A tale of two U.S. Global health security futures—withdraw or evolve?

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Nahid Bhadelia , Craig Spencer , Elizabeth Cameron
{"title":"A tale of two U.S. Global health security futures—withdraw or evolve?","authors":"Nahid Bhadelia ,&nbsp;Craig Spencer ,&nbsp;Elizabeth Cameron","doi":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2025.127399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Rapid detection and response to biological threats are critical to global health security. For decades, the United States has played a leading role in international outbreak response. However, recent U.S. policy shifts, including deep cuts to global health programs, reductions in personnel, and withdrawal from key institutions like the World Health Organization, are weakening disease detection and response systems worldwide. These actions threaten outbreak preparedness, data sharing, research collaboration, and frontline response capabilities, increasing the risk of uncontrolled epidemics with potentially catastrophic consequences.</div><div>Diminished U.S. engagement in global health security has created a critical void, weakening disease surveillance, biosecurity, biosafety, outbreak control, and the development and distribution of medical countermeasures. The erosion of American leadership undermines global capacity to detect and respond to emerging threats, increasing the risk of epidemics and pandemics. Rather than retreating, the United States must sustain and strengthen its global health programs, integrating efforts to enhance efficiency and effectiveness, to safeguard both international stability and American pandemic preparedness.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23491,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine","volume":"61 ","pages":"Article 127399"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vaccine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X25006966","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rapid detection and response to biological threats are critical to global health security. For decades, the United States has played a leading role in international outbreak response. However, recent U.S. policy shifts, including deep cuts to global health programs, reductions in personnel, and withdrawal from key institutions like the World Health Organization, are weakening disease detection and response systems worldwide. These actions threaten outbreak preparedness, data sharing, research collaboration, and frontline response capabilities, increasing the risk of uncontrolled epidemics with potentially catastrophic consequences.
Diminished U.S. engagement in global health security has created a critical void, weakening disease surveillance, biosecurity, biosafety, outbreak control, and the development and distribution of medical countermeasures. The erosion of American leadership undermines global capacity to detect and respond to emerging threats, increasing the risk of epidemics and pandemics. Rather than retreating, the United States must sustain and strengthen its global health programs, integrating efforts to enhance efficiency and effectiveness, to safeguard both international stability and American pandemic preparedness.
美国全球卫生安全的两个未来——退出还是发展?
快速发现和应对生物威胁对全球卫生安全至关重要。几十年来,美国在应对国际疫情方面发挥了主导作用。然而,美国最近的政策转变,包括对全球卫生项目的大幅削减,人员的减少,以及从世界卫生组织等关键机构的退出,正在削弱世界范围内的疾病检测和反应系统。这些行动威胁到疫情防范、数据共享、研究合作和一线应对能力,增加了疫情失控的风险,可能造成灾难性后果。美国对全球卫生安全参与的减少造成了一个严重的空白,削弱了疾病监测、生物安全、生物安全、疫情控制以及医疗对策的制定和分发。美国领导地位的削弱削弱了全球发现和应对新出现的威胁的能力,增加了流行病和流行病的风险。美国不应该退缩,而是必须维持和加强其全球卫生项目,整合各项努力以提高效率和效果,以维护国际稳定和美国对流行病的防范。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Vaccine
Vaccine 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
5.50%
发文量
992
审稿时长
131 days
期刊介绍: Vaccine is unique in publishing the highest quality science across all disciplines relevant to the field of vaccinology - all original article submissions across basic and clinical research, vaccine manufacturing, history, public policy, behavioral science and ethics, social sciences, safety, and many other related areas are welcomed. The submission categories as given in the Guide for Authors indicate where we receive the most papers. Papers outside these major areas are also welcome and authors are encouraged to contact us with specific questions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信