Theatre etiquette Delphi: the development of a guide on professional conduct and best practices in operating environments.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
M El Boghdady, J Hardie, P A Brennan
{"title":"Theatre etiquette Delphi: the development of a guide on professional conduct and best practices in operating environments.","authors":"M El Boghdady, J Hardie, P A Brennan","doi":"10.1308/rcsann.2025.0040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The importance of non-technical skills (NTS) to surgical performance and patient safety has been increasingly recognised by surgical teams. Inductions for new surgical team members in theatre often provide insufficient, non-standard and 'ad hoc' training in theatre behaviour and etiquette. We conducted a Delphi consensus study among senior surgeons to develop standardised guidance on theatre etiquette for those unfamiliar with the theatre environment, including resident surgical trainees and medical students.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An international Delphi process of two rounds was conducted. An electronic survey was distributed among senior surgeons, anaesthetists and senior scrub nurses/practitioners, with participants recruited via surgical societies. Participants were asked to rank each statement on a Likert scale of 1 to 5. Consensus was considered if achieved for any statement for which 75% or more indicated agreement. The study was registered with the Open Science Framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 261 participants completed the Delphi process; 239 valid responses were included in round 1, with a 23% dropout in round 2. Participants were from 23 countries, 66% were from the UK, 58.2% were male, 51% were from the 30 to 40-year age group, 39% were consultant surgeons and 49% were senior trainees. General surgeons made up 68.6% of respondents, trauma and orthopaedic surgeons 13.4%, healthcare practitioners 2.1% and anaesthetists 1.3%. Thirteen statements were excluded, and 29 reached agreement and were included in the final guidance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was agreement among a large international group of surgeons to develop a standardised guidance for theatre etiquette, addressing most of the key aspects of professional conduct and team dynamics. We anticipate that this guidance will serve as a valuable resource for orienting new members of the surgical team, providing a clear framework for maintaining professionalism and fostering effective communication within the theatre environment.</p>","PeriodicalId":8088,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2025.0040","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The importance of non-technical skills (NTS) to surgical performance and patient safety has been increasingly recognised by surgical teams. Inductions for new surgical team members in theatre often provide insufficient, non-standard and 'ad hoc' training in theatre behaviour and etiquette. We conducted a Delphi consensus study among senior surgeons to develop standardised guidance on theatre etiquette for those unfamiliar with the theatre environment, including resident surgical trainees and medical students.

Methods: An international Delphi process of two rounds was conducted. An electronic survey was distributed among senior surgeons, anaesthetists and senior scrub nurses/practitioners, with participants recruited via surgical societies. Participants were asked to rank each statement on a Likert scale of 1 to 5. Consensus was considered if achieved for any statement for which 75% or more indicated agreement. The study was registered with the Open Science Framework.

Results: A total of 261 participants completed the Delphi process; 239 valid responses were included in round 1, with a 23% dropout in round 2. Participants were from 23 countries, 66% were from the UK, 58.2% were male, 51% were from the 30 to 40-year age group, 39% were consultant surgeons and 49% were senior trainees. General surgeons made up 68.6% of respondents, trauma and orthopaedic surgeons 13.4%, healthcare practitioners 2.1% and anaesthetists 1.3%. Thirteen statements were excluded, and 29 reached agreement and were included in the final guidance.

Conclusion: There was agreement among a large international group of surgeons to develop a standardised guidance for theatre etiquette, addressing most of the key aspects of professional conduct and team dynamics. We anticipate that this guidance will serve as a valuable resource for orienting new members of the surgical team, providing a clear framework for maintaining professionalism and fostering effective communication within the theatre environment.

戏剧礼仪德尔福:在操作环境中制定专业行为和最佳实践指南。
导言:非技术技能(NTS)对手术性能和患者安全的重要性已经越来越多地被外科团队认识到。手术室外科团队新成员的入职培训通常在手术室行为和礼仪方面提供不充分、非标准和“临时”培训。我们在资深外科医生中进行了一项德尔菲共识研究,旨在为不熟悉手术室环境的人(包括住院外科实习生和医学生)制定标准化的手术室礼仪指导。方法:采用两轮国际德尔菲法。通过外科学会招募的资深外科医生、麻醉师和资深护理/从业人员进行了电子调查。参与者被要求按照1到5的李克特量表对每个陈述进行排名。如果达到75%或以上表示同意的任何陈述均被视为达成共识。该研究已在开放科学框架注册。结果:共有261名参与者完成了德尔菲过程;第1轮纳入239个有效应答,第2轮有23%的受试者退出。参与者来自23个国家,66%来自英国,58.2%为男性,51%为30至40岁年龄组,39%为外科顾问医生,49%为高级培训生。普通外科医生占68.6%,创伤和矫形外科医生占13.4%,保健医生占2.1%,麻醉师占1.3%。13项声明被排除在外,29项达成一致,并列入最终指导意见。结论:一大批国际外科医生达成共识,制定一套标准化的手术室礼仪指南,解决专业行为和团队动力的大多数关键方面。我们期望这份指南将成为指导外科团队新成员的宝贵资源,为保持专业精神和促进手术室环境中的有效沟通提供清晰的框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
316
期刊介绍: The Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England is the official scholarly research journal of the Royal College of Surgeons and is published eight times a year in January, February, March, April, May, July, September and November. The main aim of the journal is to publish high-quality, peer-reviewed papers that relate to all branches of surgery. The Annals also includes letters and comments, a regular technical section, controversial topics, CORESS feedback and book reviews. The editorial board is composed of experts from all the surgical specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信