Frequencies of persistence, activity pacing, fear avoidance and general stress in acute neck pain

IF 2.1 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Morf Rita , Reicherzer Leah , Degenfellner Jürgen , Hasenbring Monika , Erat Anna , Hotz-Boendermaker Sabina
{"title":"Frequencies of persistence, activity pacing, fear avoidance and general stress in acute neck pain","authors":"Morf Rita ,&nbsp;Reicherzer Leah ,&nbsp;Degenfellner Jürgen ,&nbsp;Hasenbring Monika ,&nbsp;Erat Anna ,&nbsp;Hotz-Boendermaker Sabina","doi":"10.1016/j.cpnec.2025.100308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Neck pain (NP) is a common musculoskeletal health problem, persisting in 47 % of cases. A person's engagement in daily activities is defined as activity patterns (eustress persistence, distress persistence, activity pacing, and fear avoidance) that influence the development and continuation of pain. These behaviors may be linked to heightened stress levels, further negatively impacting pain perception. Understanding these relationships is vital, given the intricate interplay between stress, pain, and activity patterns. This study aims to assess the frequency of activity patterns and identify their impact on stress levels in participants with acute NP.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>125 individuals aged 18–65 with acute NP were recruited. Activity patterns were identified using the Avoidance-Endurance Fast Screen, which calculated the frequencies of activity patterns. Furthermore, subjective stress was evaluated using the Stress and Coping Inventory and objective stress using hair cortisol concentration to determine which activity pattern group experienced the highest stress.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Most participants were classified in the eustress persistence group (52 %), followed by activity pacing (22.8 %), distress persistence (19.5 %), and fear avoidance (5.7 %). Subjective and objective stress levels consistently remained below established reference values. Analysis of activity pattern groups showed that distress persistence had the highest subjective stress levels, followed by fear avoidance, while activity pacing had the lowest. No relevant differences between the activity pattern groups were observed in the objective stress measurements.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>To the best of our knowledge, this study represents the first investigation of frequencies of activity patterns and subjective and objective stress in acute NP.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72656,"journal":{"name":"Comprehensive psychoneuroendocrinology","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 100308"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comprehensive psychoneuroendocrinology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266649762500027X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Neck pain (NP) is a common musculoskeletal health problem, persisting in 47 % of cases. A person's engagement in daily activities is defined as activity patterns (eustress persistence, distress persistence, activity pacing, and fear avoidance) that influence the development and continuation of pain. These behaviors may be linked to heightened stress levels, further negatively impacting pain perception. Understanding these relationships is vital, given the intricate interplay between stress, pain, and activity patterns. This study aims to assess the frequency of activity patterns and identify their impact on stress levels in participants with acute NP.

Methods

125 individuals aged 18–65 with acute NP were recruited. Activity patterns were identified using the Avoidance-Endurance Fast Screen, which calculated the frequencies of activity patterns. Furthermore, subjective stress was evaluated using the Stress and Coping Inventory and objective stress using hair cortisol concentration to determine which activity pattern group experienced the highest stress.

Results

Most participants were classified in the eustress persistence group (52 %), followed by activity pacing (22.8 %), distress persistence (19.5 %), and fear avoidance (5.7 %). Subjective and objective stress levels consistently remained below established reference values. Analysis of activity pattern groups showed that distress persistence had the highest subjective stress levels, followed by fear avoidance, while activity pacing had the lowest. No relevant differences between the activity pattern groups were observed in the objective stress measurements.

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, this study represents the first investigation of frequencies of activity patterns and subjective and objective stress in acute NP.
急性颈痛患者持续、活动节奏、恐惧回避和一般压力的频率
颈痛(NP)是一种常见的肌肉骨骼健康问题,47%的病例持续存在。一个人对日常活动的参与被定义为影响疼痛发展和持续的活动模式(压力持续、痛苦持续、活动节奏和恐惧回避)。这些行为可能与压力水平升高有关,进一步对疼痛感知产生负面影响。考虑到压力、疼痛和活动模式之间错综复杂的相互作用,理解这些关系至关重要。本研究旨在评估活动模式的频率,并确定其对急性NP参与者压力水平的影响。方法选取年龄在18 ~ 65岁的急性NP患者125例。活动模式是通过逃避-耐力快速屏幕来确定的,该屏幕计算了活动模式的频率。此外,使用压力和应对量表评估主观压力,使用毛发皮质醇浓度评估客观压力,以确定哪个活动模式组承受的压力最大。结果以压力持续组(52%)为主,其次为活动节奏组(22.8%)、痛苦持续组(19.5%)和恐惧回避组(5.7%)。主观和客观压力水平始终低于既定参考值。对活动模式组的分析显示,痛苦持续的主观压力水平最高,其次是恐惧回避,而活动节奏的主观压力水平最低。在客观应力测量中,活动模式组之间没有观察到相关差异。据我们所知,这项研究首次调查了急性NP患者的活动模式频率和主观和客观应激。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Comprehensive psychoneuroendocrinology
Comprehensive psychoneuroendocrinology Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
62 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信