An Experimental Investigation of Sexual Scripts by Partner Gender: Anticipated Clitoral Stimulation and Partner Orgasm Pursuit Shape Women's Orgasm Expectations.

IF 2.9 2区 社会学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Grace M Wetzel,Carly Wolfer,Cheryl L Carmichael,Diana T Sanchez
{"title":"An Experimental Investigation of Sexual Scripts by Partner Gender: Anticipated Clitoral Stimulation and Partner Orgasm Pursuit Shape Women's Orgasm Expectations.","authors":"Grace M Wetzel,Carly Wolfer,Cheryl L Carmichael,Diana T Sanchez","doi":"10.1007/s10508-025-03169-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research has found that bisexual women expect clitoral stimulation and orgasm more when hypothetically partnered with another woman versus a man, which is consistent with the widely documented heterosexual orgasm gap. The current research aims to (1) investigate \"perceived partner orgasm pursuit\" (i.e., the participant's perception that her partner is pursuing her orgasm) as a novel mechanism to explain this difference in orgasm expectations, and (2) demonstrate that manipulating the interpersonal sexual script with a male partner to include sufficient clitoral stimulation can increase orgasm expectations when women have sex with men. In Study 1, we found that bisexual or pansexual women (N = 457) partnered with a woman in a hypothetical scenario expected greater clitoral stimulation, partner pursuit of her orgasm, and likelihood of orgasm than those partnered with a man. In Study 2, bisexual or pansexual women (N = 362) who were partnered with a man in a hypothetical scenario that specified (1) clitoral stimulation or (2) opportunity to orgasm via her most reliable route expected her partner to pursue her orgasm and expected orgasm, at similar rates to women who were partnered with a woman whose sexual behavior was unspecified. On the contrary, women partnered with a man in a hypothetical scenario which specified vaginal intercourse only expected the lowest likelihood of orgasm. In both studies, condition predicted expected clitoral stimulation, which predicted perceived partner orgasm pursuit, which predicted orgasm expectations. This research suggests that sexual scripts explain differences in orgasm expectations by partner gender, and these expectations can be changed by shifting the sexual script at the interpersonal level to include sufficient opportunity for (and pursuit of) women's orgasm via clitoral stimulation. Findings are discussed in the context of contributors to and solutions for the orgasm gap.","PeriodicalId":8327,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Sexual Behavior","volume":"232 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Sexual Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-025-03169-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research has found that bisexual women expect clitoral stimulation and orgasm more when hypothetically partnered with another woman versus a man, which is consistent with the widely documented heterosexual orgasm gap. The current research aims to (1) investigate "perceived partner orgasm pursuit" (i.e., the participant's perception that her partner is pursuing her orgasm) as a novel mechanism to explain this difference in orgasm expectations, and (2) demonstrate that manipulating the interpersonal sexual script with a male partner to include sufficient clitoral stimulation can increase orgasm expectations when women have sex with men. In Study 1, we found that bisexual or pansexual women (N = 457) partnered with a woman in a hypothetical scenario expected greater clitoral stimulation, partner pursuit of her orgasm, and likelihood of orgasm than those partnered with a man. In Study 2, bisexual or pansexual women (N = 362) who were partnered with a man in a hypothetical scenario that specified (1) clitoral stimulation or (2) opportunity to orgasm via her most reliable route expected her partner to pursue her orgasm and expected orgasm, at similar rates to women who were partnered with a woman whose sexual behavior was unspecified. On the contrary, women partnered with a man in a hypothetical scenario which specified vaginal intercourse only expected the lowest likelihood of orgasm. In both studies, condition predicted expected clitoral stimulation, which predicted perceived partner orgasm pursuit, which predicted orgasm expectations. This research suggests that sexual scripts explain differences in orgasm expectations by partner gender, and these expectations can be changed by shifting the sexual script at the interpersonal level to include sufficient opportunity for (and pursuit of) women's orgasm via clitoral stimulation. Findings are discussed in the context of contributors to and solutions for the orgasm gap.
伴侣性别对性脚本的实验研究:预期的阴蒂刺激和伴侣性高潮追求塑造了女性的性高潮期望。
研究发现,双性恋女性在与另一名女性而不是男性合作时,更期待阴蒂刺激和高潮,这与广泛记录的异性性高潮差距一致。目前的研究旨在(1)调查“感知伴侣性高潮追求”(即参与者对其伴侣正在追求其性高潮的感知)作为解释这种性高潮期望差异的新机制,以及(2)证明在与男性伴侣发生性关系时,操纵人际性脚本以包括足够的阴蒂刺激可以增加女性与男性发生性关系时的性高潮期望。在研究1中,我们发现双性恋或泛性恋的女性(N = 457)在一个假设的场景中,与女性伴侣在一起期望更多的阴蒂刺激,伴侣对她性高潮的追求,以及性高潮的可能性。在研究2中,双性恋或泛性恋女性(N = 362)与一名男性合作,在一个假设的场景中指定(1)阴蒂刺激或(2)通过她最可靠的途径获得性高潮的机会,期望她的伴侣追求她的性高潮和预期的性高潮,其比例与与一名性行为未指明的女性合作的女性相似。相反,在一个假设的场景中,女性与男性进行阴道性交时,获得性高潮的可能性最低。在这两项研究中,条件预测预期的阴蒂刺激,预测伴侣对性高潮的追求,进而预测性高潮的期望。这项研究表明,性剧本解释了伴侣性别对性高潮期望的差异,这些期望可以通过改变人际层面的性剧本来改变,包括通过刺激阴蒂来获得(和追求)女性高潮的充分机会。研究结果在性高潮差距的成因和解决方案的背景下进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
13.20%
发文量
299
期刊介绍: The official publication of the International Academy of Sex Research, the journal is dedicated to the dissemination of information in the field of sexual science, broadly defined. Contributions consist of empirical research (both quantitative and qualitative), theoretical reviews and essays, clinical case reports, letters to the editor, and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信