Subin Heo, Jihye Yun, Dong Wook Kim, Seo Young Park, Sang Hyun Choi, Kyuwon Kim, Kee Wook Jung, Seung-Jae Myung, Seong Ho Park
{"title":"Effects of patient and imaging factors on small bowel motility scores derived from deep learning-based segmentation of cine MRI.","authors":"Subin Heo, Jihye Yun, Dong Wook Kim, Seo Young Park, Sang Hyun Choi, Kyuwon Kim, Kee Wook Jung, Seung-Jae Myung, Seong Ho Park","doi":"10.1007/s00330-025-11737-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Small bowel motility can be quantified using cine MRI, but the influence of patient and imaging factors on motility scores remains unclear. This study evaluated whether patient and imaging factors affect motility scores derived from deep learning-based segmentation of cine MRI.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Fifty-four patients (mean age 53.6 ± 16.4 years; 34 women) with chronic constipation or suspected colonic pseudo-obstruction who underwent cine MRI covering the entire small bowel between 2022 and 2023 were included. A deep learning algorithm was developed to segment small bowel regions, and motility was quantified with an optical flow-based algorithm, producing a motility score for each slice. Associations of motility scores with patient factors (age, sex, body mass index, symptoms, and bowel distension) and MRI slice-related factors (anatomical location, bowel area, and anteroposterior position) were analyzed using linear mixed models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Deep learning-based small bowel segmentation achieved a mean volumetric Dice similarity coefficient of 75.4 ± 18.9%, with a manual correction time of 26.5 ± 13.5 s. Median motility scores per patient ranged from 26.4 to 64.4, with an interquartile range of 3.1-26.6. Multivariable analysis revealed that MRI slice-related factors, including anatomical location with mixed ileum and jejunum (β = -4.9; p = 0.01, compared with ileum dominant), bowel area (first order β = -0.2, p < 0.001; second order β = 5.7 × 10<sup>-4</sup>, p < 0.001), and anteroposterior position (first order β = -51.5, p < 0.001; second order β = 28.8, p = 0.004) were significantly associated with motility scores. Patient factors showed no association with motility scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Small bowel motility scores were significantly associated with MRI slice-related factors. Determining global motility without adjusting for these factors may be limited.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Question Global small bowel motility can be quantified from cine MRI; however, the confounding factors affecting motility scores remain unclear. Findings Motility scores were significantly influenced by MRI slice-related factors, including anatomical location, bowel area, and anteroposterior position. Clinical relevance Adjusting for slice-related factors is essential for accurate interpretation of small bowel motility scores on cine MRI.</p>","PeriodicalId":12076,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-025-11737-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Small bowel motility can be quantified using cine MRI, but the influence of patient and imaging factors on motility scores remains unclear. This study evaluated whether patient and imaging factors affect motility scores derived from deep learning-based segmentation of cine MRI.
Materials and methods: Fifty-four patients (mean age 53.6 ± 16.4 years; 34 women) with chronic constipation or suspected colonic pseudo-obstruction who underwent cine MRI covering the entire small bowel between 2022 and 2023 were included. A deep learning algorithm was developed to segment small bowel regions, and motility was quantified with an optical flow-based algorithm, producing a motility score for each slice. Associations of motility scores with patient factors (age, sex, body mass index, symptoms, and bowel distension) and MRI slice-related factors (anatomical location, bowel area, and anteroposterior position) were analyzed using linear mixed models.
Results: Deep learning-based small bowel segmentation achieved a mean volumetric Dice similarity coefficient of 75.4 ± 18.9%, with a manual correction time of 26.5 ± 13.5 s. Median motility scores per patient ranged from 26.4 to 64.4, with an interquartile range of 3.1-26.6. Multivariable analysis revealed that MRI slice-related factors, including anatomical location with mixed ileum and jejunum (β = -4.9; p = 0.01, compared with ileum dominant), bowel area (first order β = -0.2, p < 0.001; second order β = 5.7 × 10-4, p < 0.001), and anteroposterior position (first order β = -51.5, p < 0.001; second order β = 28.8, p = 0.004) were significantly associated with motility scores. Patient factors showed no association with motility scores.
Conclusion: Small bowel motility scores were significantly associated with MRI slice-related factors. Determining global motility without adjusting for these factors may be limited.
Key points: Question Global small bowel motility can be quantified from cine MRI; however, the confounding factors affecting motility scores remain unclear. Findings Motility scores were significantly influenced by MRI slice-related factors, including anatomical location, bowel area, and anteroposterior position. Clinical relevance Adjusting for slice-related factors is essential for accurate interpretation of small bowel motility scores on cine MRI.
期刊介绍:
European Radiology (ER) continuously updates scientific knowledge in radiology by publication of strong original articles and state-of-the-art reviews written by leading radiologists. A well balanced combination of review articles, original papers, short communications from European radiological congresses and information on society matters makes ER an indispensable source for current information in this field.
This is the Journal of the European Society of Radiology, and the official journal of a number of societies.
From 2004-2008 supplements to European Radiology were published under its companion, European Radiology Supplements, ISSN 1613-3749.