Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, biological agents and small molecules: where do we stand?

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Expert Review of Clinical Immunology Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-19 DOI:10.1080/1744666X.2025.2522266
Carlo Lombardi, Francesco Menzella
{"title":"Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, biological agents and small molecules: where do we stand?","authors":"Carlo Lombardi, Francesco Menzella","doi":"10.1080/1744666X.2025.2522266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is characterized by persistent respiratory symptoms and airflow limitation. A subset of patients exhibits eosinophilic inflammation, which has been shown to impact disease severity and exacerbation frequency.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This review aims to provide an update on the role of eosinophils in COPD and the efficacy of biologics targeting inflammation. Furthermore, we will explore eosinophilia as a biomarker for COPD outcomes. The findings highlight the potential of biologics in managing COPD. We conducted a review of the English-language literature from the beginning of the databases reviewed through April 2025.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>In COPD there is a close interplay between inflammation, lung damage and multimorbidities, mechanisms that determine a lower efficacy of biologics. Patients currently eligible for biologics are only the subpopulation with eosinophilic airway inflammation, but biologics that target broad-acting epithelial cytokines might have a greater efficacy in a complex disease such as COPD. This is because their mechanism of action is not limited to modulation of eosinophilic inflammation alone but to multiple driver pathways. Looking forward, there is an urgent need to identify new biomarkers for better patient selection to improve the impact of biologics, which is still not yet fully satisfactory.</p>","PeriodicalId":12175,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Clinical Immunology","volume":" ","pages":"909-919"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Clinical Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1744666X.2025.2522266","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is characterized by persistent respiratory symptoms and airflow limitation. A subset of patients exhibits eosinophilic inflammation, which has been shown to impact disease severity and exacerbation frequency.

Areas covered: This review aims to provide an update on the role of eosinophils in COPD and the efficacy of biologics targeting inflammation. Furthermore, we will explore eosinophilia as a biomarker for COPD outcomes. The findings highlight the potential of biologics in managing COPD. We conducted a review of the English-language literature from the beginning of the databases reviewed through April 2025.

Expert opinion: In COPD there is a close interplay between inflammation, lung damage and multimorbidities, mechanisms that determine a lower efficacy of biologics. Patients currently eligible for biologics are only the subpopulation with eosinophilic airway inflammation, but biologics that target broad-acting epithelial cytokines might have a greater efficacy in a complex disease such as COPD. This is because their mechanism of action is not limited to modulation of eosinophilic inflammation alone but to multiple driver pathways. Looking forward, there is an urgent need to identify new biomarkers for better patient selection to improve the impact of biologics, which is still not yet fully satisfactory.

慢性阻塞性肺疾病,生物制剂和小分子:我们站在哪里?
慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的特征是持续的呼吸道症状和气流限制。一部分患者表现出嗜酸性粒细胞炎症,这已被证明会影响疾病的严重程度和恶化频率。涵盖领域:本综述旨在提供嗜酸性粒细胞在COPD中的作用和靶向炎症的生物制剂的功效的最新进展。此外,我们将探索嗜酸性粒细胞作为COPD预后的生物标志物。这一发现强调了生物制剂在慢性阻塞性肺病治疗中的潜力。我们对从数据库开始到2025年4月的英语文献进行了回顾。专家意见:在慢性阻塞性肺病中,炎症、肺损伤和多种疾病之间存在密切的相互作用,这些机制决定了生物制剂的疗效较低。目前有资格使用生物制剂的患者仅为嗜酸性气道炎症亚群,但针对广谱上皮细胞因子的生物制剂可能对慢性阻塞性肺病等复杂疾病有更大的疗效。这是因为它们的作用机制不仅限于调节嗜酸性粒细胞炎症,而且涉及多种驱动途径。展望未来,迫切需要确定新的生物标志物,以便更好地选择患者,以提高生物制剂的影响,这一点尚未完全令人满意。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
2.30%
发文量
221
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Clinical Immunology (ISSN 1744-666X) provides expert analysis and commentary regarding the performance of new therapeutic and diagnostic modalities in clinical immunology. Members of the International Editorial Advisory Panel of Expert Review of Clinical Immunology are the forefront of their area of expertise. This panel works with our dedicated editorial team to identify the most important and topical review themes and the corresponding expert(s) most appropriate to provide commentary and analysis. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review, and the finished reviews provide an essential contribution to decision-making in clinical immunology. Articles focus on the following key areas: • Therapeutic overviews of specific immunologic disorders highlighting optimal therapy and prospects for new medicines • Performance and benefits of newly approved therapeutic agents • New diagnostic approaches • Screening and patient stratification • Pharmacoeconomic studies • New therapeutic indications for existing therapies • Adverse effects, occurrence and reduction • Prospects for medicines in late-stage trials approaching regulatory approval • Novel treatment strategies • Epidemiological studies • Commentary and comparison of treatment guidelines Topics include infection and immunity, inflammation, host defense mechanisms, congenital and acquired immunodeficiencies, anaphylaxis and allergy, systemic immune diseases, organ-specific inflammatory diseases, transplantation immunology, endocrinology and diabetes, cancer immunology, neuroimmunology and hematological diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信