Sympathetic Overactivation in the Resistant Hypertensive Phenotype: A Meta-Analysis of Published Studies.

IF 6.9 1区 医学 Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Guido Grassi,Fosca Quarti-Trevano,Cesare Cuspidi,Elias Sanidas,Giuseppe Mancia,Costas Thomopoulos
{"title":"Sympathetic Overactivation in the Resistant Hypertensive Phenotype: A Meta-Analysis of Published Studies.","authors":"Guido Grassi,Fosca Quarti-Trevano,Cesare Cuspidi,Elias Sanidas,Giuseppe Mancia,Costas Thomopoulos","doi":"10.1161/hypertensionaha.125.24749","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nIndirect and direct approaches to assess sympathetic cardiovascular drive have shown that patients with essential hypertension responsive to the blood pressure-lowering effects of antihypertensive drugs are characterized by a pronounced adrenergic overactivity. Whether an emerging clinical hypertensive phenotype such as drug-resistant hypertension (RHT) is also characterized by sympathetic activation and whether its magnitude and underlying pathophysiological mechanisms differ from those of non-RHT is undefined.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nAmong the 54 studies identified providing information in RHT on muscle sympathetic nerve traffic (MSNA), 12 were eligible (508 patients) and meta-analyzed, grouping them based on clinically relevant questions: (1) Is MSNA increased in RHT? (2) Does the magnitude of the sympathetic activation differ from that observed in non-RHT? (3) Are heart rate and plasma norepinephrine valuable surrogate markers of MSNA in RHT? and (4) Is baroreflex-MSNA control impaired?\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nMSNA was significantly greater in patients with RHT than in normotensive patients (73.2±6.6 versus 46.1±11.1 bursts/100 heartbeats, means±SD; P<0.0001) and this was the case also when data were compared with patients with non-RHT (59.8±8.4 bursts/100 heartbeats; P<0.001), despite the greater number of antihypertensive drugs. At variance from non-RHT, in RHT, elevated MSNA was unrelated to heart rate and plasma venous norepinephrine. Similar to non-RHT, MSNA in RHT was inversely related to the baroreflex function.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nRHT is characterized by a sustained sympathetic overdrive, significantly greater in magnitude than the 1 detected in non-RHT. Neither heart rate nor norepinephrine are capable of reflecting the marked adrenergic overdrive seen in this condition via MSNA recordings.","PeriodicalId":13042,"journal":{"name":"Hypertension","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/hypertensionaha.125.24749","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Indirect and direct approaches to assess sympathetic cardiovascular drive have shown that patients with essential hypertension responsive to the blood pressure-lowering effects of antihypertensive drugs are characterized by a pronounced adrenergic overactivity. Whether an emerging clinical hypertensive phenotype such as drug-resistant hypertension (RHT) is also characterized by sympathetic activation and whether its magnitude and underlying pathophysiological mechanisms differ from those of non-RHT is undefined. METHODS Among the 54 studies identified providing information in RHT on muscle sympathetic nerve traffic (MSNA), 12 were eligible (508 patients) and meta-analyzed, grouping them based on clinically relevant questions: (1) Is MSNA increased in RHT? (2) Does the magnitude of the sympathetic activation differ from that observed in non-RHT? (3) Are heart rate and plasma norepinephrine valuable surrogate markers of MSNA in RHT? and (4) Is baroreflex-MSNA control impaired? RESULTS MSNA was significantly greater in patients with RHT than in normotensive patients (73.2±6.6 versus 46.1±11.1 bursts/100 heartbeats, means±SD; P<0.0001) and this was the case also when data were compared with patients with non-RHT (59.8±8.4 bursts/100 heartbeats; P<0.001), despite the greater number of antihypertensive drugs. At variance from non-RHT, in RHT, elevated MSNA was unrelated to heart rate and plasma venous norepinephrine. Similar to non-RHT, MSNA in RHT was inversely related to the baroreflex function. CONCLUSIONS RHT is characterized by a sustained sympathetic overdrive, significantly greater in magnitude than the 1 detected in non-RHT. Neither heart rate nor norepinephrine are capable of reflecting the marked adrenergic overdrive seen in this condition via MSNA recordings.
交感神经过度激活在顽固性高血压表型:一项已发表研究的荟萃分析。
背景:评估交感心血管驱动的直接和直接方法表明,原发性高血压患者对降压药的降压作用有反应,其特征是明显的肾上腺素能过度活动。一种新出现的临床高血压表型,如耐药高血压(RHT)是否也以交感神经激活为特征,其强度和潜在的病理生理机制是否与非RHT不同,目前尚不清楚。方法在确认提供RHT中肌肉交感神经交通(MSNA)信息的54项研究中,12项(508例患者)符合条件并进行荟萃分析,根据临床相关问题对其进行分组:(1)RHT中MSNA是否增加?(2)交感神经激活的强度是否与非rht不同?(3)心率和血浆去甲肾上腺素是RHT中MSNA有价值的替代指标吗?(4) barreflex - msna控制是否受损?结果RHT患者的smsna显著高于正常血压患者(73.2±6.6 vs 46.1±11.1次/100次心跳,平均值±SD;P<0.0001),与非rht患者(59.8±8.4次/100次心跳;P<0.001),尽管降压药的数量更多。与非RHT不同,在RHT中,MSNA升高与心率和血浆静脉去甲肾上腺素无关。与非RHT相似,RHT的MSNA与气压反射函数呈负相关。结论srht以持续的交感神经过度驱动为特征,其强度明显大于非rht。心率和去甲肾上腺素都不能反映在这种情况下通过MSNA记录所见的明显的肾上腺素能过度驱动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hypertension
Hypertension 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
15.90
自引率
4.80%
发文量
1006
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Hypertension presents top-tier articles on high blood pressure in each monthly release. These articles delve into basic science, clinical treatment, and prevention of hypertension and associated cardiovascular, metabolic, and renal conditions. Renowned for their lasting significance, these papers contribute to advancing our understanding and management of hypertension-related issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信