Bharti Sharma , Russell Keast , Djin Gie Liem , Yada Nolvachai , Andrew Costanzo
{"title":"Impact of protein on sensory attributes and liking of plant-based Milk alternatives","authors":"Bharti Sharma , Russell Keast , Djin Gie Liem , Yada Nolvachai , Andrew Costanzo","doi":"10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105617","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Plant-based milk alternatives (PBMAs) have a limited nutrient profile compared to dairy milk, primarily due to their lower protein content. Although fortification with protein can enhance their nutritional value, this addition changes the product's texture and introduces undesirable off-flavours, such as beaniness or chalkiness, which can hinder consumer acceptance. The primary aim of the study was to examine the impact of protein concentration (1 and 4 %) and source (soy, oat, pea) on the perception of sensory attributes and overall liking of PBMAs. Ninety-four consumers evaluated 6 lab-prepared PBMAs for liking using a 9-point hedonic scale. Optimal perception of attributes was assessed using just-about-right scales, and attribute analysis using check-all-that-apply. Penalty analysis was applied to evaluate liking drops, and logistic regression examined the relationship between protein source/concentration and sensory attribute perception. Low protein samples had higher overall liking than high protein (<em>p</em> < 0.001) with 50.7 % of the variance attributed to textural factors such as thickness and grittiness. Furthermore, on comparison with soy-based samples, beaniness was selected 2.34 times more in pea-based samples and chalkiness was selected 4.92 more times in oat-based samples. Protein concentration impacted perception of thickness, with high-protein samples being selected as thick 22.9 times more often than low protein samples. Overall, adding protein to PBMAs improves their nutrient profile, matching its protein content with dairy milk, but it also introduces textural challenges that reduces consumer acceptance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":322,"journal":{"name":"Food Quality and Preference","volume":"133 ","pages":"Article 105617"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Quality and Preference","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329325001922","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Plant-based milk alternatives (PBMAs) have a limited nutrient profile compared to dairy milk, primarily due to their lower protein content. Although fortification with protein can enhance their nutritional value, this addition changes the product's texture and introduces undesirable off-flavours, such as beaniness or chalkiness, which can hinder consumer acceptance. The primary aim of the study was to examine the impact of protein concentration (1 and 4 %) and source (soy, oat, pea) on the perception of sensory attributes and overall liking of PBMAs. Ninety-four consumers evaluated 6 lab-prepared PBMAs for liking using a 9-point hedonic scale. Optimal perception of attributes was assessed using just-about-right scales, and attribute analysis using check-all-that-apply. Penalty analysis was applied to evaluate liking drops, and logistic regression examined the relationship between protein source/concentration and sensory attribute perception. Low protein samples had higher overall liking than high protein (p < 0.001) with 50.7 % of the variance attributed to textural factors such as thickness and grittiness. Furthermore, on comparison with soy-based samples, beaniness was selected 2.34 times more in pea-based samples and chalkiness was selected 4.92 more times in oat-based samples. Protein concentration impacted perception of thickness, with high-protein samples being selected as thick 22.9 times more often than low protein samples. Overall, adding protein to PBMAs improves their nutrient profile, matching its protein content with dairy milk, but it also introduces textural challenges that reduces consumer acceptance.
期刊介绍:
Food Quality and Preference is a journal devoted to sensory, consumer and behavioural research in food and non-food products. It publishes original research, critical reviews, and short communications in sensory and consumer science, and sensometrics. In addition, the journal publishes special invited issues on important timely topics and from relevant conferences. These are aimed at bridging the gap between research and application, bringing together authors and readers in consumer and market research, sensory science, sensometrics and sensory evaluation, nutrition and food choice, as well as food research, product development and sensory quality assurance. Submissions to Food Quality and Preference are limited to papers that include some form of human measurement; papers that are limited to physical/chemical measures or the routine application of sensory, consumer or econometric analysis will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution in line with the journal''s coverage as outlined below.