Impact of the clinical role of interventional radiologists: results of the CLINTERVENTIONAL randomized controlled trial.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Pedro Blas García Jurado, Juan José Espejo Herrero, María Sagrario Lombardo Galera, María Eugenia Pérez Montilla, Sara Barranco Acosta, José García-Revillo García, Pilar Font Ugalde, Marina Álvarez Benito
{"title":"Impact of the clinical role of interventional radiologists: results of the CLINTERVENTIONAL randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Pedro Blas García Jurado, Juan José Espejo Herrero, María Sagrario Lombardo Galera, María Eugenia Pérez Montilla, Sara Barranco Acosta, José García-Revillo García, Pilar Font Ugalde, Marina Álvarez Benito","doi":"10.1007/s00330-025-11757-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the impact of preprocedural consultations with interventional radiologists and explanatory videos of interventional radiology (IR) procedures on patients' knowledge, satisfaction with information and communication, and anxiety regarding the procedure.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A randomized, controlled, single-center trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05461482) was conducted between August 2022 and April 2024. Patients scheduled for certain IR procedures were included. They were randomly assigned to a control group (standard information from the ordering physician) or experimental group (additional consultation with an interventional radiologist and access to explanatory videos about the procedures). Knowledge of the procedures (measured via multiple-choice questionnaires), satisfaction with the information and communication (Likert scales), and anxiety (Likert scale and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory) were assessed. Statistical analyses included Student's t-test, the chi-square test, and mixed analysis of variance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four hundred thirty patients (mean age, 62 years (13); 267 men) were included. The experimental group (n = 214), compared to the control group (n = 216), showed greater understanding of the procedures (10.5 (1.9) vs 5.1 (3.2); p < 0.001) and greater satisfaction with the information (8.9 (1.5) vs 6.5 (3.3); p < 0.001) and communication (8.7 (1.7) vs 6.4 (2.8); p < 0.001). Anxiety was lower in the experimental group according to the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (42.9 (12.7) vs 45.7 (12.4); p = 0.02). 99.5% (207/208) of patients in the experimental group felt the video helped them understand the intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Preprocedural consultations by interventional radiologists improve patients' understanding of the procedure, increase their satisfaction with information and communication, and reduce anxiety during the procedure.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Question Technical advances in IR lack parallel clinical role development, possibly limiting preprocedural information. This study evaluates preprocedural consultations and videos to address this gap. Findings Preprocedural consultations with interventional radiologists and explanatory videos enhance patient knowledge, improve satisfaction with information and communication, and reduce procedure-related anxiety. Clinical relevance Structured preprocedural communication, including consultations with radiologists and explanatory videos, optimizes patients' understanding, satisfaction with information and communication, and emotional well-being, reinforcing the importance of patient-centered care in IR.</p>","PeriodicalId":12076,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-025-11757-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the impact of preprocedural consultations with interventional radiologists and explanatory videos of interventional radiology (IR) procedures on patients' knowledge, satisfaction with information and communication, and anxiety regarding the procedure.

Materials and methods: A randomized, controlled, single-center trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05461482) was conducted between August 2022 and April 2024. Patients scheduled for certain IR procedures were included. They were randomly assigned to a control group (standard information from the ordering physician) or experimental group (additional consultation with an interventional radiologist and access to explanatory videos about the procedures). Knowledge of the procedures (measured via multiple-choice questionnaires), satisfaction with the information and communication (Likert scales), and anxiety (Likert scale and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory) were assessed. Statistical analyses included Student's t-test, the chi-square test, and mixed analysis of variance.

Results: Four hundred thirty patients (mean age, 62 years (13); 267 men) were included. The experimental group (n = 214), compared to the control group (n = 216), showed greater understanding of the procedures (10.5 (1.9) vs 5.1 (3.2); p < 0.001) and greater satisfaction with the information (8.9 (1.5) vs 6.5 (3.3); p < 0.001) and communication (8.7 (1.7) vs 6.4 (2.8); p < 0.001). Anxiety was lower in the experimental group according to the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (42.9 (12.7) vs 45.7 (12.4); p = 0.02). 99.5% (207/208) of patients in the experimental group felt the video helped them understand the intervention.

Conclusions: Preprocedural consultations by interventional radiologists improve patients' understanding of the procedure, increase their satisfaction with information and communication, and reduce anxiety during the procedure.

Key points: Question Technical advances in IR lack parallel clinical role development, possibly limiting preprocedural information. This study evaluates preprocedural consultations and videos to address this gap. Findings Preprocedural consultations with interventional radiologists and explanatory videos enhance patient knowledge, improve satisfaction with information and communication, and reduce procedure-related anxiety. Clinical relevance Structured preprocedural communication, including consultations with radiologists and explanatory videos, optimizes patients' understanding, satisfaction with information and communication, and emotional well-being, reinforcing the importance of patient-centered care in IR.

介入放射科医师临床角色的影响:CLINTERVENTIONAL随机对照试验的结果。
目的:评估介入放射科医师术前会诊及介入放射科手术解说视频对患者手术知识、信息沟通满意度及手术焦虑的影响。材料和方法:一项随机、对照、单中心试验(ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05461482)于2022年8月至2024年4月进行。计划进行某些IR手术的患者也包括在内。他们被随机分配到对照组(从处方医生那里获得标准信息)或实验组(与介入放射科医生进行额外咨询,并观看有关手术过程的解释性视频)。对程序知识(通过多项选择问卷测量),对信息和沟通的满意度(李克特量表)和焦虑(李克特量表和状态-特质焦虑量表)进行评估。统计分析包括学生t检验、卡方检验和混合方差分析。结果:430例,平均年龄62岁(13岁);包括267名男性)。实验组(n = 214)与对照组(n = 216)相比,对手术程序的理解程度更高(10.5 (1.9)vs 5.1 (3.2);p结论:介入放射科医师的术前咨询提高了患者对手术的了解,提高了患者对信息和沟通的满意度,减少了患者在手术过程中的焦虑。IR的技术进步缺乏平行的临床角色发展,可能限制了术前信息。本研究评估了程序前咨询和视频,以解决这一差距。结果术前与介入放射科医师的会诊和说明性视频提高了患者的知识水平,提高了患者对信息和沟通的满意度,减少了手术相关焦虑。结构化的术前沟通,包括与放射科医生的咨询和解释性视频,优化了患者的理解,对信息和沟通的满意度,以及情绪健康,加强了以患者为中心的护理在IR中的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Radiology
European Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
8.50%
发文量
874
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: European Radiology (ER) continuously updates scientific knowledge in radiology by publication of strong original articles and state-of-the-art reviews written by leading radiologists. A well balanced combination of review articles, original papers, short communications from European radiological congresses and information on society matters makes ER an indispensable source for current information in this field. This is the Journal of the European Society of Radiology, and the official journal of a number of societies. From 2004-2008 supplements to European Radiology were published under its companion, European Radiology Supplements, ISSN 1613-3749.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信