾者的知识、延迟接种意愿、职业和既往拒绝接种对中国少女HPV疫苗接种率有显著影响。量身定制的健康教育、财政支持和社区参与对于鼓励中国少女接种HPV疫苗至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
14242
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides: * Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright * Fast publication times * Peer review by expert, practicing researchers * Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact * Community-based dialogue on articles * Worldwide media coverage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信