Affective Symptoms, Cognitive Function and Self-Care Behaviors in Adults with Heart Failure according to Ejection Fraction Phenotype.

Maria Jędrzejczyk, Christopher S Lee, Quin E Denfeld, Remigiusz Szczepanowski, Bernadetta Żółkowska, Michał Czapla, Ercole Vellone, Marta Wleklik, Magdalena Lisiak, Izabella Uchmanowicz
{"title":"Affective Symptoms, Cognitive Function and Self-Care Behaviors in Adults with Heart Failure according to Ejection Fraction Phenotype.","authors":"Maria Jędrzejczyk, Christopher S Lee, Quin E Denfeld, Remigiusz Szczepanowski, Bernadetta Żółkowska, Michał Czapla, Ercole Vellone, Marta Wleklik, Magdalena Lisiak, Izabella Uchmanowicz","doi":"10.1093/eurjcn/zvaf112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim of this study was to compare affective symptoms, cognitive dysfunction, and self-care behaviors among different heart failure (HF) phenotypes and to explore their interrelationships, particularly examining how cognitive and affective factors influence self-care practices.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>This cross-sectional study involved 250 older adults hospitalized for acute decompensated HF, categorized into three groups based on left ventricular ejection fraction (EF): HF with reduced EF (HFrEF), mildly reduced EF (HFmrEF), and preserved EF (HFpEF). Affective symptoms were assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), while cognitive function was evaluated with the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Self-care behaviors were measured using the European Heart Failure Self-Care Behavior Scale. Among participants, 42% had HFrEF, 18.4% had HFmrEF, and 39.6% had HFpEF. Cognitive dysfunction was more pronounced in HFpEF patients (MMSE median = 28.0, IQR = 26.0-29.0) compared to those with HFrEF (median = 28.0, IQR = 27.0-29.0) or HFmrEF (median = 29.0, IQR = 27.3-29.0, p = 0.008). Higher MMSE scores were significantly associated with better self-care behaviors in HFpEF patients (Spearman's r = -0.299, p = 0.003), but not in the other groups. Significant differences were found in specific self-care behaviors, including contacting healthcare providers and adherence to a low-sodium diet.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although variations in cognitive function and self-care behaviors were observed across heart failure phenotypes, these differences were not statistically significant after adjusting for demographic and clinical factors. Tailored interventions should be based on a comprehensive assessment of cognitive and emotional health, rather than heart failure phenotype alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":93997,"journal":{"name":"European journal of cardiovascular nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of cardiovascular nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjcn/zvaf112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: The aim of this study was to compare affective symptoms, cognitive dysfunction, and self-care behaviors among different heart failure (HF) phenotypes and to explore their interrelationships, particularly examining how cognitive and affective factors influence self-care practices.

Methods and results: This cross-sectional study involved 250 older adults hospitalized for acute decompensated HF, categorized into three groups based on left ventricular ejection fraction (EF): HF with reduced EF (HFrEF), mildly reduced EF (HFmrEF), and preserved EF (HFpEF). Affective symptoms were assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), while cognitive function was evaluated with the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Self-care behaviors were measured using the European Heart Failure Self-Care Behavior Scale. Among participants, 42% had HFrEF, 18.4% had HFmrEF, and 39.6% had HFpEF. Cognitive dysfunction was more pronounced in HFpEF patients (MMSE median = 28.0, IQR = 26.0-29.0) compared to those with HFrEF (median = 28.0, IQR = 27.0-29.0) or HFmrEF (median = 29.0, IQR = 27.3-29.0, p = 0.008). Higher MMSE scores were significantly associated with better self-care behaviors in HFpEF patients (Spearman's r = -0.299, p = 0.003), but not in the other groups. Significant differences were found in specific self-care behaviors, including contacting healthcare providers and adherence to a low-sodium diet.

Conclusion: Although variations in cognitive function and self-care behaviors were observed across heart failure phenotypes, these differences were not statistically significant after adjusting for demographic and clinical factors. Tailored interventions should be based on a comprehensive assessment of cognitive and emotional health, rather than heart failure phenotype alone.

成人心力衰竭患者的情感症状、认知功能和自我护理行为与射血分数表型的关系
目的:本研究的目的是比较不同心力衰竭(HF)表型的情感症状、认知功能障碍和自我保健行为,并探讨它们之间的相互关系,特别是研究认知和情感因素如何影响自我保健行为。方法和结果:这项横断面研究纳入了250名因急性失代偿性心衰住院的老年人,根据左心室射血分数(EF)分为三组:EF降低的HF (HFrEF)、EF轻度降低的HF (HFmrEF)和EF保留的HF (HFpEF)。情感症状采用医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)和患者健康问卷-9 (PHQ-9)进行评估,认知功能采用蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)和简易精神状态检查(MMSE)进行评估。自我护理行为采用欧洲心力衰竭自我护理行为量表进行测量。在参与者中,42%患有HFrEF, 18.4%患有HFmrEF, 39.6%患有HFpEF。与HFrEF(中位数= 28.0,IQR = 27.0-29.0)或HFmrEF(中位数= 29.0,IQR = 27.3-29.0, p = 0.008)相比,HFpEF患者(MMSE中位数= 28.0,IQR = 26.0-29.0)的认知功能障碍更为明显(MMSE中位数= 28.0,IQR = 26.0-29.0)。高MMSE得分与HFpEF患者更好的自我护理行为显著相关(Spearman’s r = -0.299, p = 0.003),但在其他组中没有。在特定的自我护理行为上发现了显著的差异,包括联系医疗服务提供者和坚持低钠饮食。结论:尽管认知功能和自我护理行为在心力衰竭表型中存在差异,但在调整人口统计学和临床因素后,这些差异无统计学意义。量身定制的干预措施应基于对认知和情绪健康的综合评估,而不仅仅是心力衰竭的表型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信