Changes in the Temporal Targeting of the U.S. National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for SO2 Reduce Average and Peak Emissions from Coal Power Plants

IF 10.8 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Joanna H. Slusarewicz, Valerie J. Karplus
{"title":"Changes in the Temporal Targeting of the U.S. National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for SO2 Reduce Average and Peak Emissions from Coal Power Plants","authors":"Joanna H. Slusarewicz, Valerie J. Karplus","doi":"10.1021/acs.est.4c10718","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The U.S. National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) protect public health by limiting ambient pollutant concentrations, but effects at power plants are not well characterized. We estimate how a 2010 SO<sub>2</sub> NAAQS change that altered policy targeting from peak hourly emissions to annually aggregated hourly emissions affected SO<sub>2</sub> emissions from coal-fired power plants. Using data on electricity generating unit (EGU) characteristics, SO<sub>2</sub> emissions, fuel prices, and PM<sub>2.5</sub> NAAQS classifications from 2001 to 2019 from public data sources, we estimate that, after a county was classified under the 2010 SO<sub>2</sub> standard, EGUs reduced SO<sub>2</sub> emissions during daily maximum hours by 31.6% (95% CI [−0.381, −0.247]) at the 99th percentile and 34.4% (95% CI [−0.424, −0.253]) at the 50th percentile. After a nearby ambient SO<sub>2</sub> monitor was added to assess NAAQS compliance, hourly emissions fell by 12.4% (95% CI [−0.188, −0.054]) at the 99th percentile and 14.4% (95% CI [−0.228, −0.050]) at the 50th percentile. Our results also suggest the new standard had the same effect on peak hourly SO<sub>2</sub> emissions as median and that plants in counties prioritized for early designation were less responsive to the policy change. These results suggest that the 2010 SO<sub>2</sub> NAAQS change may have reduced SO<sub>2</sub> emissions but may not have had an outsized impact on peak emissions despite policy guidance encouraging their control.","PeriodicalId":36,"journal":{"name":"环境科学与技术","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"环境科学与技术","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c10718","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The U.S. National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) protect public health by limiting ambient pollutant concentrations, but effects at power plants are not well characterized. We estimate how a 2010 SO2 NAAQS change that altered policy targeting from peak hourly emissions to annually aggregated hourly emissions affected SO2 emissions from coal-fired power plants. Using data on electricity generating unit (EGU) characteristics, SO2 emissions, fuel prices, and PM2.5 NAAQS classifications from 2001 to 2019 from public data sources, we estimate that, after a county was classified under the 2010 SO2 standard, EGUs reduced SO2 emissions during daily maximum hours by 31.6% (95% CI [−0.381, −0.247]) at the 99th percentile and 34.4% (95% CI [−0.424, −0.253]) at the 50th percentile. After a nearby ambient SO2 monitor was added to assess NAAQS compliance, hourly emissions fell by 12.4% (95% CI [−0.188, −0.054]) at the 99th percentile and 14.4% (95% CI [−0.228, −0.050]) at the 50th percentile. Our results also suggest the new standard had the same effect on peak hourly SO2 emissions as median and that plants in counties prioritized for early designation were less responsive to the policy change. These results suggest that the 2010 SO2 NAAQS change may have reduced SO2 emissions but may not have had an outsized impact on peak emissions despite policy guidance encouraging their control.

Abstract Image

美国国家环境空气质量标准(NAAQS)二氧化硫时间目标的变化减少了燃煤电厂的平均和峰值排放量
美国国家环境空气质量标准(NAAQS)通过限制环境污染物浓度来保护公众健康,但对发电厂的影响尚未得到很好的描述。我们估计了2010年SO2 NAAQS的变化是如何将政策目标从峰值小时排放改变为年度累计小时排放影响燃煤电厂的SO2排放的。利用2001年至2019年公共数据来源的发电机组(EGU)特征、二氧化硫排放、燃料价格和PM2.5 NAAQS分类数据,我们估计,在一个县被划分为2010年二氧化硫标准后,EGU在第99百分位数上减少了31.6% (95% CI[−0.381,−0.247]),在第50百分位数上减少了34.4% (95% CI[−0.424,−0.253])。在附近添加环境二氧化硫监测仪以评估NAAQS合规性后,每小时排放量在第99个百分位数下降12.4% (95% CI[- 0.188, - 0.054]),在第50个百分位数下降14.4% (95% CI[- 0.228, - 0.050])。我们的研究结果还表明,新标准对每小时二氧化硫峰值排放的影响与中位数相同,而且在优先指定的县,工厂对政策变化的反应较弱。这些结果表明,2010年SO2 NAAQS的变化可能减少了SO2排放,但可能没有对峰值排放产生过大的影响,尽管政策指导鼓励控制它们。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
环境科学与技术
环境科学与技术 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
17.50
自引率
9.60%
发文量
12359
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) is a co-sponsored academic and technical magazine by the Hubei Provincial Environmental Protection Bureau and the Hubei Provincial Academy of Environmental Sciences. Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) holds the status of Chinese core journals, scientific papers source journals of China, Chinese Science Citation Database source journals, and Chinese Academic Journal Comprehensive Evaluation Database source journals. This publication focuses on the academic field of environmental protection, featuring articles related to environmental protection and technical advancements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信