Public health impact and cost-effectiveness of implementing gender-neutral vaccination with a 9-valent HPV vaccine in Japan: a modeling study.

IF 3 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of Medical Economics Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-20 DOI:10.1080/13696998.2025.2520703
Cody Palmer, Taizo Matsuki, Keisuke Tobe, Xuedan You, Ya-Ting Chen
{"title":"Public health impact and cost-effectiveness of implementing gender-neutral vaccination with a 9-valent HPV vaccine in Japan: a modeling study.","authors":"Cody Palmer, Taizo Matsuki, Keisuke Tobe, Xuedan You, Ya-Ting Chen","doi":"10.1080/13696998.2025.2520703","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aimed to assess the public health impact and cost-effectiveness of gender-neutral vaccination (GNV) using a nonavalent vaccine (9vHPV) in Japan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a published, validated dynamic transmission model to estimate the cases of, deaths from, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) lost to, and costs of diseases associated with HPV genotypes included in the 9vHPV vaccine. These outcomes were modeled over a 100-year time horizon under different GNV and female-only vaccination (FOV) strategies. The primary analysis compared GNV to FOV at a female vaccination coverage rate (VCR) of 30% and male VCR of 15%. Scenario analyses assessed the effects of varying these VCRs, the age at vaccination, and the discount rate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the base case, GNV averted an additional 2,070 female and 1,773 male deaths from HPV-associated cancers compared to FOV and was cost effective, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of 4,798,537 ¥/QALY from the payer perspective (direct medical costs) and 4,248,586 ¥/QALY from the societal perspective (including costs of lost work productivity). The ICER of GNV versus FOV was higher in scenarios with higher VCRs. However, the ICER could be reduced compared to the base case by implementing vaccination at <15 years of age to reduce the number of vaccine doses required or by reducing the discount rate to assign greater value to the long-term cancer prevention benefits of HPV vaccination.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>This study may be limited by inaccuracies in the model's input data and assumptions, as well as the exclusion of some societal costs, which may have underestimated cost-effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Including boys and men in Japan's HPV vaccination strategy is predicted to provide additional public health benefits compared to FOV and to be cost effective, particularly while the female VCR remains low and if the full vaccine series is completed before age 15.</p>","PeriodicalId":16229,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Economics","volume":" ","pages":"974-985"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2025.2520703","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: This study aimed to assess the public health impact and cost-effectiveness of gender-neutral vaccination (GNV) using a nonavalent vaccine (9vHPV) in Japan.

Methods: We used a published, validated dynamic transmission model to estimate the cases of, deaths from, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) lost to, and costs of diseases associated with HPV genotypes included in the 9vHPV vaccine. These outcomes were modeled over a 100-year time horizon under different GNV and female-only vaccination (FOV) strategies. The primary analysis compared GNV to FOV at a female vaccination coverage rate (VCR) of 30% and male VCR of 15%. Scenario analyses assessed the effects of varying these VCRs, the age at vaccination, and the discount rate.

Results: In the base case, GNV averted an additional 2,070 female and 1,773 male deaths from HPV-associated cancers compared to FOV and was cost effective, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of 4,798,537 ¥/QALY from the payer perspective (direct medical costs) and 4,248,586 ¥/QALY from the societal perspective (including costs of lost work productivity). The ICER of GNV versus FOV was higher in scenarios with higher VCRs. However, the ICER could be reduced compared to the base case by implementing vaccination at <15 years of age to reduce the number of vaccine doses required or by reducing the discount rate to assign greater value to the long-term cancer prevention benefits of HPV vaccination.

Limitations: This study may be limited by inaccuracies in the model's input data and assumptions, as well as the exclusion of some societal costs, which may have underestimated cost-effectiveness.

Conclusions: Including boys and men in Japan's HPV vaccination strategy is predicted to provide additional public health benefits compared to FOV and to be cost effective, particularly while the female VCR remains low and if the full vaccine series is completed before age 15.

日本9价HPV疫苗中性接种的公共卫生影响和成本效益:一项模型研究
目的:本研究旨在评估日本使用无价疫苗(9vHPV)的性别中立疫苗接种(GNV)的公共卫生影响和成本效益。方法:我们使用一个已发表的、经过验证的动态传播模型来估计9vHPV疫苗中包含的HPV基因型相关疾病的病例、死亡、质量调整生命年(QALYs)损失和成本。这些结果在不同的GNV和仅限女性接种(FOV)策略下进行了100年时间范围的建模。初步分析比较了女性疫苗接种率(VCR)为30%和男性疫苗接种率(VCR)为15%时的GNV和FOV。情景分析评估了不同vcr、接种年龄和贴现率的影响。结果:在基本情况下,与FOV相比,GNV避免了额外的2,070名女性和1,773名男性死于hpv相关癌症,并且具有成本效益,从付款人的角度(直接医疗费用)来看,增量成本效益比(ICER)为4,798,537日元/QALY,从社会角度来看(包括丧失工作效率的成本),增量成本效益比(ICER)为4,248,586日元/QALY。在vcr较高的情况下,GNV与FOV的ICER较高。然而,与基本情况相比,ICER可以通过在局限性下实施疫苗接种来降低:该研究可能受到模型输入数据和假设的不准确性以及排除一些可能低估成本效益的社会成本的限制。结论:将男孩和男性纳入日本的HPV疫苗接种战略预计将提供额外的公共卫生效益,与FOV相比具有成本效益,特别是在女性VCR仍然很低并且在15岁之前完成全部疫苗系列的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Economics
Journal of Medical Economics HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
122
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Economics'' mission is to provide ethical, unbiased and rapid publication of quality content that is validated by rigorous peer review. The aim of Journal of Medical Economics is to serve the information needs of the pharmacoeconomics and healthcare research community, to help translate research advances into patient care and be a leader in transparency/disclosure by facilitating a collaborative and honest approach to publication. Journal of Medical Economics publishes high-quality economic assessments of novel therapeutic and device interventions for an international audience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信