Budget impact analysis of cenobamate, a novel adjunctive therapy for the treatment of drug resistant focal onset seizures, from the Belgian healthcare payer perspective.

IF 3 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of Medical Economics Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-27 DOI:10.1080/13696998.2025.2520182
Kristl Vonck, Olivier Bodart, Sarah Weckhuysen, Ann Tanghe, Britt Callebaut, Caroline Verdonck, Lynn Van den Bergh, Benjamin Legros
{"title":"Budget impact analysis of cenobamate, a novel adjunctive therapy for the treatment of drug resistant focal onset seizures, from the Belgian healthcare payer perspective.","authors":"Kristl Vonck, Olivier Bodart, Sarah Weckhuysen, Ann Tanghe, Britt Callebaut, Caroline Verdonck, Lynn Van den Bergh, Benjamin Legros","doi":"10.1080/13696998.2025.2520182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Cenobamate has recently been introduced as new anti-seizure medication (ASM) for patients with focal onset seizures (FOS) who are insufficiently controlled despite the use of three previous ASMs. To date, few evaluations have addressed the budgetary impact for the healthcare payer of add-on ASMs in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). This study aims to assess the budgetary implications for the Belgian health insurer, the National Institute for Health and Disability Insurance (NIHDI), if cenobamate were reimbursed for the adjuvant treatment of FOS in adults with DRE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prevalence-based budget impact model (BIM) was developed from the perspective of the Belgian NIHDI, considering all direct healthcare costs over a 3-year time horizon. A standardized expert elicitation process with experienced epileptologists was conducted to collect data on Belgian clinical practice. Source data uncertainty impact was investigated through a one-way sensitivity analysis (OWSA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over a 3-year period, considering the cumulative drug costs of cenobamate, replacement of other third-generation ASMs, and savings generated at medical cost level, the introduction of cenobamate as adjunctive treatment for the target population was estimated to reduce the NIHDI budget by -€8,105,616. The robustness of these savings was confirmed through an OWSA.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The savings at medical cost level fully offset the impact of cenobamate on the drug budget, leading to an overall healthcare budget saving of -€8,105,616 for NIHDI. This favourable outcome is largely due to cenobamate's high efficacy reflected in its high response rate and significant effect on reducing seizure frequency.</p>","PeriodicalId":16229,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Economics","volume":" ","pages":"990-1001"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2025.2520182","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Cenobamate has recently been introduced as new anti-seizure medication (ASM) for patients with focal onset seizures (FOS) who are insufficiently controlled despite the use of three previous ASMs. To date, few evaluations have addressed the budgetary impact for the healthcare payer of add-on ASMs in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). This study aims to assess the budgetary implications for the Belgian health insurer, the National Institute for Health and Disability Insurance (NIHDI), if cenobamate were reimbursed for the adjuvant treatment of FOS in adults with DRE.

Methods: A prevalence-based budget impact model (BIM) was developed from the perspective of the Belgian NIHDI, considering all direct healthcare costs over a 3-year time horizon. A standardized expert elicitation process with experienced epileptologists was conducted to collect data on Belgian clinical practice. Source data uncertainty impact was investigated through a one-way sensitivity analysis (OWSA).

Results: Over a 3-year period, considering the cumulative drug costs of cenobamate, replacement of other third-generation ASMs, and savings generated at medical cost level, the introduction of cenobamate as adjunctive treatment for the target population was estimated to reduce the NIHDI budget by -€8,105,616. The robustness of these savings was confirmed through an OWSA.

Conclusion: The savings at medical cost level fully offset the impact of cenobamate on the drug budget, leading to an overall healthcare budget saving of -€8,105,616 for NIHDI. This favourable outcome is largely due to cenobamate's high efficacy reflected in its high response rate and significant effect on reducing seizure frequency.

从比利时医疗保健支付者的角度,对治疗耐药局灶性癫痫的新型辅助疗法cenobamate的预算影响分析。
目的:Cenobamate最近被引入作为一种新的抗癫痫药物(ASM),用于局灶性发作(FOS)患者,尽管使用了三次ASM,但仍不能充分控制。迄今为止,很少有评估涉及到对耐药癫痫(DRE)患者附加asm的医疗保健支付者的预算影响。本研究旨在评估比利时健康保险公司,国家健康和残疾保险研究所(NIHDI)的预算影响,如果对患有DRE的成人的FOS辅助治疗进行报销。方法:从比利时NIHDI的角度开发了基于患病率的预算影响模型(BIM),考虑了三年时间范围内的所有直接医疗保健成本。一个标准化的专家引出过程与经验丰富的癫痫学家进行了收集数据的比利时临床实践。通过单向敏感性分析(OWSA)调查源数据不确定性影响。结果:在三年的时间里,考虑到cenobamate的累积药物成本,替代其他第三代asm,以及在医疗成本水平上产生的节省,引入cenobamate作为目标人群的辅助治疗,估计可减少NIHDI预算- 8105616欧元。通过OWSA确认了这些节省的稳健性。结论:医疗费用水平的节省完全抵消了药物预算的影响,导致NIHDI整体医疗预算节省- 8 105 616欧元。这一良好的结果主要是由于cenobamate的高疗效,反映在其高反应率和显著的减少癫痫发作频率的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Economics
Journal of Medical Economics HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
122
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Economics'' mission is to provide ethical, unbiased and rapid publication of quality content that is validated by rigorous peer review. The aim of Journal of Medical Economics is to serve the information needs of the pharmacoeconomics and healthcare research community, to help translate research advances into patient care and be a leader in transparency/disclosure by facilitating a collaborative and honest approach to publication. Journal of Medical Economics publishes high-quality economic assessments of novel therapeutic and device interventions for an international audience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信