Risk Assessment, Detection and Control of Mutagenic Impurities in Pharmaceuticals: Emphasis on Nitrosamines.

IF 5.2 2区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Aishwarya Dande, H M Chandra Mouli, Joshita Nandy, Shambhavi Shreya, Nikhil Pallaprolu, Gananadhamu Samanthula, Ramalingam P
{"title":"Risk Assessment, Detection and Control of Mutagenic Impurities in Pharmaceuticals: Emphasis on Nitrosamines.","authors":"Aishwarya Dande, H M Chandra Mouli, Joshita Nandy, Shambhavi Shreya, Nikhil Pallaprolu, Gananadhamu Samanthula, Ramalingam P","doi":"10.1080/10408347.2025.2517357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The emergence of mutagenic impurities, particularly nitrosamines and nitrosamine drug substance-related impurities (NDSRIs), has raised critical concerns across the pharmaceutical industry due to their established genotoxic and carcinogenic potential. Despite the existing regulatory frameworks, drug recalls by the USFDA continued to expose persistent gaps in the prediction, detection, and control of these impurities. The chemical origins, formation mechanisms, and risk factors associated with nitrosamines and NDSRIs remain complex, and current mitigation strategies often fail to address their variability and context-specific formation. From an analytical standpoint, quantifying these impurities at sub-ppb levels remains challenging due to matrix interference and instrumental limitations. Techniques such as LC-HRMS and GC-MS/MS provide the required sensitivity and selectivity but require rigorous compound-specific method validation. A paradigm shift toward mechanistically informed, compound-specific risk management is also essential. Structure-based computational tools such as SAR, QSAR, and QSTR and <i>in silico</i> tools such as TOPKAT, DOPMAT, and quantum mechanics offer preliminary hazard identification but demonstrate limited reliability when applied to chemically diverse or novel impurities. <i>In vitro</i> genotoxicity assays, although widely used, frequently fail to predict <i>in vivo</i> outcomes, particularly for complex nitrosamines, highlighting the indispensable role of <i>in vivo</i> studies in accurately characterizing mutagenic and carcinogenic potential, especially in borderline cases. Chemical insights into impurity formation, high-resolution analytical techniques, and integrating <i>in vivo</i> toxicological data provide, a comprehensive framework to enhance impurity control, ensure regulatory compliance, and safeguard long-term pharmaceutical safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":10744,"journal":{"name":"Critical reviews in analytical chemistry","volume":" ","pages":"1-42"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical reviews in analytical chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10408347.2025.2517357","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The emergence of mutagenic impurities, particularly nitrosamines and nitrosamine drug substance-related impurities (NDSRIs), has raised critical concerns across the pharmaceutical industry due to their established genotoxic and carcinogenic potential. Despite the existing regulatory frameworks, drug recalls by the USFDA continued to expose persistent gaps in the prediction, detection, and control of these impurities. The chemical origins, formation mechanisms, and risk factors associated with nitrosamines and NDSRIs remain complex, and current mitigation strategies often fail to address their variability and context-specific formation. From an analytical standpoint, quantifying these impurities at sub-ppb levels remains challenging due to matrix interference and instrumental limitations. Techniques such as LC-HRMS and GC-MS/MS provide the required sensitivity and selectivity but require rigorous compound-specific method validation. A paradigm shift toward mechanistically informed, compound-specific risk management is also essential. Structure-based computational tools such as SAR, QSAR, and QSTR and in silico tools such as TOPKAT, DOPMAT, and quantum mechanics offer preliminary hazard identification but demonstrate limited reliability when applied to chemically diverse or novel impurities. In vitro genotoxicity assays, although widely used, frequently fail to predict in vivo outcomes, particularly for complex nitrosamines, highlighting the indispensable role of in vivo studies in accurately characterizing mutagenic and carcinogenic potential, especially in borderline cases. Chemical insights into impurity formation, high-resolution analytical techniques, and integrating in vivo toxicological data provide, a comprehensive framework to enhance impurity control, ensure regulatory compliance, and safeguard long-term pharmaceutical safety.

药品中致突变杂质的风险评估、检测与控制:以亚硝胺类为重点。
致突变杂质的出现,特别是亚硝胺和亚硝胺原料药相关杂质(NDSRIs),由于其已确定的遗传毒性和致癌潜力,引起了整个制药行业的严重关注。尽管有现有的监管框架,USFDA的药品召回仍然暴露出在预测、检测和控制这些杂质方面的持续差距。与亚硝胺和NDSRIs相关的化学来源、形成机制和风险因素仍然很复杂,目前的缓解战略往往无法解决它们的可变性和具体环境形成问题。从分析的角度来看,由于基质干扰和仪器限制,在亚ppb水平上量化这些杂质仍然具有挑战性。LC-HRMS和GC-MS/MS等技术提供所需的灵敏度和选择性,但需要严格的化合物特异性方法验证。向机械信息、特定化合物风险管理的范式转变也是必不可少的。基于结构的计算工具,如SAR、QSAR和QSTR,以及计算机工具,如TOPKAT、DOPMAT和量子力学,提供了初步的危险识别,但在应用于化学多样性或新杂质时,可靠性有限。体外遗传毒性测定虽然被广泛使用,但往往不能预测体内结果,特别是对于复杂的亚硝胺,这突出了体内研究在准确表征致突变和致癌潜力方面不可或缺的作用,特别是在临界病例中。杂质形成的化学见解、高分辨率分析技术和整合体内毒理学数据提供了一个全面的框架,以加强杂质控制,确保法规遵从性,并保障长期的药物安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
4.00%
发文量
137
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Critical Reviews in Analytical Chemistry continues to be a dependable resource for both the expert and the student by providing in-depth, scholarly, insightful reviews of important topics within the discipline of analytical chemistry and related measurement sciences. The journal exclusively publishes review articles that illuminate the underlying science, that evaluate the field''s status by putting recent developments into proper perspective and context, and that speculate on possible future developments. A limited number of articles are of a "tutorial" format written by experts for scientists seeking introduction or clarification in a new area. This journal serves as a forum for linking various underlying components in broad and interdisciplinary means, while maintaining balance between applied and fundamental research. Topics we are interested in receiving reviews on are the following: · chemical analysis; · instrumentation; · chemometrics; · analytical biochemistry; · medicinal analysis; · forensics; · environmental sciences; · applied physics; · and material science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信