Implementation of a routine respiratory follow-up after prematurity less than 32 weeks gestation or below 1,500 g birthweight at preschool age-a two-year experience.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Frontiers in Pediatrics Pub Date : 2025-06-02 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fped.2025.1604037
Michaela Höck, Anna Zschocke, Ulrike Pupp-Peglow, Carolin Marcher, Barbara Brunner, Maria Schütz, Ursula Kiechl-Kohlendorfer, Elke Griesmaier
{"title":"Implementation of a routine respiratory follow-up after prematurity less than 32 weeks gestation or below 1,500 g birthweight at preschool age-a two-year experience.","authors":"Michaela Höck, Anna Zschocke, Ulrike Pupp-Peglow, Carolin Marcher, Barbara Brunner, Maria Schütz, Ursula Kiechl-Kohlendorfer, Elke Griesmaier","doi":"10.3389/fped.2025.1604037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Growing evidence indicates that prematurity adversely affects lung function, even in early childhood, thus, a routine respiratory follow-up was implemented in our clinical setting. The aim of this study was to evaluate the acceptance of this examination and assess the feasibility of forced expiratory maneuvers and bronchodilator responsiveness test (BRT) in former preterm infants at preschool age and to present initial results.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In November 2022, a respiratory follow-up was implemented for former preterm infants born at less than 32 weeks of gestation or with a birth weight below 1,500 g, who were born between 2016 and 2019 at Innsbruck Medical University Hospital. The evaluation included a standardized clinical examination, collection of medical history, spirometry, and a BRT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 107 former preterm infants (median gestational age 29.9 (28.1; 31.1) weeks and mean birthweight 1,250.5 (±355.6) grams performed spirometry. Successful spirometry was achieved by 93 (86.9%) children. Among these, 64 (59.8%) had normal pulmonary function and were symptom-free, however, ten (15.6%) showed a positive BRT. Twenty-nine children (27.1%) exhibited pathological test results and/or respiratory symptoms, with 13 (44.8%) of them testing positive for bronchial hyper-responsiveness. Fourteen children (13.1%) did not meet the quality control criteria for spirometry but were symptom-free.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study demonstrated that a respiratory follow-up for preterm infants is highly accepted and feasible at preschool age. Up to 30% of infants were identified with impaired lung function and subsequently received appropriate management, highlighting the importance of standardized and routine respiratory follow-up for these children.</p>","PeriodicalId":12637,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Pediatrics","volume":"13 ","pages":"1604037"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12171263/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2025.1604037","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Growing evidence indicates that prematurity adversely affects lung function, even in early childhood, thus, a routine respiratory follow-up was implemented in our clinical setting. The aim of this study was to evaluate the acceptance of this examination and assess the feasibility of forced expiratory maneuvers and bronchodilator responsiveness test (BRT) in former preterm infants at preschool age and to present initial results.

Methods: In November 2022, a respiratory follow-up was implemented for former preterm infants born at less than 32 weeks of gestation or with a birth weight below 1,500 g, who were born between 2016 and 2019 at Innsbruck Medical University Hospital. The evaluation included a standardized clinical examination, collection of medical history, spirometry, and a BRT.

Results: A total of 107 former preterm infants (median gestational age 29.9 (28.1; 31.1) weeks and mean birthweight 1,250.5 (±355.6) grams performed spirometry. Successful spirometry was achieved by 93 (86.9%) children. Among these, 64 (59.8%) had normal pulmonary function and were symptom-free, however, ten (15.6%) showed a positive BRT. Twenty-nine children (27.1%) exhibited pathological test results and/or respiratory symptoms, with 13 (44.8%) of them testing positive for bronchial hyper-responsiveness. Fourteen children (13.1%) did not meet the quality control criteria for spirometry but were symptom-free.

Conclusion: Our study demonstrated that a respiratory follow-up for preterm infants is highly accepted and feasible at preschool age. Up to 30% of infants were identified with impaired lung function and subsequently received appropriate management, highlighting the importance of standardized and routine respiratory follow-up for these children.

对妊娠少于32周或学龄前出生体重低于1500克的早产儿进行常规呼吸随访,为期两年。
背景:越来越多的证据表明,早产对肺功能有不利影响,甚至在儿童早期,因此,在我们的临床环境中实施了常规呼吸随访。本研究的目的是评估这种检查的接受程度,评估强制呼气操作和支气管扩张剂反应性试验(BRT)在学龄前早产儿中的可行性,并给出初步结果。方法:于2022年11月,对2016年至2019年在因斯布鲁克医科大学医院出生的妊娠小于32周或出生体重低于1500 g的前早产儿进行呼吸随访。评估包括标准化临床检查、病史收集、肺活量测定和BRT。结果:共107例前早产儿(中位胎龄29.9 (28.1;31.1)周,平均出生体重1,250.5(±355.6)克进行肺活量测定。93例(86.9%)患儿肺活量测定成功。其中64例(59.8%)肺功能正常,无症状,10例(15.6%)BRT阳性。29例(27.1%)患儿表现出病理检查结果和/或呼吸道症状,其中13例(44.8%)患儿支气管高反应性阳性。14例患儿(13.1%)不符合肺量测定质量控制标准,但无症状。结论:我们的研究表明,在学龄前对早产儿进行呼吸随访是高度可接受和可行的。高达30%的婴儿被确定为肺功能受损,并随后接受了适当的治疗,这突出了对这些儿童进行标准化和常规呼吸随访的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Pediatrics
Frontiers in Pediatrics Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
2132
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Pediatrics (Impact Factor 2.33) publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research broadly across the field, from basic to clinical research that meets ongoing challenges in pediatric patient care and child health. Field Chief Editors Arjan Te Pas at Leiden University and Michael L. Moritz at the Children''s Hospital of Pittsburgh are supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international experts. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. Frontiers in Pediatrics also features Research Topics, Frontiers special theme-focused issues managed by Guest Associate Editors, addressing important areas in pediatrics. In this fashion, Frontiers serves as an outlet to publish the broadest aspects of pediatrics in both basic and clinical research, including high-quality reviews, case reports, editorials and commentaries related to all aspects of pediatrics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信