Understanding public perceptions of smart farming technologies

IF 4.9 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Jeanine Ammann , Gabriele Mack , Nadja El Benni , Rita Saleh
{"title":"Understanding public perceptions of smart farming technologies","authors":"Jeanine Ammann ,&nbsp;Gabriele Mack ,&nbsp;Nadja El Benni ,&nbsp;Rita Saleh","doi":"10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105618","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Whether the public accepts food produced using new technologies can be a decisive factor for their introduction. It is therefore important to understand public perceptions and address concerns at an early stage. We conducted two studies to investigate public perceptions of smart farming technologies. Study 1 involved an online survey of 287 participants in the German-speaking parts of Switzerland in 2021 (using convenience sampling). We took an exploratory approach using qualitative assessments of two plant-related technologies (hoeing robot and spray drone) and two animal-related technologies (milking robot and virtual fence). The participants provided their spontaneous associations for these technologies. Study 2 involved an online survey of 383 participants from the French- and German-speaking parts of Switzerland (a representative sample) in 2023, following a quantitative approach to analyse the general perception of two specific smart farming technologies often used in Switzerland (hoeing and milking robots). We investigated how political orientation and the perceived importance of food naturalness influenced the acceptance of food produced with the investigated technologies. Across the two studies, the public expressed positive associations with digital technologies, especially plant-related ones, but specific concerns were identified for each technology, with animal welfare being the major concern for virtual fences. Further, perceptions of farmers significantly influenced the affective responses towards milking robots, whereas the importance of food naturalness significantly influenced responses towards hoeing robots. These findings are promising for efforts to increase public acceptance of food produced with these technologies. Implications for policy and practise are discussed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":322,"journal":{"name":"Food Quality and Preference","volume":"133 ","pages":"Article 105618"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Quality and Preference","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329325001934","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Whether the public accepts food produced using new technologies can be a decisive factor for their introduction. It is therefore important to understand public perceptions and address concerns at an early stage. We conducted two studies to investigate public perceptions of smart farming technologies. Study 1 involved an online survey of 287 participants in the German-speaking parts of Switzerland in 2021 (using convenience sampling). We took an exploratory approach using qualitative assessments of two plant-related technologies (hoeing robot and spray drone) and two animal-related technologies (milking robot and virtual fence). The participants provided their spontaneous associations for these technologies. Study 2 involved an online survey of 383 participants from the French- and German-speaking parts of Switzerland (a representative sample) in 2023, following a quantitative approach to analyse the general perception of two specific smart farming technologies often used in Switzerland (hoeing and milking robots). We investigated how political orientation and the perceived importance of food naturalness influenced the acceptance of food produced with the investigated technologies. Across the two studies, the public expressed positive associations with digital technologies, especially plant-related ones, but specific concerns were identified for each technology, with animal welfare being the major concern for virtual fences. Further, perceptions of farmers significantly influenced the affective responses towards milking robots, whereas the importance of food naturalness significantly influenced responses towards hoeing robots. These findings are promising for efforts to increase public acceptance of food produced with these technologies. Implications for policy and practise are discussed.
了解公众对智能农业技术的看法
公众是否接受使用新技术生产的食品可能是引进新技术的决定性因素。因此,在早期阶段了解公众的看法并解决他们的关切是很重要的。我们进行了两项研究,调查公众对智能农业技术的看法。研究1涉及2021年在瑞士德语区对287名参与者进行的在线调查(使用方便抽样)。我们采用了一种探索性的方法,对两种与植物相关的技术(锄地机器人和喷洒无人机)和两种与动物相关的技术(挤奶机器人和虚拟围栏)进行定性评估。参与者提供了他们对这些技术的自发联想。研究2涉及在2023年对来自瑞士法语和德语地区的383名参与者(代表性样本)进行在线调查,采用定量方法分析瑞士常用的两种特定智能农业技术(锄地和挤奶机器人)的总体看法。我们调查了政治取向和食品天然性的感知重要性如何影响接受与所调查的技术生产的食品。在这两项研究中,公众表达了对数字技术的积极联系,尤其是与植物相关的技术,但每种技术都有具体的担忧,动物福利是虚拟围栏的主要担忧。此外,对农民的看法显著影响了对挤奶机器人的情感反应,而食物自然性的重要性显著影响了对锄地机器人的反应。这些发现为提高公众对这些技术生产的食品的接受度带来了希望。对政策和实践的影响进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Food Quality and Preference
Food Quality and Preference 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
15.10%
发文量
263
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Food Quality and Preference is a journal devoted to sensory, consumer and behavioural research in food and non-food products. It publishes original research, critical reviews, and short communications in sensory and consumer science, and sensometrics. In addition, the journal publishes special invited issues on important timely topics and from relevant conferences. These are aimed at bridging the gap between research and application, bringing together authors and readers in consumer and market research, sensory science, sensometrics and sensory evaluation, nutrition and food choice, as well as food research, product development and sensory quality assurance. Submissions to Food Quality and Preference are limited to papers that include some form of human measurement; papers that are limited to physical/chemical measures or the routine application of sensory, consumer or econometric analysis will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution in line with the journal''s coverage as outlined below.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信