{"title":"The Use of Feather Squadron as a Remote Assessment of Auditory Processing in Australian Children With Listening Difficulties.","authors":"Grace Nixon, Cameron James Patrick, Lucy Shiels","doi":"10.1044/2025_AJA-25-00002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Auditory processing (AP) disorder is underdiagnosed in Australian children due to reduced access to assessments. Mobile health technology (mHealth) tools such as the AP assessment application Feather Squadron (FS) may be a way to overcome barriers of clinical assessments. This study aimed to consider the validity of FS as a remote assessment tool when compared to current Australian clinical assessments of speech recognition in noise, dichotic listening, temporal processing, and auditory short-term memory.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This study employed a within-subject, comparative design. Thirty-five normal-hearing children aged between 6.8 and 13.1 years (<i>M</i> = 9.1, <i>SD =</i> 1.8) were tested on the following AP skills: dichotic listening, temporal sequencing, speech recognition in noise, and auditory short-term memory. Participants were tested using traditional clinical tests administered by a qualified audiologist and then completed an mHealth delivered counterpart via the FS application. Results of both clinical and FS tests were converted into age-related <i>z</i> scores or scaled scores for comparison.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant, positive interclass correlations were found on assessments of dichotic listening in the worse ear and temporal sequencing. However, poor agreement was noted between these assessments using Bland-Altman analysis, which found substantial bias and wide limits of agreement. A moderate significant Pearson correlation was noted when comparing performance on the clinical and FS auditory short-term memory task.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>mHealth tools like FS may be useful for identifying children at risk of AP disorder and increasing referrals for assessment. The poor limits of agreement and bias recognize that FS assessments cannot directly replace clinical tests of AP skills and that despite significant relations between tasks, clinical assessments of AP skills delivered by specialists in a controlled environment remains preferable.</p>","PeriodicalId":49241,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2025_AJA-25-00002","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Auditory processing (AP) disorder is underdiagnosed in Australian children due to reduced access to assessments. Mobile health technology (mHealth) tools such as the AP assessment application Feather Squadron (FS) may be a way to overcome barriers of clinical assessments. This study aimed to consider the validity of FS as a remote assessment tool when compared to current Australian clinical assessments of speech recognition in noise, dichotic listening, temporal processing, and auditory short-term memory.
Method: This study employed a within-subject, comparative design. Thirty-five normal-hearing children aged between 6.8 and 13.1 years (M = 9.1, SD = 1.8) were tested on the following AP skills: dichotic listening, temporal sequencing, speech recognition in noise, and auditory short-term memory. Participants were tested using traditional clinical tests administered by a qualified audiologist and then completed an mHealth delivered counterpart via the FS application. Results of both clinical and FS tests were converted into age-related z scores or scaled scores for comparison.
Results: Significant, positive interclass correlations were found on assessments of dichotic listening in the worse ear and temporal sequencing. However, poor agreement was noted between these assessments using Bland-Altman analysis, which found substantial bias and wide limits of agreement. A moderate significant Pearson correlation was noted when comparing performance on the clinical and FS auditory short-term memory task.
Conclusions: mHealth tools like FS may be useful for identifying children at risk of AP disorder and increasing referrals for assessment. The poor limits of agreement and bias recognize that FS assessments cannot directly replace clinical tests of AP skills and that despite significant relations between tasks, clinical assessments of AP skills delivered by specialists in a controlled environment remains preferable.
期刊介绍:
Mission: AJA publishes peer-reviewed research and other scholarly articles pertaining to clinical audiology methods and issues, and serves as an outlet for discussion of related professional and educational issues and ideas. The journal is an international outlet for research on clinical research pertaining to screening, diagnosis, management and outcomes of hearing and balance disorders as well as the etiologies and characteristics of these disorders. The clinical orientation of the journal allows for the publication of reports on audiology as implemented nationally and internationally, including novel clinical procedures, approaches, and cases. AJA seeks to advance evidence-based practice by disseminating the results of new studies as well as providing a forum for critical reviews and meta-analyses of previously published work.
Scope: The broad field of clinical audiology, including audiologic/aural rehabilitation; balance and balance disorders; cultural and linguistic diversity; detection, diagnosis, prevention, habilitation, rehabilitation, and monitoring of hearing loss; hearing aids, cochlear implants, and hearing-assistive technology; hearing disorders; lifespan perspectives on auditory function; speech perception; and tinnitus.