Aishwarya Dande, H M Chandra Mouli, Joshita Nandy, Shambhavi Shreya, Nikhil Pallaprolu, Gananadhamu Samanthula, Ramalingam P
{"title":"Risk Assessment, Detection and Control of Mutagenic Impurities in Pharmaceuticals: Emphasis on Nitrosamines.","authors":"Aishwarya Dande, H M Chandra Mouli, Joshita Nandy, Shambhavi Shreya, Nikhil Pallaprolu, Gananadhamu Samanthula, Ramalingam P","doi":"10.1080/10408347.2025.2517357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The emergence of mutagenic impurities, particularly nitrosamines and nitrosamine drug substance-related impurities (NDSRIs), has raised critical concerns across the pharmaceutical industry due to their established genotoxic and carcinogenic potential. Despite the existing regulatory frameworks, drug recalls by the USFDA continued to expose persistent gaps in the prediction, detection, and control of these impurities. The chemical origins, formation mechanisms, and risk factors associated with nitrosamines and NDSRIs remain complex, and current mitigation strategies often fail to address their variability and context-specific formation. From an analytical standpoint, quantifying these impurities at sub-ppb levels remains challenging due to matrix interference and instrumental limitations. Techniques such as LC-HRMS and GC-MS/MS provide the required sensitivity and selectivity but require rigorous compound-specific method validation. A paradigm shift toward mechanistically informed, compound-specific risk management is also essential. Structure-based computational tools such as SAR, QSAR, and QSTR and <i>in silico</i> tools such as TOPKAT, DOPMAT, and quantum mechanics offer preliminary hazard identification but demonstrate limited reliability when applied to chemically diverse or novel impurities. <i>In vitro</i> genotoxicity assays, although widely used, frequently fail to predict <i>in vivo</i> outcomes, particularly for complex nitrosamines, highlighting the indispensable role of <i>in vivo</i> studies in accurately characterizing mutagenic and carcinogenic potential, especially in borderline cases. Chemical insights into impurity formation, high-resolution analytical techniques, and integrating <i>in vivo</i> toxicological data provide, a comprehensive framework to enhance impurity control, ensure regulatory compliance, and safeguard long-term pharmaceutical safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":10744,"journal":{"name":"Critical reviews in analytical chemistry","volume":" ","pages":"1-42"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical reviews in analytical chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10408347.2025.2517357","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The emergence of mutagenic impurities, particularly nitrosamines and nitrosamine drug substance-related impurities (NDSRIs), has raised critical concerns across the pharmaceutical industry due to their established genotoxic and carcinogenic potential. Despite the existing regulatory frameworks, drug recalls by the USFDA continued to expose persistent gaps in the prediction, detection, and control of these impurities. The chemical origins, formation mechanisms, and risk factors associated with nitrosamines and NDSRIs remain complex, and current mitigation strategies often fail to address their variability and context-specific formation. From an analytical standpoint, quantifying these impurities at sub-ppb levels remains challenging due to matrix interference and instrumental limitations. Techniques such as LC-HRMS and GC-MS/MS provide the required sensitivity and selectivity but require rigorous compound-specific method validation. A paradigm shift toward mechanistically informed, compound-specific risk management is also essential. Structure-based computational tools such as SAR, QSAR, and QSTR and in silico tools such as TOPKAT, DOPMAT, and quantum mechanics offer preliminary hazard identification but demonstrate limited reliability when applied to chemically diverse or novel impurities. In vitro genotoxicity assays, although widely used, frequently fail to predict in vivo outcomes, particularly for complex nitrosamines, highlighting the indispensable role of in vivo studies in accurately characterizing mutagenic and carcinogenic potential, especially in borderline cases. Chemical insights into impurity formation, high-resolution analytical techniques, and integrating in vivo toxicological data provide, a comprehensive framework to enhance impurity control, ensure regulatory compliance, and safeguard long-term pharmaceutical safety.
期刊介绍:
Critical Reviews in Analytical Chemistry continues to be a dependable resource for both the expert and the student by providing in-depth, scholarly, insightful reviews of important topics within the discipline of analytical chemistry and related measurement sciences. The journal exclusively publishes review articles that illuminate the underlying science, that evaluate the field''s status by putting recent developments into proper perspective and context, and that speculate on possible future developments. A limited number of articles are of a "tutorial" format written by experts for scientists seeking introduction or clarification in a new area.
This journal serves as a forum for linking various underlying components in broad and interdisciplinary means, while maintaining balance between applied and fundamental research. Topics we are interested in receiving reviews on are the following:
· chemical analysis;
· instrumentation;
· chemometrics;
· analytical biochemistry;
· medicinal analysis;
· forensics;
· environmental sciences;
· applied physics;
· and material science.