{"title":"Understanding public perceptions of smart farming technologies","authors":"Jeanine Ammann , Gabriele Mack , Nadja El Benni , Rita Saleh","doi":"10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105618","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Whether the public accepts food produced using new technologies can be a decisive factor for their introduction. It is therefore important to understand public perceptions and address concerns at an early stage. We conducted two studies to investigate public perceptions of smart farming technologies. Study 1 involved an online survey of 287 participants in the German-speaking parts of Switzerland in 2021 (using convenience sampling). We took an exploratory approach using qualitative assessments of two plant-related technologies (hoeing robot and spray drone) and two animal-related technologies (milking robot and virtual fence). The participants provided their spontaneous associations for these technologies. Study 2 involved an online survey of 383 participants from the French- and German-speaking parts of Switzerland (a representative sample) in 2023, following a quantitative approach to analyse the general perception of two specific smart farming technologies often used in Switzerland (hoeing and milking robots). We investigated how political orientation and the perceived importance of food naturalness influenced the acceptance of food produced with the investigated technologies. Across the two studies, the public expressed positive associations with digital technologies, especially plant-related ones, but specific concerns were identified for each technology, with animal welfare being the major concern for virtual fences. Further, perceptions of farmers significantly influenced the affective responses towards milking robots, whereas the importance of food naturalness significantly influenced responses towards hoeing robots. These findings are promising for efforts to increase public acceptance of food produced with these technologies. Implications for policy and practise are discussed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":322,"journal":{"name":"Food Quality and Preference","volume":"133 ","pages":"Article 105618"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Quality and Preference","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329325001934","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Whether the public accepts food produced using new technologies can be a decisive factor for their introduction. It is therefore important to understand public perceptions and address concerns at an early stage. We conducted two studies to investigate public perceptions of smart farming technologies. Study 1 involved an online survey of 287 participants in the German-speaking parts of Switzerland in 2021 (using convenience sampling). We took an exploratory approach using qualitative assessments of two plant-related technologies (hoeing robot and spray drone) and two animal-related technologies (milking robot and virtual fence). The participants provided their spontaneous associations for these technologies. Study 2 involved an online survey of 383 participants from the French- and German-speaking parts of Switzerland (a representative sample) in 2023, following a quantitative approach to analyse the general perception of two specific smart farming technologies often used in Switzerland (hoeing and milking robots). We investigated how political orientation and the perceived importance of food naturalness influenced the acceptance of food produced with the investigated technologies. Across the two studies, the public expressed positive associations with digital technologies, especially plant-related ones, but specific concerns were identified for each technology, with animal welfare being the major concern for virtual fences. Further, perceptions of farmers significantly influenced the affective responses towards milking robots, whereas the importance of food naturalness significantly influenced responses towards hoeing robots. These findings are promising for efforts to increase public acceptance of food produced with these technologies. Implications for policy and practise are discussed.
期刊介绍:
Food Quality and Preference is a journal devoted to sensory, consumer and behavioural research in food and non-food products. It publishes original research, critical reviews, and short communications in sensory and consumer science, and sensometrics. In addition, the journal publishes special invited issues on important timely topics and from relevant conferences. These are aimed at bridging the gap between research and application, bringing together authors and readers in consumer and market research, sensory science, sensometrics and sensory evaluation, nutrition and food choice, as well as food research, product development and sensory quality assurance. Submissions to Food Quality and Preference are limited to papers that include some form of human measurement; papers that are limited to physical/chemical measures or the routine application of sensory, consumer or econometric analysis will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution in line with the journal''s coverage as outlined below.