Plant to animal protein ratio in the diet of the elderly: potential for increase and impacts on nutrient adequacy and long-term health-a diet optimization study.

IF 6.5 1区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Hélène Fouillet, Jean-François Huneau, Elie Perraud, Alison Dussiot, Juhui Wang, Emmanuelle Kesse-Guyot, François Mariotti
{"title":"Plant to animal protein ratio in the diet of the elderly: potential for increase and impacts on nutrient adequacy and long-term health-a diet optimization study.","authors":"Hélène Fouillet, Jean-François Huneau, Elie Perraud, Alison Dussiot, Juhui Wang, Emmanuelle Kesse-Guyot, François Mariotti","doi":"10.1016/j.ajcnut.2025.06.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The percentage of plant protein in the diet (%PP) is increasing in high-income countries, but concerns exist regarding the elderly, who may require more protein and indispensable amino acids (IAA) than younger adults, although this remains debated.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to assess how much %PP can be safely increased in older adults depending on estimated protein requirement, and identify nutritional issues and dietary levers as %PP increases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Observed diets were extracted from dietary intakes of ≥65 y French adults (INCA3, n = 433). Using diet optimization, we modeled diets with graded %PP values ensuring full nutrient adequacy-applying constraints on energy and 34 nutrient intakes (accounting for bioavailability) and considering standard or higher protein requirements (reference intakes of 0.83 or 1 g/kg/d, respectively)-while minimizing chronic disease risk from specific food group over- or underconsumption (based on Global Burden of Disease data), with only as much departure from dietary habits as necessary.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All modeled diets differed markedly from the current unhealthy diet. Whatever the protein requirement considered, the same ∼25%-70% %PP range was compatible with minimal chronic disease risk and full nutrient adequacy. As %PP increased, iodine, calcium, eicosapentaenoic acid+docosahexaenoic acid, bioavailable iron, vitamins A, B12, and riboflavin became critical; protein was only a concern at high requirement; IAA were never problematic under protein adequacy. Sensitivity analysis revealed that raising consumption limits for legumes, nuts, vegetables, and fruit could broaden the adequate %PP range by supplying more limiting nutrients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Diets must be sufficiently rich in protein to ensure protein adequacy at higher requirements, with no risk of IAA inadequacy when protein intake is sufficient. For sustainability, %PP can potentially increase from the current ∼1/3 to ∼2/3 in an aging population while improving health and nutrient adequacy, provided sufficient seafood and dairy products remain. Further increases would require nutrient fortification/supplementation and/or new foods.</p>","PeriodicalId":50813,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Nutrition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Clinical Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajcnut.2025.06.011","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The percentage of plant protein in the diet (%PP) is increasing in high-income countries, but concerns exist regarding the elderly, who may require more protein and indispensable amino acids (IAA) than younger adults, although this remains debated.

Objectives: We aimed to assess how much %PP can be safely increased in older adults depending on estimated protein requirement, and identify nutritional issues and dietary levers as %PP increases.

Methods: Observed diets were extracted from dietary intakes of ≥65 y French adults (INCA3, n = 433). Using diet optimization, we modeled diets with graded %PP values ensuring full nutrient adequacy-applying constraints on energy and 34 nutrient intakes (accounting for bioavailability) and considering standard or higher protein requirements (reference intakes of 0.83 or 1 g/kg/d, respectively)-while minimizing chronic disease risk from specific food group over- or underconsumption (based on Global Burden of Disease data), with only as much departure from dietary habits as necessary.

Results: All modeled diets differed markedly from the current unhealthy diet. Whatever the protein requirement considered, the same ∼25%-70% %PP range was compatible with minimal chronic disease risk and full nutrient adequacy. As %PP increased, iodine, calcium, eicosapentaenoic acid+docosahexaenoic acid, bioavailable iron, vitamins A, B12, and riboflavin became critical; protein was only a concern at high requirement; IAA were never problematic under protein adequacy. Sensitivity analysis revealed that raising consumption limits for legumes, nuts, vegetables, and fruit could broaden the adequate %PP range by supplying more limiting nutrients.

Conclusions: Diets must be sufficiently rich in protein to ensure protein adequacy at higher requirements, with no risk of IAA inadequacy when protein intake is sufficient. For sustainability, %PP can potentially increase from the current ∼1/3 to ∼2/3 in an aging population while improving health and nutrient adequacy, provided sufficient seafood and dairy products remain. Further increases would require nutrient fortification/supplementation and/or new foods.

老年人饮食中的植物与动物蛋白比例:对营养充足性和长期健康的潜在增加和影响-一项饮食优化研究
背景:在高收入国家,饮食中植物蛋白的百分比(%PP)正在增加,但老年人可能比年轻人需要更多的蛋白质和必需氨基酸(IAA),尽管这一问题仍存在争议。目的:我们旨在评估老年人根据估计的蛋白质需求可以安全地增加多少%PP,并确定随%PP增加的营养问题和饮食杠杆。方法:观察饲料取自≥65岁的法国成年人(INCA3, n=433)的膳食摄入量。利用饮食优化,我们用分级的%PP值模拟饮食,确保充分的营养充足——对能量和34种营养素摄入量施加限制(考虑生物利用度),并考虑标准或更高的蛋白质需求(参考摄入量分别为0.83或1 g/kg/d)——同时最大限度地减少特定食物组过量或不足造成的慢性疾病风险(基于全球疾病负担数据),只需尽可能多地偏离饮食习惯。结果:所有模型饮食都与目前的不健康饮食有明显不同。无论考虑蛋白质需要量如何,相同的~ 25%-70% PP范围与最小的慢性疾病风险和完全的营养充足性是相容的。随着%PP的增加,碘、钙、EPA+DHA、生物可利用铁、维生素A、B12和核黄素变得至关重要;蛋白质只有在高需要量时才值得关注;在蛋白质充足的情况下,IAA不会出现问题。敏感性分析表明,提高豆类、坚果、蔬菜和水果的摄取量可以通过提供更多的限制性营养物质来扩大适足%PP的范围。结论:饮食中必须含有足够丰富的蛋白质,以保证高需要量下蛋白质的充足性,而在蛋白质摄入充足时不会出现IAA不足的风险。为了可持续性,如果有足够的海鲜和乳制品,在改善健康和营养充足性的同时,在老龄化人口中,%PP有可能从目前的1/3增加到2/3。进一步增加将需要营养强化/补充和/或新食品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
332
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: American Journal of Clinical Nutrition is recognized as the most highly rated peer-reviewed, primary research journal in nutrition and dietetics.It focuses on publishing the latest research on various topics in nutrition, including but not limited to obesity, vitamins and minerals, nutrition and disease, and energy metabolism. Purpose: The purpose of AJCN is to: Publish original research studies relevant to human and clinical nutrition. Consider well-controlled clinical studies describing scientific mechanisms, efficacy, and safety of dietary interventions in the context of disease prevention or health benefits. Encourage public health and epidemiologic studies relevant to human nutrition. Promote innovative investigations of nutritional questions employing epigenetic, genomic, proteomic, and metabolomic approaches. Include solicited editorials, book reviews, solicited or unsolicited review articles, invited controversy position papers, and letters to the Editor related to prior AJCN articles. Peer Review Process: All submitted material with scientific content undergoes peer review by the Editors or their designees before acceptance for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信