SARS-CoV-2 and neurotropism: evidence, gaps and reflections.

IF 2
Thaísa Regina Rocha Lopes, Bibiana Santana Sitton, Micheli Mainardi Pillat, Carlos Fernando Mello, Rudi Weiblen, Eduardo Furtado Flores, José Valter Joaquim Silva Júnior
{"title":"SARS-CoV-2 and neurotropism: evidence, gaps and reflections.","authors":"Thaísa Regina Rocha Lopes, Bibiana Santana Sitton, Micheli Mainardi Pillat, Carlos Fernando Mello, Rudi Weiblen, Eduardo Furtado Flores, José Valter Joaquim Silva Júnior","doi":"10.1099/jmm.0.002016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients may present with a wide clinical spectrum, including extrapulmonary involvement, such as neurological damage. Although the pathogenesis of neurological COVID-19 still remains unclear, some studies have discussed the potential association between tissue injury and severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in the central nervous system (CNS) and/or immune imbalance. These two mechanisms are non-mutually exclusive; however, exacerbated inflammatory-response-induced neurological damage appears to be more aligned with COVID-19 pathogenesis, whereas SARS-CoV-2 infection/replication in the CNS remains widely discussed. Herein, we dissect this last issue, highlighting some evidence on SARS-CoV-2 neuroinvasion, as well as discussing gaps that should be addressed for a better understanding of its potential neurotropism, specifically in the CNS. Finally, we propose some deeper reflections on the SARS-CoV-2 neurotropic potential.</p>","PeriodicalId":94093,"journal":{"name":"Journal of medical microbiology","volume":"74 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12171017/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of medical microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.002016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients may present with a wide clinical spectrum, including extrapulmonary involvement, such as neurological damage. Although the pathogenesis of neurological COVID-19 still remains unclear, some studies have discussed the potential association between tissue injury and severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in the central nervous system (CNS) and/or immune imbalance. These two mechanisms are non-mutually exclusive; however, exacerbated inflammatory-response-induced neurological damage appears to be more aligned with COVID-19 pathogenesis, whereas SARS-CoV-2 infection/replication in the CNS remains widely discussed. Herein, we dissect this last issue, highlighting some evidence on SARS-CoV-2 neuroinvasion, as well as discussing gaps that should be addressed for a better understanding of its potential neurotropism, specifically in the CNS. Finally, we propose some deeper reflections on the SARS-CoV-2 neurotropic potential.

SARS-CoV-2与嗜神经性:证据、差距和反思。
2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)患者可能表现出广泛的临床症状,包括肺外受累,如神经损伤。尽管神经系统COVID-19的发病机制尚不清楚,但一些研究已经讨论了中枢神经系统(CNS)组织损伤与严重急性呼吸综合征相关冠状病毒2 (SARS-CoV-2)感染和/或免疫失衡之间的潜在关联。这两种机制并不相互排斥;然而,炎症反应引起的神经损伤加重似乎更符合COVID-19的发病机制,而SARS-CoV-2在中枢神经系统中的感染/复制仍被广泛讨论。在此,我们详细分析了最后一个问题,重点介绍了SARS-CoV-2神经侵袭的一些证据,并讨论了为了更好地了解其潜在的神经亲和性,特别是在中枢神经系统中,应该解决的空白。最后,我们对SARS-CoV-2的嗜神经潜能提出了一些更深的思考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信