No evidence of a detrimental effect of pitavastatin on neurocognitive function among people with HIV.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY
AIDS Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-11 DOI:10.1097/QAD.0000000000004267
Kristine M Erlandson, Ashley McKhann, Douglas W Kitch, Frank J Palella, Ronald J Ellis, Beau M Ances, Markella V Zanni, Marissa R Diggs, Sarah M Chu, Judith S Currier, Gerald S Bloomfield, Carlos D Malvestutto, Carl J Fichtenbaum, Judith A Aberg, Susan L Koletar, Rachel M Presti, Timothy J Hatlen, Daniel J Skiest, Pamela S Douglas, Heather J Ribaudo, Steven K Grinspoon
{"title":"No evidence of a detrimental effect of pitavastatin on neurocognitive function among people with HIV.","authors":"Kristine M Erlandson, Ashley McKhann, Douglas W Kitch, Frank J Palella, Ronald J Ellis, Beau M Ances, Markella V Zanni, Marissa R Diggs, Sarah M Chu, Judith S Currier, Gerald S Bloomfield, Carlos D Malvestutto, Carl J Fichtenbaum, Judith A Aberg, Susan L Koletar, Rachel M Presti, Timothy J Hatlen, Daniel J Skiest, Pamela S Douglas, Heather J Ribaudo, Steven K Grinspoon","doi":"10.1097/QAD.0000000000004267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Effects of statins on neurocognitive function remain poorly understood, with some studies suggesting harm and others suggesting benefit. Limited observational data among people with HIV (PWH) is biased by indication for statin prescription. We sought to assess statin effects on neurocognitive function among PWH.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We leveraged data from participants co-enrolled in REPRIEVE (randomized trial of pitavastatin vs. placebo among PWH with low-to-moderate cardiovascular risk) and HAILO (observational study involving repeated neurocognitive measures).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants with at least one measure of neurocognitive function before and after REPRIEVE randomization were included. Neurocognitive function was determined by NPZ-4, the average of the Z scores from Hopkins Verbal Learning Test Revised, Trailmaking A and B, and Digit Symbol Test every 48 weeks. Trajectories before and after randomization were analyzed with generalized estimating equation models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 181 co-enrolled participants (pitavastatin 88, placebo 93), changes over median 2.3 years on overall and individual neurocognitive scores were small, not meeting a clinically relevant threshold of more than 0.5/year, and similar between arms. Although subgroup analyses were limited by a small sample size, we observed trends toward improved Trailmaking A in participants with baseline impairment who were randomized to pitavastatin vs. placebo and towards worsened NPZ-4 in women randomized to pitavastatin vs. placebo that similarly did not reach threshold for clinical relevance. Other subgroup effects were minimal and not statistically or clinically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found no evidence of a detrimental effect of pitavastatin use on a limited battery of neurocognitive assessments among PWH, even among PWH with baseline neurocognitive impairment.</p>","PeriodicalId":7502,"journal":{"name":"AIDS","volume":" ","pages":"1913-1919"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12250025/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AIDS","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/QAD.0000000000004267","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Effects of statins on neurocognitive function remain poorly understood, with some studies suggesting harm and others suggesting benefit. Limited observational data among people with HIV (PWH) is biased by indication for statin prescription. We sought to assess statin effects on neurocognitive function among PWH.

Design: We leveraged data from participants co-enrolled in REPRIEVE (randomized trial of pitavastatin vs. placebo among PWH with low-to-moderate cardiovascular risk) and HAILO (observational study involving repeated neurocognitive measures).

Methods: Participants with at least one measure of neurocognitive function before and after REPRIEVE randomization were included. Neurocognitive function was determined by NPZ-4, the average of the Z scores from Hopkins Verbal Learning Test Revised, Trailmaking A and B, and Digit Symbol Test every 48 weeks. Trajectories before and after randomization were analyzed with generalized estimating equation models.

Results: Of 181 co-enrolled participants (pitavastatin 88, placebo 93), changes over median 2.3 years on overall and individual neurocognitive scores were small, not meeting a clinically relevant threshold of more than 0.5/year, and similar between arms. Although subgroup analyses were limited by a small sample size, we observed trends toward improved Trailmaking A in participants with baseline impairment who were randomized to pitavastatin vs. placebo and towards worsened NPZ-4 in women randomized to pitavastatin vs. placebo that similarly did not reach threshold for clinical relevance. Other subgroup effects were minimal and not statistically or clinically significant.

Conclusion: We found no evidence of a detrimental effect of pitavastatin use on a limited battery of neurocognitive assessments among PWH, even among PWH with baseline neurocognitive impairment.

没有证据表明匹伐他汀对艾滋病毒感染者的神经认知功能有不利影响。
目的:他汀类药物对神经认知功能的影响仍然知之甚少,一些研究表明有害,另一些研究表明有益。艾滋病毒感染者(PWH)的有限观察数据因他汀类药物的适应症而有偏倚。我们试图评估他汀类药物对PWH患者神经认知功能的影响。设计:我们利用了来自reeve(匹伐他汀与安慰剂在低至中度心血管风险PWH患者中的随机试验)和HAILO(涉及重复神经认知测量的观察性研究)参与者的数据。方法:纳入在reeve随机化前后神经认知功能≥1项的受试者。神经认知功能采用NPZ-4,即每48周进行一次的霍普金斯语言学习测验修正、划线A、B和数字符号测验Z分数的平均值。采用广义估计方程模型对随机化前后的轨迹进行分析。结果:在181名联合入组的参与者中(匹伐他汀88人,安慰剂93人),在中位2.3年中,总体和个体神经认知评分的变化很小,未达到临床相关阈值>.5 /年,两组之间相似。虽然亚组分析受到小样本量的限制,但我们观察到,在随机分配给匹伐他汀和安慰剂的基线损伤参与者中,Trailmaking a有改善的趋势,而在随机分配给匹伐他汀和安慰剂的女性中,NPZ-4有恶化的趋势,同样没有达到临床相关性的阈值。其他亚组效应很小,没有统计学或临床意义。结论:我们没有发现使用匹伐他汀对PWH有限的神经认知评估有不利影响的证据,即使在基线神经认知障碍的PWH中也是如此。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AIDS
AIDS 医学-病毒学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
5.30%
发文量
478
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Publishing the very latest ground breaking research on HIV and AIDS. Read by all the top clinicians and researchers, AIDS has the highest impact of all AIDS-related journals. With 18 issues per year, AIDS guarantees the authoritative presentation of significant advances. The Editors, themselves noted international experts who know the demands of your work, are committed to making AIDS the most distinguished and innovative journal in the field. Submitted articles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信