Animal-assisted services in Australia and New Zealand intensive care units: A cross-sectional survey

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Kristen Ranse RN, PhD , Tania Lovell RN, MPH-HM , Belinda Henderson RN, MAdvHIthPracIC , Kate Kyiet MMgt , Kate Martin BBus , Sumeet Rai FCICM
{"title":"Animal-assisted services in Australia and New Zealand intensive care units: A cross-sectional survey","authors":"Kristen Ranse RN, PhD ,&nbsp;Tania Lovell RN, MPH-HM ,&nbsp;Belinda Henderson RN, MAdvHIthPracIC ,&nbsp;Kate Kyiet MMgt ,&nbsp;Kate Martin BBus ,&nbsp;Sumeet Rai FCICM","doi":"10.1016/j.aucc.2025.101272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>While animal-assisted services have demonstrated clinical benefits for patients in acute and subacute healthcare settings, there is a paucity of research evidence regarding these services in intensive care units (ICUs).</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The objectives of this study were (1) to identify the prevalence of animal-assisted services in ICUs in Australia and New Zealand and (2) to gain an understanding of the key characteristics, practices, and barriers of animal-assisted services in ICUs.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Between February and May 2024, a cross-sectional online survey was distributed via convenience and snowball sampling approaches to a representative from all Australian and New Zealand ICUs. Descriptive statistics were calculated to summarise survey responses.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>From the survey responses (n = 63; response rate: 47%), animal-assisted services were or had been offered in 44% of ICUs (n = 28). While there were variations in the characteristics and delivery of animal-assisted services, every service involved dogs, targeted patients as recipients of the service, and required patient and staff hand hygiene. Most respondents indicated that dogs need to be washed and brushed prior to visiting the ICU and remain on a leash while in the ICU. There were no reports of adverse events. Common barriers to animal-assisted services included a lack of program initiation, staffing constraints, infection control policies, and limited funding.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study provides preliminary evidence of the prevalence and characteristics of animal-assisted services in Australian and New Zealand ICUs. Variation in the characteristics of animal-assisted services demonstrates a need for identification of best practices pertaining to animal-assisted services in the ICU and the development of guidelines to support the implementation of these services. Future interventional studies are required to provide further evidence of the feasibility and effectiveness of animal-assisted services, both as meet-and-greet-style support programs and treatment interventions in ICUs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51239,"journal":{"name":"Australian Critical Care","volume":"38 5","pages":"Article 101272"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S103673142500102X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

While animal-assisted services have demonstrated clinical benefits for patients in acute and subacute healthcare settings, there is a paucity of research evidence regarding these services in intensive care units (ICUs).

Objective

The objectives of this study were (1) to identify the prevalence of animal-assisted services in ICUs in Australia and New Zealand and (2) to gain an understanding of the key characteristics, practices, and barriers of animal-assisted services in ICUs.

Methods

Between February and May 2024, a cross-sectional online survey was distributed via convenience and snowball sampling approaches to a representative from all Australian and New Zealand ICUs. Descriptive statistics were calculated to summarise survey responses.

Results

From the survey responses (n = 63; response rate: 47%), animal-assisted services were or had been offered in 44% of ICUs (n = 28). While there were variations in the characteristics and delivery of animal-assisted services, every service involved dogs, targeted patients as recipients of the service, and required patient and staff hand hygiene. Most respondents indicated that dogs need to be washed and brushed prior to visiting the ICU and remain on a leash while in the ICU. There were no reports of adverse events. Common barriers to animal-assisted services included a lack of program initiation, staffing constraints, infection control policies, and limited funding.

Conclusions

This study provides preliminary evidence of the prevalence and characteristics of animal-assisted services in Australian and New Zealand ICUs. Variation in the characteristics of animal-assisted services demonstrates a need for identification of best practices pertaining to animal-assisted services in the ICU and the development of guidelines to support the implementation of these services. Future interventional studies are required to provide further evidence of the feasibility and effectiveness of animal-assisted services, both as meet-and-greet-style support programs and treatment interventions in ICUs.
澳大利亚和新西兰重症监护病房的动物辅助服务:一项横断面调查
虽然动物辅助服务已经证明对急性和亚急性医疗保健环境中的患者有临床益处,但在重症监护病房(icu)中缺乏关于这些服务的研究证据。本研究的目的是:(1)确定动物辅助服务在澳大利亚和新西兰icu中的流行程度;(2)了解icu中动物辅助服务的主要特征、实践和障碍。方法在2024年2月至5月期间,通过便利抽样和滚雪球抽样的方式对澳大利亚和新西兰所有icu的代表进行了横断面在线调查。计算描述性统计以总结调查结果。结果调查问卷(n = 63;应答率:47%),44%的icu (n = 28)正在或曾经提供动物辅助服务。虽然动物辅助服务的特点和提供方式各不相同,但每项服务都涉及狗,目标患者作为服务的接受者,并要求患者和工作人员保持手部卫生。大多数受访者表示,狗在去重症监护室之前需要清洗和刷牙,在重症监护室时需要拴上皮带。没有不良事件的报告。动物辅助服务的常见障碍包括缺乏项目启动、人员配备限制、感染控制政策和资金有限。结论本研究为动物辅助服务在澳大利亚和新西兰icu的流行和特点提供了初步证据。动物辅助服务特点的变化表明,有必要确定ICU动物辅助服务的最佳实践,并制定支持这些服务实施的指导方针。未来的介入研究需要提供进一步的证据来证明动物辅助服务的可行性和有效性,无论是作为见面和问候式的支持计划还是icu的治疗干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australian Critical Care
Australian Critical Care NURSING-NURSING
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
148
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australian Critical Care is the official journal of the Australian College of Critical Care Nurses (ACCCN). It is a bi-monthly peer-reviewed journal, providing clinically relevant research, reviews and articles of interest to the critical care community. Australian Critical Care publishes peer-reviewed scholarly papers that report research findings, research-based reviews, discussion papers and commentaries which are of interest to an international readership of critical care practitioners, educators, administrators and researchers. Interprofessional articles are welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信