Concentrated Cognitive-Behavior Therapy for Unmedicated Children and Adolescents With Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder in Routine Clinical Care: A Randomized Controlled Trial With a 6-Month Naturalistic Follow-up

IF 3.4 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Laura Hermida-Barros, Blanca García-Delgar, Sara Lera-Miguel, Eduard Forcadell, Elena Moreno, Mireia Primé-Tous, Núria Jaurrieta, Xavier Segú, Enric Vilajosana, Carles Soriano-Mas, Lorena Fernández de la Cruz, Eduard Vieta, Joaquim Radua, Luisa Lázaro, Miquel A. Fullana
{"title":"Concentrated Cognitive-Behavior Therapy for Unmedicated Children and Adolescents With Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder in Routine Clinical Care: A Randomized Controlled Trial With a 6-Month Naturalistic Follow-up","authors":"Laura Hermida-Barros,&nbsp;Blanca García-Delgar,&nbsp;Sara Lera-Miguel,&nbsp;Eduard Forcadell,&nbsp;Elena Moreno,&nbsp;Mireia Primé-Tous,&nbsp;Núria Jaurrieta,&nbsp;Xavier Segú,&nbsp;Enric Vilajosana,&nbsp;Carles Soriano-Mas,&nbsp;Lorena Fernández de la Cruz,&nbsp;Eduard Vieta,&nbsp;Joaquim Radua,&nbsp;Luisa Lázaro,&nbsp;Miquel A. Fullana","doi":"10.1016/j.beth.2025.01.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Cognitive-behavior therapy (CBT) is effective for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Because CBT requires significant time and resources, there is an increased interest in developing shorter formats of CBT for OCD (i.e., fewer sessions or in less time). We conducted a randomized single-blind controlled trial to investigate the effectiveness of concentrated CBT (co-CBT; 20 hours of therapist time across one month) compared to a waiting list (WL) in 30 unmedicated children and adolescents with OCD aged 7–17 in routine clinical care. Co-CBT was superior to the WL in reducing OCD symptom severity at posttreatment (primary endpoint; Cohen’s <em>d</em> = 1.76) and these results were maintained through the end of a naturalistic 6-month follow-up. Participants initially randomized to the WL were offered co-CBT at the end of the trial and post-hoc analyses showed that they had similar improvements to those initially randomized to co-CBT. In post-hoc predictor analyses, participants aged 7–12, compared to those aged 13–17, and those with higher baseline OCD severity showed better posttreatment outcomes. Co-CBT is an effective intervention for unmedicated children and adolescents with OCD in routine clinical care. Studies including more robust control groups and larger samples are needed to replicate and expand these findings. Trial registration number: NCT04042038.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48359,"journal":{"name":"Behavior Therapy","volume":"56 4","pages":"Pages 799-811"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavior Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005789425000024","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cognitive-behavior therapy (CBT) is effective for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Because CBT requires significant time and resources, there is an increased interest in developing shorter formats of CBT for OCD (i.e., fewer sessions or in less time). We conducted a randomized single-blind controlled trial to investigate the effectiveness of concentrated CBT (co-CBT; 20 hours of therapist time across one month) compared to a waiting list (WL) in 30 unmedicated children and adolescents with OCD aged 7–17 in routine clinical care. Co-CBT was superior to the WL in reducing OCD symptom severity at posttreatment (primary endpoint; Cohen’s d = 1.76) and these results were maintained through the end of a naturalistic 6-month follow-up. Participants initially randomized to the WL were offered co-CBT at the end of the trial and post-hoc analyses showed that they had similar improvements to those initially randomized to co-CBT. In post-hoc predictor analyses, participants aged 7–12, compared to those aged 13–17, and those with higher baseline OCD severity showed better posttreatment outcomes. Co-CBT is an effective intervention for unmedicated children and adolescents with OCD in routine clinical care. Studies including more robust control groups and larger samples are needed to replicate and expand these findings. Trial registration number: NCT04042038.
集中认知行为疗法在常规临床护理中治疗未服药的儿童和青少年强迫症:一项6个月自然随访的随机对照试验
认知行为疗法(CBT)是治疗强迫症(OCD)的有效方法。由于CBT需要大量的时间和资源,人们对开发针对强迫症的更短形式的CBT(即更少的会话或更短的时间)越来越感兴趣。我们进行了一项随机单盲对照试验来研究集中CBT (co-CBT;与等候名单(WL)相比,30名7-17岁未接受药物治疗的强迫症儿童和青少年接受常规临床护理。在治疗后减轻强迫症症状严重程度方面,联合cbt优于WL(主要终点;Cohen的d = 1.76),这些结果在6个月的自然随访结束时保持不变。最初随机分配到WL的参与者在试验结束时接受了联合cbt治疗,事后分析表明,他们与最初随机分配到联合cbt治疗的参与者有相似的改善。在事后预测分析中,与13-17岁的参与者相比,7-12岁的参与者和基线强迫症严重程度较高的参与者表现出更好的治疗后结果。在常规临床护理中,联合认知行为治疗是对未接受药物治疗的儿童和青少年强迫症的有效干预。需要包括更强大的对照组和更大的样本的研究来复制和扩展这些发现。试验注册号:NCT04042038。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Behavior Therapy
Behavior Therapy Multiple-
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
2.70%
发文量
113
审稿时长
121 days
期刊介绍: Behavior Therapy is a quarterly international journal devoted to the application of the behavioral and cognitive sciences to the conceptualization, assessment, and treatment of psychopathology and related clinical problems. It is intended for mental health professionals and students from all related disciplines who wish to remain current in these areas and provides a vehicle for scientist-practitioners and clinical scientists to report the results of their original empirical research. Although the major emphasis is placed upon empirical research, methodological and theoretical papers as well as evaluative reviews of the literature will also be published. Controlled single-case designs and clinical replication series are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信