Implementation of Communication Skills Training at Oncology Centers in Germany: Results of a Mixed-Methods Survey.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Oncology Research and Treatment Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-17 DOI:10.1159/000545729
Christian Albus, Esther-Rosa Vens-Cappell, Corinna Bergelt, Elisabeth Jentschke, Friederike Mumm, Andrea Petermann-Meyer, Frank Vitinius, Alexander Wünsch, Christian Albus
{"title":"Implementation of Communication Skills Training at Oncology Centers in Germany: Results of a Mixed-Methods Survey.","authors":"Christian Albus, Esther-Rosa Vens-Cappell, Corinna Bergelt, Elisabeth Jentschke, Friederike Mumm, Andrea Petermann-Meyer, Frank Vitinius, Alexander Wünsch, Christian Albus","doi":"10.1159/000545729","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The concept of oncological communication skills training (CST) has already proven to be effective and has been incorporated into the relevant guidelines. The current status of CSTs in Germany is unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We approached all oncology centers in Germany certified by Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft (DKG) and investigated quantitative and qualitative aspects of CST programs in a mixed-methods approach using questionnaires and interviews.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Only a quarter (23.7%, n = 18/76) of the responding centers demonstrated a regular CST. These CSTs were partially congruent with the consensus recommendations while deviating significantly in other areas, such as duration, scope, and course content. We asked centers that do not offer CST or do not offer fully satisfactory CST (respondents n = 60) for factors that hinder successful implementation, which were identified as, e.g., scarce time and personnel resources (92%), no counterpart funding (27%), lack of appreciation (25%) and knowledge about the concept (3%), organizational obstacles (22%), and low prioritization (12%). Steps that could facilitate nationwide implementation were found, such as support for implementation through concrete instructions (27%), mandatory participation (20%), an active management level in the question of responsibility (17%), inclusion in the certification criteria for oncology centers (12%), and an integration into the Weiterbildungsordnung (WBO, specialist training guideline) (10%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although previous studies have shown that CSTs have positive effects, sufficient implementation has not yet been achieved across the board in Germany. Individual starting points have been identified; further efforts are needed to advance this goal.</p>","PeriodicalId":19543,"journal":{"name":"Oncology Research and Treatment","volume":" ","pages":"601-613"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncology Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000545729","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The concept of oncological communication skills training (CST) has already proven to be effective and has been incorporated into the relevant guidelines. The current status of CSTs in Germany is unclear.

Methods: We approached all oncology centers in Germany certified by Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft (DKG) and investigated quantitative and qualitative aspects of CST programs in a mixed-methods approach using questionnaires and interviews.

Results: Only a quarter (23.7%, n = 18/76) of the responding centers demonstrated a regular CST. These CSTs were partially congruent with the consensus recommendations while deviating significantly in other areas, such as duration, scope, and course content. We asked centers that do not offer CST or do not offer fully satisfactory CST (respondents n = 60) for factors that hinder successful implementation, which were identified as, e.g., scarce time and personnel resources (92%), no counterpart funding (27%), lack of appreciation (25%) and knowledge about the concept (3%), organizational obstacles (22%), and low prioritization (12%). Steps that could facilitate nationwide implementation were found, such as support for implementation through concrete instructions (27%), mandatory participation (20%), an active management level in the question of responsibility (17%), inclusion in the certification criteria for oncology centers (12%), and an integration into the Weiterbildungsordnung (WBO, specialist training guideline) (10%).

Conclusion: Although previous studies have shown that CSTs have positive effects, sufficient implementation has not yet been achieved across the board in Germany. Individual starting points have been identified; further efforts are needed to advance this goal.

沟通技巧培训在德国肿瘤中心的实施:一项混合方法调查的结果。
导言:肿瘤沟通技巧训练(CST)的概念已被证明是有效的,并已被纳入相关指南。cst在德国的现状尚不清楚。方法:我们接触了德国所有经德国医学协会(DKG)认证的肿瘤中心,并采用问卷调查和访谈的混合方法调查了CST项目的定量和定性方面。结果:仅有1 / 4 (23.7%,n = 18/76)的应答中心有常规CST。这些cst部分与共识建议一致,而在其他领域(如持续时间、范围和课程内容)存在显著差异。我们询问了不提供CST或不提供完全满意的CST的中心(受访者n = 60)阻碍成功实施的因素,这些因素被确定为,例如,稀缺的时间和人力资源(92%),没有对应的资金(27%),缺乏对概念的欣赏(25%)和知识(3%),组织障碍(22%)和低优先级(12%)。找到了能够促进全国实施的步骤,例如通过具体指导支持实施(27%),强制参与(20%),在责任问题上积极管理(17%),纳入肿瘤中心认证标准(12%),并纳入Weiterbildungsordnung (WBO,专家培训指南)(10%)。结论:虽然之前的研究表明CSTs具有积极的效果,但在德国尚未全面实施。个别起点已经确定;需要进一步努力推进这一目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
84
期刊介绍: With the first issue in 2014, the journal ''Onkologie'' has changed its title to ''Oncology Research and Treatment''. By this change, publisher and editor set the scene for the further development of this interdisciplinary journal. The English title makes it clear that the articles are published in English – a logical step for the journal, which is listed in all relevant international databases. For excellent manuscripts, a ''Fast Track'' was introduced: The review is carried out within 2 weeks; after acceptance the papers are published online within 14 days and immediately released as ''Editor’s Choice'' to provide the authors with maximum visibility of their results. Interesting case reports are published in the section ''Novel Insights from Clinical Practice'' which clearly highlights the scientific advances which the report presents.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信