Jon Mordal, Farid Juya, Line Holtan, John-Kåre Vederhus, Arild Opheim, Ida H Brenna, Asle E Enger, Bente Weimand, Kristin Klemmetsby Solli, Lars Tanum
{"title":"High induction rate onto extended-release naltrexone for people with opioid use disorder: experiences from a Norwegian naturalistic study.","authors":"Jon Mordal, Farid Juya, Line Holtan, John-Kåre Vederhus, Arild Opheim, Ida H Brenna, Asle E Enger, Bente Weimand, Kristin Klemmetsby Solli, Lars Tanum","doi":"10.1186/s13722-025-00576-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>For people with opioid use disorder (OUD), extended-release naltrexone (XR-NTX) is an effective antagonist treatment option. However, successful opioid tapering and abstinence is a prerequisite for XR-NTX induction and has repeatedly been reported as a major barrier to effective treatment. The aims of this study were to describe XR-NTX induction rates, reasons for incomplete induction, and extraordinary complications reported during the induction phase. We also compared sociodemographic and clinical variables among those who did and did not complete induction onto XR-NTX.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This naturalistic, multicenter, and open-label Norwegian study of XR-NTX included men and women aged 18-65 who had severe OUD. Most participants were referred to inpatient medically managed opioid withdrawal and received individualized pharmacological and psychosocial treatment according to clinical assessment and national guidelines. After opioid withdrawal, the participants underwent a minimum of three opioid-free days prior to XR-NTX induction. Variables were collected through baseline assessments and a retrospective patient chart review. XR-NTX induction completers and non-completers were compared via bivariate and logistic regression analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 129 participants with recent opioid use at inclusion, 106 (82%) completed XR-NTX induction. Induction was initiated in an inpatient setting for 116 participants (90%) and extraordinary complications were noted for 19 (15%) patients. Withdrawal symptoms and ambivalence were the most common reasons for non-completion, each noted in 75% of the cases. As compared with those who successfully completed induction, non-completers more often reported lifetime hepatitis (78% vs. 52%, p = 0.017), had a longer period of current substance use (mean 119 vs. 54 months, p = 0.001), and more frequently used methadone prior to study inclusion (43% vs. 8%, p < 001). In logistic regression analyses, methadone use was the only significant factor and was negatively associated with completion (odds ratio 0.20, 95% confidence interval = 0.05-0.72, p = 0.014).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results demonstrate the safety, efficacy and tolerability of a Norwegian opioid withdrawal and XR-NTX induction procedure. Although the present induction rate was high, our findings indicate that methadone users need special attention and tailored interventions regarding opioid withdrawal management and XR-NTX induction.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The study is registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03647774).</p>","PeriodicalId":54223,"journal":{"name":"Addiction Science & Clinical Practice","volume":"20 1","pages":"50"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12168299/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addiction Science & Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13722-025-00576-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: For people with opioid use disorder (OUD), extended-release naltrexone (XR-NTX) is an effective antagonist treatment option. However, successful opioid tapering and abstinence is a prerequisite for XR-NTX induction and has repeatedly been reported as a major barrier to effective treatment. The aims of this study were to describe XR-NTX induction rates, reasons for incomplete induction, and extraordinary complications reported during the induction phase. We also compared sociodemographic and clinical variables among those who did and did not complete induction onto XR-NTX.
Methods: This naturalistic, multicenter, and open-label Norwegian study of XR-NTX included men and women aged 18-65 who had severe OUD. Most participants were referred to inpatient medically managed opioid withdrawal and received individualized pharmacological and psychosocial treatment according to clinical assessment and national guidelines. After opioid withdrawal, the participants underwent a minimum of three opioid-free days prior to XR-NTX induction. Variables were collected through baseline assessments and a retrospective patient chart review. XR-NTX induction completers and non-completers were compared via bivariate and logistic regression analyses.
Results: Of 129 participants with recent opioid use at inclusion, 106 (82%) completed XR-NTX induction. Induction was initiated in an inpatient setting for 116 participants (90%) and extraordinary complications were noted for 19 (15%) patients. Withdrawal symptoms and ambivalence were the most common reasons for non-completion, each noted in 75% of the cases. As compared with those who successfully completed induction, non-completers more often reported lifetime hepatitis (78% vs. 52%, p = 0.017), had a longer period of current substance use (mean 119 vs. 54 months, p = 0.001), and more frequently used methadone prior to study inclusion (43% vs. 8%, p < 001). In logistic regression analyses, methadone use was the only significant factor and was negatively associated with completion (odds ratio 0.20, 95% confidence interval = 0.05-0.72, p = 0.014).
Conclusion: The results demonstrate the safety, efficacy and tolerability of a Norwegian opioid withdrawal and XR-NTX induction procedure. Although the present induction rate was high, our findings indicate that methadone users need special attention and tailored interventions regarding opioid withdrawal management and XR-NTX induction.
Trial registration: The study is registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03647774).
期刊介绍：
Addiction Science & Clinical Practice provides a forum for clinically relevant research and perspectives that contribute to improving the quality of care for people with unhealthy alcohol, tobacco, or other drug use and addictive behaviours across a spectrum of clinical settings.
Addiction Science & Clinical Practice accepts articles of clinical relevance related to the prevention and treatment of unhealthy alcohol, tobacco, and other drug use across the spectrum of clinical settings. Topics of interest address issues related to the following: the spectrum of unhealthy use of alcohol, tobacco, and other drugs among the range of affected persons (e.g., not limited by age, race/ethnicity, gender, or sexual orientation); the array of clinical prevention and treatment practices (from health messages, to identification and early intervention, to more extensive interventions including counseling and pharmacotherapy and other management strategies); and identification and management of medical, psychiatric, social, and other health consequences of substance use.
Addiction Science & Clinical Practice is particularly interested in articles that address how to improve the quality of care for people with unhealthy substance use and related conditions as described in the (US) Institute of Medicine report, Improving the Quality of Healthcare for Mental Health and Substance Use Conditions (Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2006). Such articles address the quality of care and of health services. Although the journal also welcomes submissions that address these conditions in addiction speciality-treatment settings, the journal is particularly interested in including articles that address unhealthy use outside these settings, including experience with novel models of care and outcomes, and outcomes of research-practice collaborations.
Although Addiction Science & Clinical Practice is generally not an outlet for basic science research, we will accept basic science research manuscripts that have clearly described potential clinical relevance and are accessible to audiences outside a narrow laboratory research field.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
