Is cone length a risk factor for internal margin positivity in high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions based on age?

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Lu Zhang, Shuang Shang, Peiqing Quan, Long Sui, Qing Cong
{"title":"Is cone length a risk factor for internal margin positivity in high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions based on age?","authors":"Lu Zhang, Shuang Shang, Peiqing Quan, Long Sui, Qing Cong","doi":"10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.101825","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the association between cone length and internal margin positivity in high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) patients, stratified by age, and provide personalized treatment recommendations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis of 1188 HSIL patients treated with Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure at the Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University in 2021. The study evaluated human papillomavirus genotyping, cytology, colposcopy findings, and characteristics of cone excision. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors associated with internal margin positivity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall rate of positive internal margins was 11%. Age (OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.05, p = .021), high-risk cytology (OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.12 to 2.52, p = .012), human papillomavirus 16 infection (OR 1.78, 95% CI 1.18 to 2.66, p = .006), and endocervical HSIL lesion (OR 5.05, 95% CI 3.15 to 8.08, p < .001) were independent risk factors for internal margin positivity. Notably, among women >50, a negative correlation between cone length and positive internal margins was observed. A cone length exceeding 20 mm reduced the positive internal margin rate to 7%. In cases of cervical atrophy, excising at least 50% of the pre-operative cervical length significantly reduced the positive internal margin rate to 12.5%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The length of the excision cone is a significant risk factor for positive internal margin, particularly among women >50. This highlights the importance of age-specific, optimized cervical excision lengths and supports personalized treatment strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":14097,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","volume":"35 7","pages":"101825"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.101825","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To determine the association between cone length and internal margin positivity in high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) patients, stratified by age, and provide personalized treatment recommendations.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 1188 HSIL patients treated with Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure at the Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University in 2021. The study evaluated human papillomavirus genotyping, cytology, colposcopy findings, and characteristics of cone excision. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors associated with internal margin positivity.

Results: The overall rate of positive internal margins was 11%. Age (OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.05, p = .021), high-risk cytology (OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.12 to 2.52, p = .012), human papillomavirus 16 infection (OR 1.78, 95% CI 1.18 to 2.66, p = .006), and endocervical HSIL lesion (OR 5.05, 95% CI 3.15 to 8.08, p < .001) were independent risk factors for internal margin positivity. Notably, among women >50, a negative correlation between cone length and positive internal margins was observed. A cone length exceeding 20 mm reduced the positive internal margin rate to 7%. In cases of cervical atrophy, excising at least 50% of the pre-operative cervical length significantly reduced the positive internal margin rate to 12.5%.

Conclusions: The length of the excision cone is a significant risk factor for positive internal margin, particularly among women >50. This highlights the importance of age-specific, optimized cervical excision lengths and supports personalized treatment strategies.

视锥长度是基于年龄的高级别鳞状上皮内病变内切缘阳性的危险因素吗?
目的:确定高级别鳞状上皮内病变(HSIL)患者视锥长度与内切缘阳性之间的关系,并按年龄分层,提供个性化治疗建议。方法:回顾性分析复旦大学妇产科医院2021年行环形电切术治疗的1188例HSIL患者。该研究评估了人乳头瘤病毒基因分型、细胞学、阴道镜检查结果和锥体切除的特征。进行逻辑回归分析以确定与内部边际阳性相关的独立危险因素。结果:内切缘阳性率为11%。年龄(OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.00 ~ 1.05, p = 0.021)、高危细胞学(OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.12 ~ 2.52, p = 0.012)、人乳头瘤病毒16感染(OR 1.78, 95% CI 1.18 ~ 2.66, p = 0.006)和宫颈内HSIL病变(OR 5.05, 95% CI 3.15 ~ 8.08, p < 0.001)是内切缘阳性的独立危险因素。值得注意的是,在50岁的女性中,观察到锥体长度与正内缘之间的负相关。锥体长度超过20mm时,正内缘率降至7%。在宫颈萎缩的病例中,切除至少50%的术前宫颈长度可显著降低阳性内切率至12.5%。结论:切除锥的长度是内切缘阳性的重要危险因素,尤其是在50岁的女性中。这突出了针对特定年龄、优化宫颈切除长度的重要性,并支持个性化的治疗策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
10.40%
发文量
280
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, the official journal of the International Gynecologic Cancer Society and the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology, is the primary educational and informational publication for topics relevant to detection, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of gynecologic malignancies. IJGC emphasizes a multidisciplinary approach, and includes original research, reviews, and video articles. The audience consists of gynecologists, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, radiologists, pathologists, and research scientists with a special interest in gynecological oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信