Application value of the FOCUS-PDCA cycle in nursing care for dysphagia in patients with cerebral infarction: a meta-analysis.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-17 DOI:10.1055/s-0045-1809417
Xiaojing Lu, Jiandong Zhang, Ranran Wang, Xiujuan Liu
{"title":"Application value of the FOCUS-PDCA cycle in nursing care for dysphagia in patients with cerebral infarction: a meta-analysis.","authors":"Xiaojing Lu, Jiandong Zhang, Ranran Wang, Xiujuan Liu","doi":"10.1055/s-0045-1809417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In recent years, there has been growing interest in applying quality improvement methodologies to healthcare processes. One such approach is the Find, Organize, Clarify, Understand, Select-Plan, Do, Check, and Act (FOCUS-PDCA) cycle.To evaluate the effectiveness of the FOCUS-PDCA cycle in the management of dysphagia in patients with cerebral infarction.We conducted a comprehensive literature search on the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang databases for articles published up to October 31st, 2024, following the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Randomized controlled trials and high-quality retrospective studies comparing the FOCUS-PDCA cycle with conventional care were included. The primary outcomes were swallowing function, quality of life, neurological and limb functions, and complication rates. Data were pooled using random-effects models, and heterogeneity was assessed using the <i>I2</i> statistic.We included 6 studies involving 638 patients. The FOCUS-PDCA group showed significant improvements in swallowing function (standardized mean difference [SMD] = 1.65; 95%CI: 0.08-3.21), quality of life (SMD = 2.16; 95%CI: 0.54-3.79), and neurological and limb functions (SMD = 1.03; 95%CI: 0.07-2.00) compared with the conventional care group. The FOCUS-PDCA approach significantly reduced complication rates (risk ratio = 0.48; 95%CI: 0.32-0.68).The FOCUS-PDCA cycle appears to be an effective strategy to improve outcomes in patients with cerebral infarction and dysphagia. However, more high-quality studies are needed to confirm these findings and guide clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":8694,"journal":{"name":"Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria","volume":"83 6","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0045-1809417","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, there has been growing interest in applying quality improvement methodologies to healthcare processes. One such approach is the Find, Organize, Clarify, Understand, Select-Plan, Do, Check, and Act (FOCUS-PDCA) cycle.To evaluate the effectiveness of the FOCUS-PDCA cycle in the management of dysphagia in patients with cerebral infarction.We conducted a comprehensive literature search on the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang databases for articles published up to October 31st, 2024, following the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Randomized controlled trials and high-quality retrospective studies comparing the FOCUS-PDCA cycle with conventional care were included. The primary outcomes were swallowing function, quality of life, neurological and limb functions, and complication rates. Data were pooled using random-effects models, and heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic.We included 6 studies involving 638 patients. The FOCUS-PDCA group showed significant improvements in swallowing function (standardized mean difference [SMD] = 1.65; 95%CI: 0.08-3.21), quality of life (SMD = 2.16; 95%CI: 0.54-3.79), and neurological and limb functions (SMD = 1.03; 95%CI: 0.07-2.00) compared with the conventional care group. The FOCUS-PDCA approach significantly reduced complication rates (risk ratio = 0.48; 95%CI: 0.32-0.68).The FOCUS-PDCA cycle appears to be an effective strategy to improve outcomes in patients with cerebral infarction and dysphagia. However, more high-quality studies are needed to confirm these findings and guide clinical practice.

FOCUS-PDCA循环在脑梗死患者吞咽困难护理中的应用价值:meta分析。
近年来,人们对将质量改进方法应用于医疗保健流程越来越感兴趣。其中一种方法是发现、组织、澄清、理解、选择-计划、执行、检查和行动(FOCUS-PDCA)循环。目的:评价FOCUS-PDCA循环治疗脑梗死患者吞咽困难的疗效。我们在PubMed、Embase、Cochrane图书馆、Web of Science、中国国家知识基础设施和万方数据库进行了全面的文献检索,检索截止到2024年10月31日发表的文章,并遵循PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and meta - analysis)声明的指导方针。随机对照试验和高质量回顾性研究比较了FOCUS-PDCA循环与传统护理。主要结局是吞咽功能、生活质量、神经和肢体功能以及并发症发生率。采用随机效应模型合并数据,采用I2统计量评估异质性。我们纳入了6项研究,涉及638名患者。FOCUS-PDCA组吞咽功能明显改善(标准化均差[SMD] = 1.65;95%CI: 0.08-3.21),生活质量(SMD = 2.16;95%CI: 0.54-3.79),神经和肢体功能(SMD = 1.03;95%CI: 0.07-2.00)。FOCUS-PDCA入路显著降低并发症发生率(风险比= 0.48;95%置信区间:0.32—-0.68)。FOCUS-PDCA循环似乎是改善脑梗死和吞咽困难患者预后的有效策略。然而,需要更多高质量的研究来证实这些发现并指导临床实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria
Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
7.10%
发文量
262
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria is the official journal of the Brazilian Academy of Neurology. The mission of the journal is to provide neurologists, specialists and researchers in Neurology and related fields with open access to original articles (clinical and translational research), editorials, reviews, historical papers, neuroimages and letters about published manuscripts. It also publishes the consensus and guidelines on Neurology, as well as educational and scientific material from the different scientific departments of the Brazilian Academy of Neurology. The ultimate goals of the journal are to contribute to advance knowledge in the areas of Neurology and Neuroscience, and to provide valuable material for training and continuing education for neurologists and other health professionals working in the area. These goals might contribute to improving care for patients with neurological diseases. We aim to be the best Neuroscience journal in Latin America within the peer review system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信