Addressing actual and community expectations on CO2 concentrations within indoor spaces – A reasonably practicable methodology using CO2 concentration to assess ventilation quality to indoor spaces

Peter McGarry , Lidia Morawska , Savinda Arambawatta Lekamge , Simon Witts
{"title":"Addressing actual and community expectations on CO2 concentrations within indoor spaces – A reasonably practicable methodology using CO2 concentration to assess ventilation quality to indoor spaces","authors":"Peter McGarry ,&nbsp;Lidia Morawska ,&nbsp;Savinda Arambawatta Lekamge ,&nbsp;Simon Witts","doi":"10.1016/j.indenv.2025.100101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The ability to quickly assess the performance of a ventilation system to deliver an adequate amount of clean air to the space relative to the number of occupants is important as part of the overall goal of ensuring healthy indoor air. Current debate within the scientific community clearly aims to influence government to legislate a CO<sub>2</sub> concentration as an indoor air quality standard. However, to properly consider this, government will likely demand quantitative data on contemporary indoor CO<sub>2</sub> concentrations and a tested and reasonably practicable method for use by building occupants. Our study addresses this research gap with the aim of testing and documenting how to operationalise CO<sub>2</sub> monitoring for use by occupants as an infection risk reduction tool within mechanically ventilated spaces. The related research objectives were 1) to inform the current scientific debate on an indoor air CO<sub>2</sub> concentration action level for improved ventilation quality and infection risk control, 2) to pilot and document a method for characterising indoor CO<sub>2</sub> concentrations within occupied spaces serviced by heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) systems and demonstrate it was reasonably practicable in terms of instrument cost and deployment utility, 3) assess the performance of a ventilation systems to deliver an adequate amount of clean air to indoor spaces relative to the number of space occupants, and 4) to action improvements in ventilation quality where identified. The method was informed by a literature review of various standards that described optimal number, location, and layout of sensors, resulting in demonstration of deployment of CO<sub>2</sub> sensors. Sensors were deployed within 1439 teaching and office spaces across 78 mechanically ventilated buildings. In 1025 (72 %) rooms, CO<sub>2</sub> concentration was &lt; 800 ppm, in 267 (18 %) between 800 ppm and 1000 ppm, and in 147 (10 %) &gt; 1000 ppm, during room occupancy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100665,"journal":{"name":"Indoor Environments","volume":"2 3","pages":"Article 100101"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indoor Environments","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S295036202500030X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The ability to quickly assess the performance of a ventilation system to deliver an adequate amount of clean air to the space relative to the number of occupants is important as part of the overall goal of ensuring healthy indoor air. Current debate within the scientific community clearly aims to influence government to legislate a CO2 concentration as an indoor air quality standard. However, to properly consider this, government will likely demand quantitative data on contemporary indoor CO2 concentrations and a tested and reasonably practicable method for use by building occupants. Our study addresses this research gap with the aim of testing and documenting how to operationalise CO2 monitoring for use by occupants as an infection risk reduction tool within mechanically ventilated spaces. The related research objectives were 1) to inform the current scientific debate on an indoor air CO2 concentration action level for improved ventilation quality and infection risk control, 2) to pilot and document a method for characterising indoor CO2 concentrations within occupied spaces serviced by heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) systems and demonstrate it was reasonably practicable in terms of instrument cost and deployment utility, 3) assess the performance of a ventilation systems to deliver an adequate amount of clean air to indoor spaces relative to the number of space occupants, and 4) to action improvements in ventilation quality where identified. The method was informed by a literature review of various standards that described optimal number, location, and layout of sensors, resulting in demonstration of deployment of CO2 sensors. Sensors were deployed within 1439 teaching and office spaces across 78 mechanically ventilated buildings. In 1025 (72 %) rooms, CO2 concentration was < 800 ppm, in 267 (18 %) between 800 ppm and 1000 ppm, and in 147 (10 %) > 1000 ppm, during room occupancy.
解决室内空间内二氧化碳浓度的实际和社区期望-一种合理可行的方法,使用二氧化碳浓度评估室内空间的通风质量
快速评估通风系统的性能,以便相对于居住者的数量向空间提供足够数量的清洁空气,这是确保健康室内空气总体目标的重要组成部分。目前科学界的争论显然旨在影响政府立法将二氧化碳浓度作为室内空气质量标准。然而,为了正确考虑这一点,政府可能会要求提供当代室内二氧化碳浓度的定量数据,以及一种经过测试的、合理可行的方法,供建筑物居住者使用。我们的研究解决了这一研究差距,目的是测试和记录如何在机械通风空间内将二氧化碳监测作为一种降低感染风险的工具,供居住者使用。相关的研究目标是:1)为当前关于改善通风质量和感染风险控制的室内空气二氧化碳浓度行动水平的科学辩论提供信息;2)试点和记录一种方法,用于表征由供暖、通风和空调(HVAC)系统提供服务的占用空间内的室内二氧化碳浓度,并证明它在仪器成本和部署效用方面是合理可行的。3)评估通风系统的性能,以提供足够的洁净空气到室内空间,相对于空间居住者的数量,以及4)采取行动改善通风质量。该方法是通过对各种标准的文献综述,这些标准描述了传感器的最佳数量、位置和布局,从而演示了二氧化碳传感器的部署。传感器部署在78座机械通风建筑的1439个教学和办公空间中。1025(72年 %)房间,二氧化碳浓度& lt; 800 ppm, 267年(18 %)800 ppm到1000 ppm, 147年(10 %)在1000年  ppm,在房间入住率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信