Stationary charging, electric road charging or battery swapping? A multi-day truck trip cost model

IF 4.4 2区工程技术 Q2 BUSINESS

Research in Transportation Business and Management Pub Date : 2025-06-18 DOI:10.1016/j.rtbm.2025.101431

Maria Börjesson , Emil Numminen , Henrik Sällberg

{"title":"Stationary charging, electric road charging or battery swapping? A multi-day truck trip cost model","authors":"Maria Börjesson , Emil Numminen , Henrik Sällberg","doi":"10.1016/j.rtbm.2025.101431","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study developed a multi-day electric truck trip cost model to analyse cost-minimising carrier use of stationary charging, battery swapping and catenary electric roads in the EU TEN-T road network setting. Each of these three charging options has its own advantages for carriers, thus motivating the analysis. The multi-day truck segment accounts for almost one-fifth of all truck tonne kilometres within the EU, making it important to consider in the quest to decarbonise this sector. Nevertheless, this segment has until now been sparsely analysed in the literature on truck electrification. Based on the scenario analysis, the carrier truck trip costs in the current state (year 2024) and future state (year 2035) was analysed. The current state analysis revealed that catenary electric roads are a cost-minimising option to carriers, whereas future state analysis revealed that catenary electric roads and swapping can perform on par while being cost-advantageous vis-à-vis stationary charging. The sensitivity of these findings to battery parameters, electric road user charges, swapping fee levels and charging alliances was reported. The implications of the findings for carriers, vehicle producers and policymakers were discussed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47453,"journal":{"name":"Research in Transportation Business and Management","volume":"62 ","pages":"Article 101431"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Transportation Business and Management","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210539525001464","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study developed a multi-day electric truck trip cost model to analyse cost-minimising carrier use of stationary charging, battery swapping and catenary electric roads in the EU TEN-T road network setting. Each of these three charging options has its own advantages for carriers, thus motivating the analysis. The multi-day truck segment accounts for almost one-fifth of all truck tonne kilometres within the EU, making it important to consider in the quest to decarbonise this sector. Nevertheless, this segment has until now been sparsely analysed in the literature on truck electrification. Based on the scenario analysis, the carrier truck trip costs in the current state (year 2024) and future state (year 2035) was analysed. The current state analysis revealed that catenary electric roads are a cost-minimising option to carriers, whereas future state analysis revealed that catenary electric roads and swapping can perform on par while being cost-advantageous vis-à-vis stationary charging. The sensitivity of these findings to battery parameters, electric road user charges, swapping fee levels and charging alliances was reported. The implications of the findings for carriers, vehicle producers and policymakers were discussed.

查看原文本刊更多论文

固定充电、道路充电还是换电池？多日卡车行程成本模型

本研究开发了一个多日电动卡车行程成本模型，以分析在欧盟TEN-T道路网络设置下固定充电、电池更换和接触网电动道路的成本最小化载体使用。对于运营商来说，这三种收费方式都有各自的优势，这也促使了我们的分析。多日卡车部分占欧盟所有卡车吨公里的近五分之一，因此在寻求该部门脱碳的过程中，考虑这一点很重要。尽管如此，这部分到目前为止，在卡车电气化的文献中进行了稀疏的分析。在情景分析的基础上，分析了当前状态（2024年）和未来状态（2035年）的运输车出行成本。目前的状态分析表明，接触网电动道路是运营商成本最小化的选择，而未来的状态分析表明，接触网电动道路和交换可以在与-à-vis固定充电相比具有成本优势的情况下发挥同等作用。报告了这些发现对电池参数、电动道路使用者收费、交换费用水平和充电联盟的敏感性。研究结果对运营商、汽车生产商和政策制定者的影响进行了讨论。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Research in Transportation Business and Management Multiple-

CiteScore

7.10

自引率

8.30%

发文量

175

期刊介绍： Research in Transportation Business & Management (RTBM) will publish research on international aspects of transport management such as business strategy, communication, sustainability, finance, human resource management, law, logistics, marketing, franchising, privatisation and commercialisation. Research in Transportation Business & Management welcomes proposals for themed volumes from scholars in management, in relation to all modes of transport. Issues should be cross-disciplinary for one mode or single-disciplinary for all modes. We are keen to receive proposals that combine and integrate theories and concepts that are taken from or can be traced to origins in different disciplines or lessons learned from different modes and approaches to the topic. By facilitating the development of interdisciplinary or intermodal concepts, theories and ideas, and by synthesizing these for the journal''s audience, we seek to contribute to both scholarly advancement of knowledge and the state of managerial practice. Potential volume themes include: -Sustainability and Transportation Management- Transport Management and the Reduction of Transport''s Carbon Footprint- Marketing Transport/Branding Transportation- Benchmarking, Performance Measurement and Best Practices in Transport Operations- Franchising, Concessions and Alternate Governance Mechanisms for Transport Organisations- Logistics and the Integration of Transportation into Freight Supply Chains- Risk Management (or Asset Management or Transportation Finance or ...): Lessons from Multiple Modes- Engaging the Stakeholder in Transportation Governance- Reliability in the Freight Sector