An Idionomic Network Analysis of Trichotillomania Treatment Processes: Gathering Group-Level and Individual-Level Insights to Inform a Personalized Therapeutic Framework

IF 3.8 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Mercedes G. Woolley, Baljinder K. Sahdra, Emily M. Bowers, Leila K. Capel, Michael P. Twohig, Michael E. Levin
{"title":"An Idionomic Network Analysis of Trichotillomania Treatment Processes: Gathering Group-Level and Individual-Level Insights to Inform a Personalized Therapeutic Framework","authors":"Mercedes G. Woolley,&nbsp;Baljinder K. Sahdra,&nbsp;Emily M. Bowers,&nbsp;Leila K. Capel,&nbsp;Michael P. Twohig,&nbsp;Michael E. Levin","doi":"10.1016/j.beth.2025.01.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Trichotillomania, characterized by repetitive hair-pulling, leads to significant distress and impairment. Heterogeneity in symptom profiles challenges the effectiveness of treatment protocols for trichotillomania. Recent research endorses personalized treatment, emphasizing the assessment of biopsychosocial processes to tailor interventions more closely to the individual. This shift to a process-based, person-centered framework necessitates analytic methods capable of probing beyond nomothetic patterns to unveil nuanced individual-level processes. This study utilized Group Iterative Multiple Model Estimation (GIMME) to examine group-level and individual-level network dynamics as an initial step towards a process-based treatment framework for trichotillomania. Ecological momentary assessment data from 54 affected individuals were analyzed to identify shared patterns applicable at the group level and individual level for individualized treatment. Analysis revealed a nomothetic process dynamically related to cognitive fixation on the urge to pull. At the individual level, notable variability in network structures emerged. While centrality measures consistently identified the urge to pull as a pivotal process within GIMME individual-level networks, the influence of other processes differed considerably between individuals. Results indicate that despite some shared components, the heterogeneity within individual networks calls for customized treatment approaches, and the assessment of psychological process dynamics at the individual level. These insights support incorporating idionomic methods into the developmental stages of personalized interventions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48359,"journal":{"name":"Behavior Therapy","volume":"56 4","pages":"Pages 851-865"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavior Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005789425000085","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Trichotillomania, characterized by repetitive hair-pulling, leads to significant distress and impairment. Heterogeneity in symptom profiles challenges the effectiveness of treatment protocols for trichotillomania. Recent research endorses personalized treatment, emphasizing the assessment of biopsychosocial processes to tailor interventions more closely to the individual. This shift to a process-based, person-centered framework necessitates analytic methods capable of probing beyond nomothetic patterns to unveil nuanced individual-level processes. This study utilized Group Iterative Multiple Model Estimation (GIMME) to examine group-level and individual-level network dynamics as an initial step towards a process-based treatment framework for trichotillomania. Ecological momentary assessment data from 54 affected individuals were analyzed to identify shared patterns applicable at the group level and individual level for individualized treatment. Analysis revealed a nomothetic process dynamically related to cognitive fixation on the urge to pull. At the individual level, notable variability in network structures emerged. While centrality measures consistently identified the urge to pull as a pivotal process within GIMME individual-level networks, the influence of other processes differed considerably between individuals. Results indicate that despite some shared components, the heterogeneity within individual networks calls for customized treatment approaches, and the assessment of psychological process dynamics at the individual level. These insights support incorporating idionomic methods into the developmental stages of personalized interventions.
拔毛癖治疗过程的习惯网络分析:收集群体水平和个人水平的见解,以告知个性化的治疗框架
拔毛癖以反复拔毛为特征,会导致严重的痛苦和损害。症状特征的异质性挑战了拔毛症治疗方案的有效性。最近的研究支持个性化治疗,强调对生物心理社会过程的评估,以使干预更贴近个体。这种向以过程为基础、以人为中心的框架的转变需要分析方法,这些分析方法能够探索超越规则模式的东西,从而揭示细微的个人层面的过程。本研究利用群体迭代多模型估计(GIMME)来研究群体层面和个人层面的网络动态,作为建立拔毛癖过程治疗框架的第一步。分析了54个受影响个体的生态瞬时评估数据,以确定适用于群体水平和个体水平的个体化治疗的共享模式。分析揭示了一个与拉冲动的认知固定动态相关的本体过程。在个体层面上,网络结构出现了显著的可变性。虽然中心性测量始终将拉的冲动确定为GIMME个人层面网络中的关键过程,但其他过程的影响在个人之间差异很大。结果表明,尽管存在一些共同的成分,但个体网络中的异质性要求定制治疗方法,并在个体水平上评估心理过程动态。这些见解支持将习惯方法纳入个性化干预的发展阶段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Behavior Therapy
Behavior Therapy Multiple-
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
2.70%
发文量
113
审稿时长
121 days
期刊介绍: Behavior Therapy is a quarterly international journal devoted to the application of the behavioral and cognitive sciences to the conceptualization, assessment, and treatment of psychopathology and related clinical problems. It is intended for mental health professionals and students from all related disciplines who wish to remain current in these areas and provides a vehicle for scientist-practitioners and clinical scientists to report the results of their original empirical research. Although the major emphasis is placed upon empirical research, methodological and theoretical papers as well as evaluative reviews of the literature will also be published. Controlled single-case designs and clinical replication series are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信