Vincenzo F Malo, Vaughn J Armbrister, Trey-Rashad Hawkins, Stefanee Tillman, Javan K Carter, Megan A Lewis
{"title":"Investigating the Relationship Between Social Support and Health Care Barriers Among Sexually and Gender Diverse Young Adults in the United States.","authors":"Vincenzo F Malo, Vaughn J Armbrister, Trey-Rashad Hawkins, Stefanee Tillman, Javan K Carter, Megan A Lewis","doi":"10.1089/lgbt.2024.0341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Purpose:</i></b> Recognizing the necessity of supportive health care systems, we used strengths-based approaches to explore the potential protective nature of social support against health care barriers among sexually and gender diverse (SGD) young adults. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Using data spanning May 2018 to July 2022 from the National Institutes of Health's <i>All of Us</i> Research Program, we created a sample of and produced descriptive estimates for 2417 SGD young adults between 20 and 35 years of age. Using logistic regressions, we calculated adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to measure the association between two outcomes-delaying health care and reported discrimination in medical settings-and instrumental/emotional social support. We adjusted for age, gender identity, race and ethnicity, housing stability, and income. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Of our sample, 70.8% endorsed at least one reason for delaying care, and 45.0% reported discrimination in medical settings \"rarely\" or more frequently, with significant differences by gender identity, sexual orientation, race and ethnicity, housing stability, income, and education for both outcomes. More social support was associated with fewer reasons for delaying health care (instrumental: aOR = 0.78, 95% CI 0.71-0.86; emotional: aOR = 0.71, 95% CI 0.63-0.79) and fewer reports of discrimination in medical settings (instrumental: aOR = 0.72, 95% CI 0.66-0.78; emotional: aOR = 0.64, 95% CI 0.58-0.70). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Our results suggest that social support might serve as a protective factor against health care barriers for SGD young adults. More strengths-based research is needed to understand intersectionality in SGD health care.</p>","PeriodicalId":18062,"journal":{"name":"LGBT health","volume":" ","pages":"499-510"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LGBT health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/lgbt.2024.0341","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Recognizing the necessity of supportive health care systems, we used strengths-based approaches to explore the potential protective nature of social support against health care barriers among sexually and gender diverse (SGD) young adults. Methods: Using data spanning May 2018 to July 2022 from the National Institutes of Health's All of Us Research Program, we created a sample of and produced descriptive estimates for 2417 SGD young adults between 20 and 35 years of age. Using logistic regressions, we calculated adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to measure the association between two outcomes-delaying health care and reported discrimination in medical settings-and instrumental/emotional social support. We adjusted for age, gender identity, race and ethnicity, housing stability, and income. Results: Of our sample, 70.8% endorsed at least one reason for delaying care, and 45.0% reported discrimination in medical settings "rarely" or more frequently, with significant differences by gender identity, sexual orientation, race and ethnicity, housing stability, income, and education for both outcomes. More social support was associated with fewer reasons for delaying health care (instrumental: aOR = 0.78, 95% CI 0.71-0.86; emotional: aOR = 0.71, 95% CI 0.63-0.79) and fewer reports of discrimination in medical settings (instrumental: aOR = 0.72, 95% CI 0.66-0.78; emotional: aOR = 0.64, 95% CI 0.58-0.70). Conclusion: Our results suggest that social support might serve as a protective factor against health care barriers for SGD young adults. More strengths-based research is needed to understand intersectionality in SGD health care.
LGBT healthPUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
6.20%
发文量
80
期刊介绍:
LGBT Health is the premier peer-reviewed journal dedicated to promoting optimal healthcare for millions of sexual and gender minority persons worldwide by focusing specifically on health while maintaining sufficient breadth to encompass the full range of relevant biopsychosocial and health policy issues. This Journal aims to promote greater awareness of the health concerns particular to each sexual minority population, and to improve availability and delivery of culturally appropriate healthcare services. LGBT Health also encourages further research and increased funding in this critical but currently underserved domain. The Journal provides a much-needed authoritative source and international forum in all areas pertinent to LGBT health and healthcare services. Contributions from all continents are solicited including Asia and Africa which are currently underrepresented in sex research.