{"title":"Wheat leaf area index retrieval from drone-derived hyperspectral and LiDAR imagery using machine learning algorithms","authors":"Gabriel Mulero , David J. Bonfil , David Helman","doi":"10.1016/j.agrformet.2025.110648","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Leaf Area Index (LAI) is a key parameter that reflects canopy structure and influences photosynthetic activity. Traditional remote sensing methods using spectral indices usually struggle with saturation at LAI > 3.0 m<sup>2</sup> m<sup>–2</sup> in crop fields. Light detection and ranging (LiDAR) systems offer a solution by capturing detailed canopy structures.</div><div>This study used drone-based LiDAR and hyperspectral imagery to predict LAI across 60 plots in five wheat fields in Israel. Field LAI, assessed using a handheld optical sensor, ranged from 0.25 to 7.7 m<sup>2</sup> m<sup>–2</sup>. LiDAR-derived metrics, including height, gap fraction, and canopy volume features, were combined with spectral indices for LAI prediction. These metrics were used in simple linear regression (SLR) and five machine learning (ML) models: artificial neural network (ANN), random forest, ridge regression, relevance vector machine, and extreme gradient boosting. Shapley’s additive explanations identified key predictive features.</div><div>Results show that ML models significantly improved prediction performance (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.59–0.90) compared to single metric SLR models (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.09–0.67). Combined LiDAR-spectral models outperformed spectral- and LiDAR-only models. ANN achieved the best results, with a mean R<sup>2</sup> of 0.90, normalized RMSE of 6 %, and residual prediction deviation (RPD) score of 3.34, accurately predicting LAI up to 5.5 m<sup>2</sup> m<sup>–2</sup>. LiDAR alone or in combination with spectral metrics improved LAI predictions. While some spectral metrics ranked high, LiDAR-derived metrics, particularly canopy volume-related, consistently emerged among the most important features, with gap fraction and height metrics also contributing to the models. This study demonstrates the efficacy of drone-based LiDAR for non-destructively predicting LAI in wheat fields, offering a valuable tool for crop model calibration and evaluation and addressing the challenge of scaling from leaf to canopy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50839,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology","volume":"372 ","pages":"Article 110648"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168192325002680","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Leaf Area Index (LAI) is a key parameter that reflects canopy structure and influences photosynthetic activity. Traditional remote sensing methods using spectral indices usually struggle with saturation at LAI > 3.0 m2 m–2 in crop fields. Light detection and ranging (LiDAR) systems offer a solution by capturing detailed canopy structures.
This study used drone-based LiDAR and hyperspectral imagery to predict LAI across 60 plots in five wheat fields in Israel. Field LAI, assessed using a handheld optical sensor, ranged from 0.25 to 7.7 m2 m–2. LiDAR-derived metrics, including height, gap fraction, and canopy volume features, were combined with spectral indices for LAI prediction. These metrics were used in simple linear regression (SLR) and five machine learning (ML) models: artificial neural network (ANN), random forest, ridge regression, relevance vector machine, and extreme gradient boosting. Shapley’s additive explanations identified key predictive features.
Results show that ML models significantly improved prediction performance (R2 = 0.59–0.90) compared to single metric SLR models (R2 = 0.09–0.67). Combined LiDAR-spectral models outperformed spectral- and LiDAR-only models. ANN achieved the best results, with a mean R2 of 0.90, normalized RMSE of 6 %, and residual prediction deviation (RPD) score of 3.34, accurately predicting LAI up to 5.5 m2 m–2. LiDAR alone or in combination with spectral metrics improved LAI predictions. While some spectral metrics ranked high, LiDAR-derived metrics, particularly canopy volume-related, consistently emerged among the most important features, with gap fraction and height metrics also contributing to the models. This study demonstrates the efficacy of drone-based LiDAR for non-destructively predicting LAI in wheat fields, offering a valuable tool for crop model calibration and evaluation and addressing the challenge of scaling from leaf to canopy.
期刊介绍:
Agricultural and Forest Meteorology is an international journal for the publication of original articles and reviews on the inter-relationship between meteorology, agriculture, forestry, and natural ecosystems. Emphasis is on basic and applied scientific research relevant to practical problems in the field of plant and soil sciences, ecology and biogeochemistry as affected by weather as well as climate variability and change. Theoretical models should be tested against experimental data. Articles must appeal to an international audience. Special issues devoted to single topics are also published.
Typical topics include canopy micrometeorology (e.g. canopy radiation transfer, turbulence near the ground, evapotranspiration, energy balance, fluxes of trace gases), micrometeorological instrumentation (e.g., sensors for trace gases, flux measurement instruments, radiation measurement techniques), aerobiology (e.g. the dispersion of pollen, spores, insects and pesticides), biometeorology (e.g. the effect of weather and climate on plant distribution, crop yield, water-use efficiency, and plant phenology), forest-fire/weather interactions, and feedbacks from vegetation to weather and the climate system.